Are group members less inequality averse than individual decision makers?

Andreoni, 2004, Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising, J. Publ. Econ., 88, 1605, 10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00040-9 Akerlof, 2000, Economics and identity, Q. J. Econ., 115, 715, 10.1162/003355300554881 Ambrus, 2014 Ariely, 2009, Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 544, 10.1257/aer.99.1.544 Baker, 2008, Comparing group and individual behavior in lottery-choice experiments, South. Econ. J., 75, 367, 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2008.tb00909.x Balafoutas, 2014, Revealed distributional preferences: individuals vs. teams, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 108, 319, 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.12.012 Bartling, 2009, Egalitarianism and competitiveness, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 93, 10.1257/aer.99.2.93 Bartling, 2010, Equal sharing rules in partnerships, J. Inst. Theor. Econ., 166, 299, 10.1628/093245610791342987 Bénabou, 2006, Incentives and prosocial behavior, Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 1652, 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652 Beranek, 2015, Stated and revealed inequality aversion in three subject pools, J. Econ. Sci. Assoc., 1, 43, 10.1007/s40881-015-0007-1 Bischoff, 2013 Blanco, 2011, A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences, Games Econ. Behav., 72, 321, 10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.008 Blinder, 2005, Are two heads better than one? Monetary policy by committee, J. Money Credit Bank., 37, 798, 10.1353/mcb.2005.0048 Bolton, 2000, ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity and competition, Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 166, 10.1257/aer.90.1.166 Bolton, 2006, Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: comment, Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 1906, 10.1257/aer.96.5.1906 Bornstein, 1998, Individual and group behavior in the ultimatum game: are groups more “rational” players?, Exp. Econ., 1, 101, 10.1023/A:1009914001822 Bornstein, 2004, Individual and group decisions in the centipede game: are groups more “rational” players?, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 40, 599, 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.003 Bornstein, 2004, Do democracies breed chickens?, 248 Bosman, 2006, Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment, Exp. Econ., 9, 35, 10.1007/s10683-006-4310-9 Brandts, 2011, The strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons, Exp. Econ., 14, 375, 10.1007/s10683-011-9272-x Casari, 2011 Cason, 1997, A laboratory study in group polarisation in the team dictator game, Econ. J., 107, 1465, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00058.x Charness, 2012, Groups make better self-interested decisions, J. Econ. Perspect., 26, 157, 10.1257/jep.26.3.157 Chen, 2009, Group identity and social preferences, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 431, 10.1257/aer.99.1.431 Cheung, 2011, Two heads are less bubbly than one: team decision-making in an experimental asset market, Exp. Econ., 15, 373, 10.1007/s10683-011-9304-6 Cooper, 2005, Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games, Am. Econ. Rev., 95, 477, 10.1257/0002828054201431 Cox, 2002, Trust, reciprocity, and other-regarding preferences: groups vs. individuals and males vs females Cox, 2006, Barking up the right tree: are small groups rational agents?, Exp. Econ., 9, 209, 10.1007/s10683-006-9123-3 Dannenberg, 2007 Engelmann, 2004, Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments, Am. Econ. Rev., 94, 857, 10.1257/0002828042002741 Fahr, 2011, Who follows the crowd – groups or individuals?, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 80, 200, 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.03.007 Fehr, 1999, A theory of faimess, competition, and cooperation, Q. J. Econ., 114, 817, 10.1162/003355399556151 Festinger, 1952, Some consequences of deindividuation in a group, J. Soc. Psychol., 47, 382 Fischbacher, 2007, z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, Exp. Econ., 10, 171, 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4 Forsythe, 1994, Fairness in simple bargaining experiments, Games Econ. Behav., 6, 347, 10.1006/game.1994.1021 Franzen, 2014, Giving according to preferences: decision-making in the group dictator game reconsidered, Soz. Welt, 65, 139, 10.5771/0038-6073-2014-2-139 Hoffman, 1994, Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games, Games Econ. Behav., 7, 346, 10.1006/game.1994.1056 Gangadharan, 2015 Gill, 2015, Desert and inequity aversion in teams, J. Public Econ., 123, 42, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.001 Gillet, 2009, The tragedy of the commons revisited: the importance of group decision-making, J. Public Econ., 93, 785, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.02.001 Güth, 1982, An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 3, 367, 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 Güth, 2009 Harrison, 2012, Preferences over social risk, Oxf. Econ. Pap., 65, 25, 10.1093/oep/gps021 He, 2012, Group decision making under risk: an experiment with student couples, Econ. Lett., 117, 691, 