Phụ nữ có bị đại diện quá mức trong các công việc không có triển vọng không? Một nghiên cứu Thụy Điển sử dụng các biện pháp xác định thực nghiệm về các công việc không có triển vọng

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 84 - Trang 159-177 - 2007
Erik Bihagen1, Marita Ohls1
1Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Đã có những khẳng định rằng phụ nữ trải qua ít cơ hội nghề nghiệp hơn so với nam giới chủ yếu vì họ bị đại diện quá mức trong các 'Công việc không có triển vọng' (DEJs). Sử dụng dữ liệu từ bảng khảo sát của Thụy Điển bao gồm 1,1 triệu nhân viên làm việc cho cùng một nhà tuyển dụng vào năm 1999 và 2003, các biện pháp về DEJ được xác định thực nghiệm từ các phân tích về khả năng di chuyển thu nhập. Kết quả cho thấy rằng phụ nữ bị đại diện quá mức trong DEJs, đặc biệt là trong khu vực công. Những phát hiện này rất thú vị từ (a) quan điểm phương pháp học, khi cho thấy rằng cơ hội nghề nghiệp liên quan đến các nghề nghiệp có thể được chỉ ra bằng một biện pháp cho cả nam giới và phụ nữ, (b) quan điểm về trần kính, theo đó có thể coi là nhấn mạnh quá nhẹ về bất bình đẳng giới liên quan đến các vị trí thấp, và (c) quan điểm về tầng lớp, vốn hoàn toàn bỏ qua giới và lĩnh vực khi giải thích cơ hội nghề nghiệp.

Từ khóa

#Cơ hội nghề nghiệp; Công việc không có triển vọng; Bất bình đẳng giới; Trần kính; Tầng lớp xã hội

