Arthroscopic Versus Open Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement

American Journal of Sports Medicine - Tập 44 Số 4 - Trang 1062-1068 - 2016
Benedict U. Nwachukwu1, Brian J. Rebolledo1, Frank McCormick2, Samuel Rosas2, Joshua D. Harris3, Bryan T. Kelly4,1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
2LESS Institute, Sports Medicine Department, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
3Houston Methodist Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
4Center for Hip Preservation, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

Background:

Surgical treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) aims to improve symptoms and potentially delay initiation of hip osteoarthritis and prevent progression to end-stage hip osteoarthritis and possible total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip arthroscopy and open surgical hip dislocations are the 2 most common surgical approaches used for this condition.

Purpose:

To perform a comparative systematic review to determine whether there is a significant difference in clinical outcomes and progression to THA between hip arthroscopy and open surgical hip dislocation treatment for FAI at minimum medium-term follow-up.

Study Design:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods:

A systematic review of the MEDLINE database by use of the PubMed interface was performed. Minimum mean follow-up for included studies was set at 36 months. English-language studies with a minimum mean medium-term time frame evaluating outcome after arthroscopic or open treatment of FAI were included. Independent t tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and weighted mean pooled cohort statistics were performed.

Results:

A total of 16 studies met inclusion criteria. There were 9 open surgical hip dislocation studies and 7 hip arthroscopy studies. Open studies included 600 hips at a mean follow-up of 57.6 months (4.8 years; range, 6-144 months). Arthroscopic studies included 1484 hips at a mean follow-up of 50.8 months (4.2 years; range, 12-97 months). With THA as an outcome endpoint, there was an overall survival rate of 93% for open and 90.5% for arthroscopic procedures ( P = .06). Advanced age and preexisting chondral injury were risk factors for progression to THA after both treatments. Direct comparison among disease-specific outcome instruments between the 2 procedures was limited by outcome measure heterogeneity; however, both treatments demonstrated good outcomes in their respective scoring systems. Notably, hip arthroscopy was associated with a higher general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) score on the 12-Item Short-Form Survey physical component score ( P < .001).

Conclusion:

Both hip arthroscopy and open surgical hip dislocation showed excellent and equivalent hip survival rates at medium-term follow-up with hip-specific outcome measures, demonstrating equivalence between groups. However, hip arthroscopy was shown to have superior results regarding general HRQoL in comparison to open treatment. An increased understanding of the natural history of FAI remains warranted, with further studies needed to assess long-term outcomes for patients with FAI.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2106/00004623-200704000-00011

10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15203

10.1097/00003086-200401000-00012

10.1016/j.arthro.2008.06.001

10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29608

10.1007/s11999-013-3015-6

10.1007/s11420-012-9306-8

Botser IB, 2014, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 43, 209

10.1016/j.arthro.2010.11.008

10.1007/s00167-013-2776-5

10.1007/s11999-013-3218-x

10.1007/s11999-009-1138-6

10.1097/BLO.0b013e31815b181f

10.1136/bjsm.2010.082529

10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00099-6

10.1007/s11999-008-0648-y

10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.012

10.1016/j.arthro.2009.09.003

10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452

10.1177/0363546511434578

10.1007/s11999-008-0656-y

10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.32823

10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.28023

10.1016/j.arthro.2010.09.011

10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.059

10.3928/01477447-20110826-04

10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

10.1097/01.blo.0000150307.75238.b9

10.1177/0363546512445884

10.1177/0363546510387263

10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.154

10.1007/s00264-011-1443-z

10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.006

10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312

10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.006

10.5301/hipint.5000135

10.1177/0363546513500766

10.1097/JSM.0b013e318205dfde

10.1177/0363546514526357

10.1007/s11999-013-3268-0