Arguing against confirmation bias: The effect of argumentative discourse goals on the use of disconfirming evidence in written argument
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Asterhan, 2009, Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog, Cognitive Science, 33, 374, 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x
Billig, 1996
Chinn, 1993, The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction, Review of Educational Research, 63, 1, 10.3102/00346543063001001
Ditto, 1992, Motivated Skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568, 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568
Dong, 2002, Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea, Reading Research Quaterly, 43, 400, 10.1598/RRQ.43.4.5
Felton, 2001, The development of argumentative discourse skill, Discourse Processes, 32, 135, 10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651595
Felton, 2009, Deliberation versus dispute: the impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom, Informal Logic, 29, 417, 10.22329/il.v29i4.2907
Felton, 2004, The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation, Cognitive Development, 19, 35, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.001
Felton, 2015, Arguing to agree: mitigating my-side bias through consensus-seeking dialogue, Written Communication, 32, 317, 10.1177/0741088315590788
Felton, 2015, Arguing collaboratively: argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 372, 10.1111/bjep.12078
Gillies, 2009, Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem-solving and learning during small-group work, Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 7, 10.1080/03057640802701945
Harmon-Jones, 2000, Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1490, 10.1177/01461672002612004
Hart, 2009, Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information, Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555, 10.1037/a0015701
Jonas, 2001, Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557, 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557
Klaczynski, 1996, Self-serving influences on adolescents’ evaluations of belief-relevant evidence, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 317, 10.1006/jecp.1996.0033
Klayman, 1995, Varieties of confirmation bias, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, 385, 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60315-1
Kuhn, 1996, Effects of evidence on attitudes: is polarization the norm?, Psychological Science, 7, 115, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00340.x
Kuhn, 1997, Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning, Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287, 10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1
Limón, 2001, On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal, Learning and Instruction, 11, 357, 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
Lord, 1989, Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
Midgette, 2007, The effects of content and audience aeareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students, Reading and Writing, 21, 131, 10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9
Mynatt, 1977, Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: an experimental study of scientific inference, Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 85, 10.1080/00335557743000053
Nickerson, 1998, Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises, Review of General Psychology, 2, 175, 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Nisbett, 1980
Nussbaum, 2005, The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 157, 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157
Reznitskaya, 2001, Influence of oral discussion on written argument, Discourse Processes, 32, 155, 10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651596
Rips, 1999, Reasoning dialogues, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 172, 10.1111/1467-8721.00041
Sandoval, 2005, The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations, Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23, 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
Schwind, 2012, Reducing confirmation bias and evaluation bias: when are preference-inconsistent recommendations effective-and when not?, Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2280, 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.035
Taber, 2012, Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs (2006), Critical Review, 24, 157, 10.1080/08913811.2012.711019
Walton, 1995
Walton, 2010
Wolfe, 2008, The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation, Thinking & Reasoning, 14, 1, 10.1080/13546780701527674
Wolfe, 2009, Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation, Written Communication, 26, 183, 10.1177/0741088309333019