Are case studies more than sophisticated storytelling?: Methodological problems of qualitative empirical research mainly based on semi-structured interviews

Thomas Diefenbach1
1University of Strathclyde

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Achenbaum A.A. (2001). When good research goes bad. Mark. Res. 13(4): 13–15

Altheide D.L. and Johnson J.M. (1998). Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, pp 283–312.   Sage, Thousand Oaks

Alvesson M. (2003). Methodology for close up studies—struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Educ. 46(2): 167–193

Anastas J.W. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: issues and possible answers. Res. Soc. Work Pract. 14(1): 57–65

Angen M.J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qual. Health Res. 10(3): 378–395

Barbour R.S. (2003). The newfound credibility of qualitative research? Tales of technical essentialism and co-option. Qual. Health Res. 13(7): 1019–1027

Blichfeldt B.S. and Andersen J.R. (2006). Creating a wider audience for action research: learning from case-study research. J. Res. Pract. 2(1): 1–15

Bryman A. (2006). Paradigm peace and the implications for quality. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 9(2): 111–126

Caelli, K., Ray, L., Mill, J.: ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2(2), Article 1, retrieved September 2, 2004 from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/pdf/caellietal.pdf (2003)

Collins E.C. (1992). Qualitative research as art: toward a holistic process. Theory into Pract. XXXI(2): 181–185

Deem R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: is the local dimension still important? Comp. Educ. 37(1): 7–20

Denzin N.K. (1998). The art and politics of interpretation. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, pp 313–344.   Sage, Thousand Oaks

Diefenbach T. (2003). Kritik und Neukonzeption der Allgemeinen Betriebswirtschaftslehre auf sozialwissenschaftlicher Basis. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

Diefenbach T. (2007). The managerialistic ideology of organisational change management. J. Organ. Change Manage. 20(1): 126–144

Drisko, J.W.: Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to promote academic integrity. J. Soc. Work Educ. 33(1), retrieved September 2, 2004 from EBSCO, item 9703102481 (1997)

Easterby-Smith M., Thorpe R. and Lowe A. (1991). Management Research. An Introduction. SAGE Publications, London

Eden C. and Huxham C. (1996). Action research for management research. Br. J. Manage. 7: 75–86

Fine G.A. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: moral dilemmas of field research. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 22: 267–294

Glaser B.G. and Strauss A.L. (1967). The   Discovery   of   Grounded   Theory—Strategies   for   Qualitative  Research. de Gruyter, Hawthorne

Henwood K. and Pidgeon N. (1994). Beyond the qualitative paradigm: a framework for introducing diversity within qualitative psychology. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 4: 225–238

Jensen J.L. and Rodgers R. (2001). Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research. Public Adm. Rev. 61(2): 235–246

Karami A., Rowley J. and Analoui F. (2006). Research and knowledge building in management studies: an analysis of methodological preferences. Int. J. Manage. 23(1): 43–52

Keating J. (1995). A framework for classifying and evaluating the theoretical contributions of case research in management accounting. J. Manage. Account. Res. 7: 66–86

MacPherson I., Brooker R. and Ainsworth P. (2000). Case study in the contemporary world of research: using notions of purpose, place, process and product to develop some principles for practice. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 3(1): 49–61

Maso I. (1989). The necessity of being flexible. Qual. Quant. 23: 161–170

Meijer C., Verloop N. and Beijaard D. (2002). Multi-Method triangulation in a qualitative study on teachers’ practical knowledge: an attempt to increase internal validity. Qual. Quant. 36: 145–167

Popper, K.R.: Das Elend des Historizismus, 5th edn. (translation of 2nd English edition of ‘The Poverty of Historicism’, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1960), J.C.B. Mohr (Siebeck), To¨bingen (1979)

Pyett P.M. (2003). Validation of qualitative research in the “real world”, Qual. Health Res. 13(8): 1170–1179

Ritchie J.E. (2001). Case series research: a case for qualitative method in assembling evidence. Physiother. Theory Pract. 17: 127–135

Wainwright, D.: Can sociological research be qualitative, critical and valid? Qual. Rep. 3(2), retrieved September 2, 2004, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-2/wain.html (1997)

Whittemore R., Chase S.K. and Mandle C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qual. Health Res. 11(4): 522–537

Winter, G.: A comparative discussion of the notion of “validity” in qualitative and quantitative research, Qualitative Report, 4(3/4), retrieved September 2, 2004, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/winter.html (2000)