Arguing against confirmation bias: The effect of argumentative discourse goals on the use of disconfirming evidence in written argument

International Journal of Educational Research - Tập 79 - Trang 167-179 - 2016
Constanza Villarroel1, Mark Felton2, Mercè García-Milà1
1Departament of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain
2Lurie College of Education, San José State University, San Jose, CA, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Asterhan, 2009, Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog, Cognitive Science, 33, 374, 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x

Billig, 1996

Chinn, 1993, The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction, Review of Educational Research, 63, 1, 10.3102/00346543063001001

Ditto, 1992, Motivated Skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568, 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568

Dong, 2002, Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea, Reading Research Quaterly, 43, 400, 10.1598/RRQ.43.4.5

Felton, 2001, The development of argumentative discourse skill, Discourse Processes, 32, 135, 10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651595

Felton, 2009, Deliberation versus dispute: the impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom, Informal Logic, 29, 417, 10.22329/il.v29i4.2907

Felton, 2004, The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation, Cognitive Development, 19, 35, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.001

Felton, 2015, Arguing to agree: mitigating my-side bias through consensus-seeking dialogue, Written Communication, 32, 317, 10.1177/0741088315590788

Felton, 2015, Arguing collaboratively: argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 372, 10.1111/bjep.12078

Gillies, 2009, Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem-solving and learning during small-group work, Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 7, 10.1080/03057640802701945

Harmon-Jones, 2000, Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1490, 10.1177/01461672002612004

Hart, 2009, Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information, Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555, 10.1037/a0015701

Jonas, 2001, Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557, 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557

Klaczynski, 1996, Self-serving influences on adolescents’ evaluations of belief-relevant evidence, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 317, 10.1006/jecp.1996.0033

Klayman, 1995, Varieties of confirmation bias, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, 385, 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60315-1

Kuhn, 1996, Effects of evidence on attitudes: is polarization the norm?, Psychological Science, 7, 115, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00340.x

Kuhn, 1997, Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning, Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287, 10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1

Limón, 2001, On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal, Learning and Instruction, 11, 357, 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2

Lord, 1989, Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098

Midgette, 2007, The effects of content and audience aeareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students, Reading and Writing, 21, 131, 10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9

Mynatt, 1977, Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: an experimental study of scientific inference, Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 85, 10.1080/00335557743000053

Nickerson, 1998, Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises, Review of General Psychology, 2, 175, 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175

Nisbett, 1980

Nussbaum, 2005, The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 157, 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157

Reznitskaya, 2001, Influence of oral discussion on written argument, Discourse Processes, 32, 155, 10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651596

Rips, 1999, Reasoning dialogues, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 172, 10.1111/1467-8721.00041

Sandoval, 2005, The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations, Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23, 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2

Schwind, 2012, Reducing confirmation bias and evaluation bias: when are preference-inconsistent recommendations effective-and when not?, Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2280, 10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.035

Taber, 2012, Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs (2006), Critical Review, 24, 157, 10.1080/08913811.2012.711019

Walton, 1995

Walton, 1989, Dialogue theory for critical thinking, Argumentation, 3, 169, 10.1007/BF00128147

Walton, 2010

Wolfe, 2008, The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation, Thinking & Reasoning, 14, 1, 10.1080/13546780701527674

Wolfe, 2009, Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation, Written Communication, 26, 183, 10.1177/0741088309333019

Zohar, 2002, Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35, 10.1002/tea.10008