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.081 He, 2015 Karlan, 2014, Hey look at me: The effect of giving circles on giving, J. Econ. Behav. Organiz., 106, 402, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.013 Kerschbamer, 2015, The geometry of distributional preferences and a nonparametric identification approach: the equality equivalence test, Eur. Econ. Rev., 76, 85, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.01.008 Kocher, 2005, The decision maker matters: individual versus group behaviour in experimental beauty-contest games, Econ. J., 115, 200, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00966.x Kocher, 2006, Individual or team decision-making – causes and consequences of self-selection, Games Econ. Behav., 56, 259, 10.1016/j.geb.2005.08.009 Kocher, 2007, Individual versus group behavior and the role of the decision making procedure in gift-exchange experiments, Empirica, 34, 63, 10.1007/s10663-006-9026-8 Kugler, 2007, Trust between individuals and groups: groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy, J. Econ. Psychol., 28, 646, 10.1016/j.joep.2006.12.003 Kugler, 2012, Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups, Cogn. Sci., 3, 471 Linardi, 2011, No excuses for good behavior: Volunteering and the social environment, J. Publi. Econ., 95, 445, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.020 Luhan, 2009, Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered, Exp. Econ., 12, 26, 10.1007/s10683-007-9188-7 Masclet, 2008, Punishment, inequality and welfare: a public good experiment, Soc. Choice Welf., 31, 475, 10.1007/s00355-007-0291-7 Mohnen, 2008, Transparency, inequity aversion, and the dynamics of peer pressure in teams: theory and evidence, J. Labor Econ., 26, 693, 10.1086/591116 Müller, 2013, Who acts more like a game theorist? Group and individual play in a sequential market game and the effect of the time horizon, Games Econ. Behav., 82, 658, 10.1016/j.geb.2013.09.007 Nikiforakis, 2012, Normative conflict and feuds: the limits of self-enforcement, J. Public Econ., 96, 797, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.014 Reicher, 1995, A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena, Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol., 6, 161, 10.1080/14792779443000049 Reuben, 2013, Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations, Games Econ. Behav., 77, 122, 10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.001 Rey-Biel, 2008, Inequity aversion and team incentives, Scand. J. Econ., 110, 297, 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00540.x Reinstein, 2012, Reputation and influence in charitable giving: An experiment, Theory Decis., 72, 221, 10.1007/s11238-011-9245-8 Robert, 1997, Group choice in ultimatum bargaining, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 72, 256, 10.1006/obhd.1997.2738 Rockenbach, 2007, Teams take the better risks, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 63, 412, 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.023 Sheremeta, 2010, Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?, Soc. Choice Welf., 35, 175, 10.1007/s00355-009-0434-0 Shupp, 2008, Risk preference differentials of small groups and individuals, Econ. J., 118, 258, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02112.x Sniezek, 1992, Groups under uncertainty: an examination of confidence and decision making by groups, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 52, 124, 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90048-C Stahlberg, 1995, We knew it all along: hindsight bias in groups, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 63, 46, 10.1006/obhd.1995.1060 Sutter, 2005, Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size, Econ. Lett., 88, 41, 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.12.024 Sutter, 2007, Are teams prone to myopic loss aversion? An experimental study on individual versus team investment behavior, Econ. Lett., 97, 128, 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.02.031 Sutter, 2009, Individuals and teams in auctions, Oxf. Econ. Pap., 61, 380, 10.1093/oep/gpn037 Soetevent, 2005, Anonymity in giving in a natural context—a field experiment in 30 churches, J. Publi. Econ., 89, 2301, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.11.002 Soetevent, 2011, Payment choice, image motivation and contributions to charity: evidence from a field experiment, Am. Econ. J.: Econ. Policy, 3, 180 Song, 2009, Intergroup trust and reciprocity in strategic interactions: effects of group decision-making mechanisms, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 108, 164, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.005 Tanaka, 2010, Risk and time preferences: linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam, Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 557, 10.1257/aer.100.1.557 Van Vugt, 2007, Gender differences in cooperation and competition: the male-warrior hypothesis, Psychol. Sci., 18, 19, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01842.x Yang, 2016, Inequity aversion revisited, J. Econ. Psychol., 54, 1, 10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.009 Zhang, 2012, How groups reach agreements in risky choices: an experiment, Econ. Inq., 50, 502, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00362.x