Are Trustworthiness and Legitimacy ‘Hard to Win, Easy to Lose’? A Longitudinal Test of the Asymmetry Thesis of Police-Citizen Contact

Journal of Quantitative Criminology - Tập 37 - Trang 1003-1045 - 2020
Thiago R. Oliveira1, Jonathan Jackson1, Kristina Murphy2, Ben Bradford3
1Department of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
2Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
3UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Test the asymmetry thesis of police-citizen contact that police trustworthiness and legitimacy are affected more by negative than by positive experiences of interactions with legal agents by analyzing changes in attitudes towards the police after an encounter with the police. Test whether prior attitudes moderate the impact of contact on changes in attitudes towards the police. A two-wave panel survey of a nationally representative sample of Australian adults measured people’s beliefs about police trustworthiness (procedural fairness and effectiveness), their duty to obey the police, their contact with the police between the two waves, and their evaluation of those encounters in terms of process and outcome. Analysis is carried out using autoregressive structural equation modeling and latent moderated structural models. The association between both process and outcome evaluation of police-citizen encounters and changes in attitudes towards the police is asymmetrical for trust in police effectiveness, symmetrical for trust in procedural fairness, and asymmetrical (in the opposite direction expected) for duty to obey the police. Little evidence of heterogeneity in the association between encounters and trust in procedural fairness and duty to obey, but prior levels of perceived effectiveness moderate the association between outcome evaluation and changes in trust in police effectiveness. The association between police-citizen encounters and attitudes towards the police may not be as asymmetrical as previously thought, particularly for changes in trust in procedural fairness and legitimacy. Policy implications include considering public-police interactions as ‘teachable moments’ and potential sources for enhancing police trustworthiness and legitimacy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allison PD (1990) Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociol Methodol 20:93–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/271083 Augustyn MB (2016) Updating perceptions of (in)justice). J Res Crime Delinquen 53(2):255–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815616991 Bakk Z, Kuha J (2018) Two-step estimation of models between latent classes and external variables. Psychometrika 83(4):871–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9592-7 Baumeister RF, Bratlavky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol 5(4):323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 Bottoms A, Tankebe J (2012) Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. J Crimin Law Criminol 102(1):119–170 Bradford B (2010) Convergence, not divergence? Trends and trajectories in public contact and confidence in the police. Br J Criminol 51(1):179–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq078 Bradford B (2017) Stop and search and police legitimacy. Routledge, London Bradford B, Jackson J, Stanko EA (2009) Contact and confidence: revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing Soc 19(1):20–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802457594 Bradford B, Murphy K, Jackson J (2014) Officers as mirrors: policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. Br J Criminol 45:527–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu021 Brown B, Benedict WR (2002) Perceptions of the police. Policing Int J 25(3):543–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210437032 Fine A, Cauffman E (2015) Race and justice system attitude formation during the transition to adulthood. J Dev Life-Course Criminol 1:325–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0021-2 Fine A, Cavanagh C, Donley S, Steinberg L, Frick PJ, Cauffman E (2016) The role of peers arrests on the development of youth’s attitudes towards the justice system. Law Hum Behav 40(2):211–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000167 Fine A, Cavanagh C, Donley S, Frick PJ, Steinberg L, Cauffman E (2017) Is the effect of justice system attitudes on recidivism stable after youths’ first arrest? Race and legal socialization among first-time youth offenders. Law Hum Behav 41(2):146–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000229 Gau J (2010) A longitudinal analysis of citizens’ attitudes about police. Policing Int J Police Strateg Manag 33(2):236–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511011044867 Hamaker EL, Kuiper RM, Grasman RP (2015) A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychol Methods 20(1):102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889 Hamm JA, Trinkner R, Carr JD (2017) Fair process, trust, and cooperation: Moving toward an integrated framework of police legitimacy. Criminal Justice Behav 44(9):1183–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817710058 Hardin R (1996) Trustworthiness. Ethics 107(1):26–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/233695 Hinds H, Murphy K (2007) Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Aust N Z J Criminol 40(1):27–42. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.40.1.27 Jackson J (2018) Norms, normativity, and the legitimacy of justice institutions: international perspectives. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci 14:145–165. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113734 Jackson J, Bradford B (2019) Blurring the distinction between empirical and normative legitimacy? A methodological commentary on ‘Police legitimacy and citizen cooperation in China’. Asian Journal of Criminology 14:265–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817710058 Jackson J, Gau J (2015) Carving up concepts? Differentiating between trust and legitimacy in public attitudes towards legal authority. In: Shockley E, Neal T, PytlikZillig L, Bornstein B (eds) Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration. Springer, London Jackson J, Kuha J (2016) How theory guides measurement: public attitudes towards crime and policing. In: Handbook on measurement issues in criminology and criminal justice. Wiley Online Library Jackson J, Pósch K (2019) New directions for research into fairness and legal authority: A focus on causal mechanisms. In: Lind A (ed) Social Psychology and Justice (Frontiers of Social Psychology Series). Routledge, Oxon Jackson J, Bradford B, Hough M, Myhil A, Quinton P, Tyler T (2012) Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. Br J Criminol 52(6):1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032 Jackson J, Bradford B, Stanko