Are women more sensitive than men to 2-propanol andm-xylene vapours?

Occupational and Environmental Medicine - Tập 59 Số 11 - Trang 759-767 - 2002
Lena Ernstgård1, Elisabeth Gullstrand2, Achim Löf2, Gunnar Johanson1
1Work Environment Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2Toxicology and Risk Assessment, National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Aims:To evaluate possible differences between men and women in acute health effects after controlled short term chamber exposure to vapours of two common organic solvents.

Methods:Fifty six healthy volunteers (28 per sex) were exposed to 150 ppm 2-propanol, 50 ppmm-xylene, and clean air for two hours at rest. The subjects rated symptoms on a visual analogue scale before, during, and after the exposure. Blinking frequency was measured continuously during exposure. Pulmonary function, nasal swelling, inflammatory markers (lysozyme, eosinophilic cationic potein, myeloperoxidase, albumin) in nasal lavage and colour vision (Lanthony D-15 desaturated panel) were measured before and at 0 and 3 hours after the exposure.

Results:There were no significant sex differences in response to solvent exposure with respect to blinking frequency, lung diffusing capacity, nasal area and volume, inflammatory markers in nasal lavage, and colour vision. Increased symptoms were rated by both sexes for nearly all 10 questions during exposure to 2-propanol orm-xylene, most increases being significant at one time point at least. The rating of “discomfort in the throat or airways” increased more in women during exposure to 2-propanol orm-xylene. During exposure to 2-propanol the rating of “fatigue” was more increased in men after one hour, but more increased in women after two hours of exposure. With regard to pulmonary function, women had small but significant decreases in FVC, FEV1/FVC, and FEF75three hours after exposure tom-xylene, but only the decrease in FVC was significantly different from that in men.

Conclusion:Our results suggest that women are slightly more sensitive than men to the acute irritative effects of 2-propanol andm-xylene vapours.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Statistics. Statistical yearbook of Sweden 99, Vol 85. Örebro, Sweden: Statistics, 1999.

1993, Läkartidningen, 90, 3773

Isopropanol. In: Harbison RD, ed. Hamilton & Hardy’s industrial toxicology, 5th edn. St Louis: Laura De Young, 1998.

NIOSH. Occupational exposure to isopropyl alcohol. HEW publication no. (NIOSH). 1976:76–142.

SWEA. Provisions and general recommendations. Ordinance AFS 2000:3. Swedish Work Environment Authority, 2000.

ACGIH. Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices. American Coference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2000.

IPCS. Xylenes. Environmental Health Criteria 190. IPCS, 1997.

10.1006/rtph.1996.0081

1993, Indoor Air, 3, 155, 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.t01-1-00002.x

10.1097/00043764-199107000-00006

10.1007/s004200050270

1985, Scand J Work Environ Health, 11, 271, 10.5271/sjweh.2221

10.1007/BF00914095

1989, J Clin Invest, 84, 1528, 10.1172/JCI114329

10.1006/taap.1996.0223

10.1016/S0041-008X(05)80002-X

10.1006/enrs.1993.1132

10.1136/oem.54.7.457

1954, J Clin Invest, 33, 1135, 10.1172/JCI102987

1989, J Appl Physiol, 66, 295, 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.1.295

10.1093/toxsci/46.1.143

Gullstrand E, Sköldström B, Johanson M, et al. Recording of blink frequency by computerised EMG analysis. Singapore: ICOH, 2000.

1978, Doc Ophthalmol, 46, 185

2000, Arch Environ Health, 55, 399, 10.1080/00039890009604037

1990, Scand J Prim Health Care, 8, 9, 10.3109/02813439008994923

1994, Toxicol Ind Health, 10, 497, 10.1177/074823379401000519

10.1097/00043764-199803000-00013

1985, Scand J Work Environ Health, 11, 271, 10.5271/sjweh.2221

10.1093/toxsci/48.2.189

1999, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 159, 1163, 10.1164/ajrccm.159.4.9703106

1990, Indian J Physiol Pharmacol, 34, 209

1980, Indian J Physiol Pharmacol, 24, 112

1996, Am J Physiol, 270, L110

1991, Am Rev Respir Dis, 143, 978, 10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_Pt_1.978

1998, Am J Rhinol, 12, 341, 10.2500/105065898780182462