Are patenting scientists the better scholars?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Astebro, 2003, The return in independent invention: evidence of unrealistic optimism, risk seeking or skewness loving?, Economic Journal, 113, 226, 10.1111/1468-0297.00089
Azagra-Caro, 2006, Patent production at a European research university: exploratory evidence at the laboratory level, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 257, 10.1007/s10961-005-6110-3
Azagra-Caro, 2003, Types of contractual funding and university patents: from analysis to a case study
Balconi, 2004, Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data, Research Policy, 33, 127, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2
Bassecoulard, 2004, Patents and publications: the lexical connection, 665
Bhattacharya, 2003, Large firms and the science/technology interface—patents, patent citations, and scientific output in thin films, Scientometrics, 58, 265, 10.1023/A:1026284510104
Blauwhof, G., 1995. The Non-linear dynamics of technological developments: an exploration of telecommunications technology. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Blumenthal, 1996, Participation of life science faculty in research relationships with industry, New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1734, 10.1056/NEJM199612053352305
Brusoni, 2001, Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make?, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 597, 10.2307/3094825
Budworth, 1996
Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., 2004. Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications. Working Paper no. 162, CESPRI, University Bocconi, Milan.
Calderini, 2005, If star scientists do not patent: an event history analysis of scientific eminence and the decision to patent in the academic world
Calvert, 2003, University-industry research collaborations in the UK: bibliometric trends, Science and Public Policy, 30, 85, 10.3152/147154303781780597
Clark, 1998
Coward, 1989, Identifying the science-technology interface—matching patent data to a bibliometric model, Science Technology & Human Values, 14, 50, 10.1177/016224398901400106
Darby, M.R., Zucker, L.G., 2003. Grilichesian breakthroughs: inventions of methods of inventing and firm entry in nanotechnology. NBER Working Paper Series, #9825, accessed at http://www.nber.org/papers/w9825.
Darby, M.R.; Zucker, L.G., 2005. Socio-economic impact of nanoscale science: initial results and nanobank. NBER Working Paper Series, #11181, accessed at http://www.nber.org/papers/w11181.
Ellis, P., Hepburn, G., Oppenheim, C., 1977. Patent citation networks. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Patent Information and Documentation (No Pagination). Munich, Germany (Cited in Oppenheim (2000)).
Ellis, 1978, Studies on patent citation networks, Journal of Documentation, 34, 12, 10.1108/eb026650
Etzkowitz, 1983, Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science, Minerva, 21, 198
Etzkowitz, 1997
Geuna, A., Nesta, L., 2006. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence, Research Policy 35 (6) 790–807.
Gibbons, 1994
Gittelman, 2003, Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns, Management Science, 49, 366, 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.366.14420
Glänzel, 2003, Patents cited in the scientific literature: an exploratory study of ‘reverse’ citation relations in the Triple Helix, Scientometrics, 58, 415, 10.1023/A:1026248929668
Glänzel, 2003
Gläser, 2004, Interorganisational evaluation: are there ‘least evaluable units’?, Research Evaluation, 13, 19, 10.3152/147154404781776554
Godin, B., 1993. The relationship between science and technology: a bibliometric analysis of papers and patents in innovative firms. Unpublished D. Phil. thesis. University of Sussex, Brighton.
Godin, 1995, Research and the practice of publication in industries, Research Policy, 25, 587, 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00859-4
Godin, 1998, Writing performative history: the new New Atlantis?, Social Studies of Science, 28, 465, 10.1177/030631298028003004
Granstrand, 1997, Multitechnology corporations: why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ capabilities, California Management Review, 39, 8, 10.2307/41165908
Gulbrandsen, 2002, The external orientation of university researchers: implications for academic performance and management
Gulbrandsen, 2005, Industry funding and university professors’ research performance, Research Policy, 34, 932, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.004
Heinze, 2004, Nanoscience and nanotechnology in Europe: analysis of publications and patent applications including comparisons with the United States, Nanotechnology Law and Business, 1, 427
Heller, 1998, Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research, Science, 280, 698, 10.1126/science.280.5364.698
Hicks, 2001, The changing composition of innovative activity in the US—a portrait based on patent analysis, Research Policy, 30, 681, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00147-5
Hicks, 2004, Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of federally funded research in the United States, Research Evaluation, 13, 78, 10.3152/147154404781776446
Hullmann, 2003, Publications and patents in nanotechnology. An overview of previous studies and the state of the art, Scientometrics, 58, 507, 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006877.45467.a7
Klitkou, A., Nygaard, S., Meyer, M. Tracking techno-science networks: a case study of fuel cells and related hydrogen technology R&D in Norway. Scientometrics 70 (2), in press.