Tài liệu tham khảo

Albrecht, J., Björklund, A., & Vroman, S. (2003). Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden? Journal of Labor Economics, 21(1), 145–177. Arulampalam, W., Booth, A. L., & Bryan, M. L. (2004). Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? IZA Discussion Paper, 1373, 1–31. Baxter, J., & Wright, E. O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis. A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14, 275–294. Bergmann, B. (1974). Occupational segregation, wages and profits when employers discriminate by race and sex. Eastern Economic Journal, 1, 103–110. Bihagen, E. (2005). Labour market rewards and the neo-classical soup. Acta Sociologica, 48(1), 63–84. Bihagen, E., & Ohls, M. (2006). The glass ceiling – where is it? Women’s and men’s career prospects in the private versus the public sector in Sweden 1979–2000. The Sociological Review, 54(1), 20–47. Budig, M. J. (2002). Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator? Social Problems, 49(2), 258–277. Bygren, M., & Kumlin, J. (2005). Mechanisms of organizational sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 32(1), 39–65. Cassirer, N., & Reskin, B. (2000). High hopes. Organizational position, employment experiences, and women’s and men’s promotion aspirations. Work and Occupations, 27(4), 438–463. Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. G., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681. Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books. England, P. (1992). Comparable worth. Theories and evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ganzeboom, H. B. G, & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 international standard classification of occupations. Social Science Research, 25(3), 201–239. Goldthorpe, J. H. (2000a). On sociology. Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford: University Press. Goldthorpe, J. H. (2000b). Rent, class conflict and class structure: A commentary on Sørensen. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1572–1582. Granqvist, L., & Persson, H. (1998). Career mobility in the private service sector – Are women trapped in “bad” jobs? EC/DGV – OECD/DEELSA – seminar paper. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Groot, W., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (1996). Glass ceilings or dead ends: Job promotion of men and women compared. Economic Letters, 53, 221–226. Grusky, D. B., & Sørensen, J. B. (1998). Can class analysis be salvaged? American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1187–1234. Grusky, D. B., & Weeden, K. A. (2001). Decomposition without death: A research agenda for a new class analysis. Acta Sociologica, 44(3), 203–218. Hakim, C. (2002). Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women’s differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations, 29(4), 428–459. Hansen, M. N. (1997). The Scandinavian welfare state model: The impact of the public sector on segregation and gender equality. Work, Employment & Society, 11(1), 83–99. Hansen, M. B., & Lauridsen, J. (2004). The institutional context of market ideology. Public Administration, 82(2), 491–524. Hultin, M. (2003). Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling? Work and Occupations, 30(1), 30–61. Kalleberg, A. L. (2003). Flexible firms and labor market segmentation: Effects of workplace restructuring on jobs and workers. Work and Occupations, 30(2), 154–175. Kalleberg, A. L., Reskin B. F., & Hudson, K. (2000). Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review, 65, 256–278. Kmec, J. A. (2005). Setting occupational sex segregation in motion: Demand-side explanations of sex traditional employment. Work and Occupations, 32(3), 322–354. Kolberg, J. E. (1991). The gender dimension of the welfare state. International Journal of Sociology, 21, 119–148. Korpi T., & Tåhlin M. (2006). The impact of globalization on men’s labour market mobility in Sweden. In H-P. Blossfeld, M. Mills, & F. Bernardi (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and men’s careers: An international comparison (pp. 145–173). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Kramer, L. A., & Lambert, S. (2001). Sex-linked bias in chances of being promoted to supervisor. Sociological perspectives, 44(1), 111–127. McGovern, P., Smeaton, D., & Hill, S. (2004). Bad jobs in Britain: Nonstandard employment and job quality. Work and Occupations, 31(2), 225–249. McBrier, D., & Wilson, G. (2004). Going down? Race and downward occupational mobility for white-collar workers in the 1990’s. Work and Occupations, 31(3), 283–322. Mills, M., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2006). Globalization, patchwork careers and the individualization of inequality? A 12-country comparison of men’s mid-career job mobility. In H-P. Blossfeld, M. Mills, & F. Bernardi (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and men’s careers: An international comparison (pp. 457–482). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Oesch, D. (2006). Redrawing the class map. Hampshire: Palgrave. Olsen, K. M., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2004). Non-standard work in two different employment regimes: Norway and the United States. Work, Employment & Society, 18(2), 321–348. Petersen, T., & Meyersson, E. M. (1999). More glory and less injustice. The glass ceiling in Sweden, 1970–1990. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 17, 199–261. Piore, M. J. (1969). On-the-job training in a dual labor market. In R. Arnold Weber et al. (Eds.), Public–private manpower policies (pp. 101–132). Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association. Piore, M. J. (2002). Thirty years later: Internal labor markets, flexibility and the new economy. Journal of Management and Governance, 6, 271–279. Prandy, K., & Lambert, P. S. (2003). Marriage, social distance and the social space: An alternative derivation and validation of the Cambridge Scale. Sociology, 37(3), 397–411. Statistics Sweden (SCB) (2003). Lönestatistisk årsbok 2002. Stockholm. Statistics Sweden (SCB) (2004). Evalvering och kvalitetsdeklaration av yrkesregistret: En förstudie. Unpublished report by Nejad, Yadi. Stockholm. Sørensen, A. B. (2000). Toward a sounder basis for class analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1523–1558. Sørensen, A. B., & Tuma, B. T. (1981). Labor market structures and job mobility. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 1, 67–94. Sorensen, E. (1990). The crowding hypothesis and comparable worth. The Journal of Human Resources, 25(1), 55–89. Thålin, M. (2006). Class clues. Manuscript under review. Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley, CA; London: University of California Press. Weeden, K. A. (2002) Why do some occupations pay more than others? Social closure and earning inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 55–101. Yaish, M., & Kraus, V. (2003). The consequences of economic restructuring for the gender earnings gap in Israel, 1972–1995. Work, employment and society, 17(1), 5–28. Yamagata, H., Yeh, K. S. Stewman, S., & Dodge, H. (1997). Sex segregation and glass ceilings: A comparative statics model of women’s career opportunities in the federal government over a quarter century. American Journal of Sociology, 103(3), 566–632.