Arguing in Direct Democracy: An Argument Scheme for Proposing Reasons in Debates Surrounding Public Votes

Atkinson K, Bench-Capon T, McBurney P (2005) A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11:153–171

Audi R (2001) The architecture of reason: the structure and substance of rationality. Oxford University Press

Audi R (2006) Practical reasoning and ethical decision. Routledge

Bench-Capon T, Atkinson K (2009) Abstract argumentation and values. In: Argumentation in artificial intelligence, ed. by Guillermo Simari and Iyad Rahwan. Springer pp 45–64

Bench-Capon T, Prakken H (2010) A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 223:27–36

Bench-Capon T, Prakken H, Visser W (2011) Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on artificial intelligence and law. Association for computing machinery pp 21–30

Betz G (2010) Theorie dialektischer Strukturen. Klostermann

Blackburn S (1998) Ruling passions. A theory of practical reasoning. Oxford University Press

Brun G, Betz G (2016) Analysing practical argumentation. In: The argumentative turn in policy analysis, ed. by Scen Ove Hansson and Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn. Springer pp 39–77

Blair J, Johnson R (2011) Conductive argument. An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning. College Publications

Dancy J (2004) Ethics without principles. Oxford University Press

Fairclough I, Fairclough N (2012) Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students. Routledge

Golder L, Mousson M, Keller T, Venetz A, Salathe L, Estermann C, Bohn D (2021) VOX-Analyse Juni 2021. Nachbefragung und Analyse zur eidgenössischen Volksabstimmung vom 13. Juni 2021. gfs.bern

Jenkins R, Purves D (2016) A dilemma for moral deliberation in AI. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30(2):313–335

Juthe A (2019) Reconstructing complex pro/con argumentation. Argumentation 33(3):413–454

Kagan S (1989) The limits of morality. Oxford University Press

Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux

Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291

Kearns S (2016) Bearing the weight of reasons. In: Weighing reasons, ed. by Errol Lord and Barry Maguire. Oxford University Press pp 173–190

Kernohan A (2022) How to modify the strength of a reason. Philosophical Studies 179(4):1205–1220

Kiesewetter B (2018) How reasons are sensitive to available evidence. In: Normativity: epistemic and practical, ed. by Conor McHugh, Jonathan Way, and Daniel Whiting. Oxford University Press pp 90–114

Klein J (2000) Komplexe topische Muster. Vom Einzeltopos zur diskurstyp-spezifischen Topos-Konfiguration. In: Topik und Rhetorik. Ein interdisziplinäres Symposium, ed. by Thomas Schirren and Gert Ueding. Max Niemeyer Verlag pp 623–649

Klein J (2018) Abstimmungserläuterungen. Die zentrale Textsorte der schweizerischen Direktdemokratie und ein Beispiel erfolgreichen populistischen Argumentierens. In: Sprache und Partizipation in Geschichte und Gegenwart, ed. by Bettina M. Bock and Philipp Dreesen. Hempen pp 91–108

Klein J (2019) Politik und Rhetorik. Eine Einführung. Springer

Kock C (2007) Dialectical obligations in political debate. Informal Logic 27(3):223–247

Kock C (2017) Argumentation democracy 101: deliberative norms made easy. In: Deliberative rhetoric. Arguing about doing. Windsor Studies in Argumentation

Kock C (2018) For deliberative disagreement: its venues, varieties and values. Paradigmi 36(3):477–497

Kriesi H (2005) Direct democratic choice: the Swiss experience. Lexington Books

Leal F, Marraud H (2022) How philosophers argue. An adversarial collaboration on the Russell–Copleston debate. Springer

Lewiński M (2018) Practical argumentation in the making: discursive construction of reasons for action. In: Argumentation and language—linguistic, cognitive and discursive explorations, ed. by Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman, and Jérôme Jacquin. Springer pp 219–241

Lewiński M (2021) Conclusions of practical argument: a speech act analysis. Organon F 28(2):420–457

Macagno F, Walton D (2014) Emotive language in argumentation. Cambridge University Press

Macagno F, Walton D (2018) Practical reasoning arguments: a modular approach. Argumentation 32:519–547

Maguire B, Snedegar J (2021) Normative metaphysics for accountants. Philosophical Studies 178:363–384

Marraud H (2020) Holism of reasons and its consequences for argumentation theory. In: 3rd European conference on argumentation—ECA 2019, ed. by Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Henrike Jansen, Jan Albert van Laar, and Bart Verheij, College Publications vol 3. pp 167–180

McBurney P, Hitchcock D, Parsons S (2007) The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 22:95–132

Mohammed D (2016) Goals in argumentation: a proposal for the analysis and evaluation of public political arguments. Argumentation 30:221–245

Nair S (2016) How do reasons accrue? In: Weighing reasons, ed. by Errol Lords and Barry Maguire. Oxford University Press, pp 56–73

Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L (1969) The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press

Portmore D (2009) Consequentializing. Philosophical Compass 4(2):329–347

Reisigl M, Wodak R (2009) The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In: Methods for critical discourse analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyers. Sage, pp 87–121

Rigotti E, Greco S (2019) Inference in argumentation. A topics-based approach to argument schemes. Springer

Schröter J (2020) Contradiction by default. On the discourses before popular votes in Switzerland. In: Kontradiktorische Diskurse und Macht im Widerspruch, ed. by Ingo H. Warnke, Anna-Katharina Hornidge, and Susanne Schattenberg. Springer pp 121–146

Schröter J (2022a) Argumentation in der direkten Demokratie. Zugänge—Ergebnisse—Perspektiven. In: Sprache in Politik und Gesellschaft, ed. by Heidrun Kämper and Albrecht Plewnia. de Gruyter, pp 41–72

Schröter J (ed.) (2022b) Politisches Argumentieren in der Schweiz. Buske

Schweizerische Bundeskanzlei (2009) Volksabstimmung vom 29. November 2009. Erläuterungen des Bundesrates. Schweizerische Bundeskanzlei

Schweizerische Bundeskanzlei (2020a) Volksabstimmung vom 27. September 2020. Erläuterungen des Bundesrates. Schweizerische Bundeskanzlei

Schweizerische Bundeskanzlei (2020b) Volksabstimmung vom 9. Februar 2020. Erläuterungen des Bundesrates. Schweizerische Bundeskanzlei

Schweizerische Bundeskanzlei (2021) Volksabstimmung vom 13. Juni 2021. Erläuterungen des Bundesrates. Schweizerische Bundeskanzlei

Toulmin S (2003) The uses of argument: updated edition. Cambridge University Press

Vatter A (2020) Das politische System der Schweiz, 4th edn. Nomos

Vogelstein E (2012) Subjective reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15(2):239–257

Walton D (2007) Evaluating practical reasoning. Synthese 157:197–240

Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press

Wellman C (1971) Challenge and response. Justification in ethics. Southern Illinois University Press

Yu S, Zenker F (2020) Schemes, critical questions, and complete argument evaluation. Argumentation 34:469–498