Kumaramangalam, 2004, Does collaborating with academia improve industry science? Evidence from the UK Biotechnology Sector, 1988–2001, ASLIB Proceedings, 57, 261, 10.1108/00012530510599217
Kuusi, 2002, Technological generalizations and leitbilder—the anticipation of technological opportunities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69, 625, 10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00182-8
Langlois, 1992, Transaction costs economics in real time, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1, 99, 10.1093/icc/1.1.99
Lessig, 2001
Leydesdorff, 2003, The triple helix of university-industry-government relations: a model for innovation in the ‘knowledge-based’ economy. Introduction to the Triple Helix special issue, Scientometrics, 58, 191, 10.1023/A:1026276308287
Malo, 2000, Science/technology linkages in an emerging research platform: the case of combinatorial chemistry and biology, Scientometrics, 47, 303, 10.1023/A:1005643127551
Malsch, 1999, Nanotechnology in Europe: scientific and organizational dynamics, Nanotechnology, 10, 1, 10.1088/0957-4484/10/1/002
Malsch, 1997
Markiewicz, K.R., Di Minin, A., 2004. Commercializing the laboratory: the relationship between faculty patenting and publishing. Haas School of Business Working Paper.
Martin, 2000, The origin and evolution of the university species, VEST, 13, 9
McMillan, 2000, An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology, Research Policy, 29, 1, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00030-X
Meyer, 2000, Patent citations in a novel field of technology—what can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology?, Scientometrics, 48, 151, 10.1023/A:1005692621105
Meyer, 2002, Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems, Scientometrics, 54, 193, 10.1023/A:1016057727209
Meyer, 2003, Are academic patents an indicator of useful university research?, Research Evaluation, 12, 17, 10.3152/147154403781776735
Meyer, 2005, Independent inventors and public support measures: insights from 33 case studies in Finland, World Patent Information, 27, 113, 10.1016/j.wpi.2004.10.012
Meyer, 2004
Meyer, 1998, Nanotechnology—interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application, Scientometrics, 42, 195, 10.1007/BF02458355
Meyer, 2002
Meyer, 2003, Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators—a study of university-related patents and a survey of inventors, Scientometrics, 58, 321, 10.1023/A:1026240727851
Meyer, 2001, Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano-science and nano-technology, Scientometrics, 51, 163, 10.1023/A:1010572914033
Meyer, M.S., 2002. Between Technology and Science: Exploring an Emerging Field: Knowledge Flows and Networking on the Nano-Scale. Doctoral thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton. Available through dissertation.com at http://www.dissertation.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book=1581122535.
Murray, 2002, Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering, Research Policy, 31, 1389, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00070-7
Murray, 2004, The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life, Research Policy, 33, 643, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.013
Murray, F., Stern, S., 2003. Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. SPRU Conference in Honor of Keith Pavitt, 2003, Brighton (Cited draft dated November 10, 2003).
Narin, 1995, Linkage between agency supported research and patented industrial technology, Research Evaluation, 5, 183, 10.1093/rev/5.3.183
Narin, 1997, The increasing linkage between US technology and public science, Research Policy, 26, 317, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9
Noyons, 2004
Noyons, 1994, Exploring the science and technology interface—inventor author relations in laser medicine research, Research Policy, 23, 443, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90007-8
Oppenheim, 2000, Do patent citations count?, 405
Price, 1965, Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography, Technology and Culture, 6, 553, 10.2307/3101749
Rabeharisoa, 1992, A special mediation between science and technology: when inventors publish scientific articles in fuel cells research, 45
Ranga, 2003, Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: a case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium, Scientometrics, 58, 301, 10.1023/A:1026288611013
Rapmund, A., Gulbrandsen, M., Iversen, E.J., 2004. Academic patenting in Norway. Paper Presented at the 9th Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics, Informetrics and Research Policy. Abo Akademi, Turku (Finland).
Rip, 1992, Science and technology as dancing partners, 231
Saragossi, 2003, What patent data reveal about universities: the case of Belgium, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 47, 10.1023/A:1021678719567
Schmoch, 2004, The technological output of scientific institutions, 717
Schmoch, U., 2006. The role of universities in economic growth: the German situation. Paper presented at the 5th International Congress on Higher Education, Cuba, February 13–17, 2006.
Schummer, 2004, Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 59, 425, 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38
Stephan, P.E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A.J., Black, G., 2005. Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients. Forthcoming in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Accessed at http://www2.gsu.edu/∼ecosgg/research/pdf/sgsb_eint.pdf.
Stokes, 1997
Tijssen, 2004, Science-technology connections and Interactions, 695
Tijssen, 1997, Unravelling the cognitive and interorganisational structure of public/private R&D networks: a case study of catalysis research in the Netherlands, Research Policy, 25, 1277, 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00908-0
Van Looy, 2004, Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?, Research Policy, 33, 425, 10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.004
Verbeek, 2002, Linking science to technology: using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes, Scientometrics, 54, 399, 10.1023/A:1016034516731
Whalley, 1991, The social practice of independent inventing, Science, Technology and Human Values, 16, 208, 10.1177/016224399101600205
Zitt, 2006, Delineating complex scientific fields by a hybrid lexical-citation method: an application to nanosciences, Information Processing and Management, 42, 1513, 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.016
Zitt, 2004, Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: from cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation, Scientometrics, 63, 373, 10.1007/s11192-005-0218-y
Zucker, 1996, Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 12709, 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12709
Zucker, G.L., Darby, M.R., 1995. Virtuous Circles of Productivity: Star Bioscientists and the Institutional Transformation of Industry. NBER Working Paper No. 5342.
Zucker, 1998, Intellectual capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises, American Economic Review, 88, 290