EA, Hohl K (2013) Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. Willan, London Jackson J, Brunton-Smith I, Bradford B, Oliveira TR, Pósch K, Sturgis P (2020) Police legitimacy and the norm to cooperate: Using a mixed effects location-scale model to estimate social norms at a small spatial scale. J Quant Criminol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-020-09467-5 Kaiser K, Reisig MD (2019) Legal socialization and self-reported criminal offending: the role of procedural justice and legal orientations. J Quant Criminol 35:135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9375-4 Keele L, Kelly NJ (2006) Dynamic models for dynamic theories: the ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Polit Anal 14(2):186–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj006 Kenny D, Kaniskan B, Betsy McCoach D (2014) The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociol Methods Res 44(3):486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236 Klein A, Moosbrugger H (2000) Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika 65(4):457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338 McLean K, Wolfe SE, Pratt TC (2018) Legitimacy and the life course: an age-graded examination of changes in legitimacy attitudes over time. J Res Crime Delinquency 56(1):42–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818793934 Mulvey E (2016) Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]: Subject Measures, 2000–2010. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], Ann Arbor. 14 March 2016. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2 Murphy K, Barkworth J (2014) Victim willingness to report crime to police: Does procedural justice or outcome matter most? Victims Offenders 9(2):178–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2013.872744 Murphy K, Hinds L, Fleming J (2008) Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing Soc 18(2):136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802008660 Murphy K, Murphy B, Mearns M (2010a). The 2007 crime, safety and policing in Australia survey: Survey methodology and preliminary findings. Alfred Deakin Research Institute Working Paper 16. Deakin University, Geelong, Australia Murphy K, Murphy B, Mearns M (2010b) The 2009 crime, safety and policing in Australia survey: Survey methodology and preliminary findings. Alfred Deakin Research Institute Working Paper 17. Deakin University, BurwoodGeelong, Australia Muthén B, Asparouhov T (2012) Latent variable interactions. Unpublished manuscript. https://www.statmodel.com/download/LVinteractions.pdf Myhill A, Bradford B (2012) Can police enhance public confidence by improving quality of service? Results from two surveys in England and Wales. Policing Soc 22(4):397–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2011.641551 Na C, Loughran TA, Paternoster R (2015) On the importance of treatment effect heterogeneity in experimentally-evaluated criminal justice interventions. J Quant Criminol 31(2):289–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9245-2 Nagin DS, Telep CW (2017) Procedural justice and legal compliance. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci 13:5–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113310 Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén B (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Eq Model Multidiscip J 14(4):535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396 Piquero AR, Fagan F, Mulvey EP, Steinberg L, Odgers C (2005) Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. J Crimin Law Criminol 96(1):267–298 Pósch K, Jackson J, Bradford B, MacQueen S (2020) “Truly free consent”? Clarifying the nature of police legitimacy using causal mediation analysis. J Exp Criminol 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09426-x Rengifo AF, Slocum LA, Chillar V (2019) From impressions to intentions: Direct and indirect effects of police contact on willingness to report crimes to law enforcement. J Res Crime Delinquency 56(3):412–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818817338 Rosenbaum DP, Schuck AM, Costello SK, Hawkins DF, Ring MK (2005) Attitudes toward the police: the effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police quarterly. 8(3):343–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271085 Rosin P, Soyzman E (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and cognition. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 5:296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2 Sargeant E, Murphy K, Madon N (2018) Is dissatisfaction with police inevitable? Testing an integrated model of motivational postures and procedural justice in police-citizen contacts. Police Pract Res Int J 19(2):125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2018.1418156 Schubert CA, Mulvey EP, Pitzer L (2016) Differentiating serious adolescent offender who exit the justice system from those who do not. Criminology 54(1):56–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12098 Skogan WG (2006) Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with the police. Policing Soc 16:99–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460600662098 Skogan WG (2012) Assessing asymmetry: the life course of a research project. Polic Soc 22(3):270–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2012.704035 Slocum LA (2018) The effect of prior police contact on victimization reporting: Results from the police-public contact and national crime victimization surveys. J Quant Criminol 34(2):535–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9345-x Slocum LA, Wiley S (2018) “Experience of the expected?”: Race and ethnicity differences in the effects of police contact on youth. Criminology 56(2):402–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12174 Slocum LA, Wiley S, Esbensen FA (2016) The importance of being satisfied: A longitudinal exploration of police contact, procedural injustice, and subsequent delinquency. Criminal Justice Behav 43(1):7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815609069 Sun IY, Wu Y, Li L (2019) Response to criticism: Understanding the conceptual and measurement models of legitimacy. Asian J Criminol 14(4):305–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09303-1 Sunshine J, Tyler T (2003) The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law Soc Rev 37(3):513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002 Tankebe J (2013) Viewing things differently: the dimensions of public perceptions of legitimacy. Criminology 51(1):103–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x Trinkner R (2019) Clarifying the contours of the police legitimacy measurement debate: a response to Cao and Graham. Asian J Criminol 14(4):309–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09300-4 Trinkner R, Jackson J, Tyler T (2018) Bounded authority: expanding ‘appropriate’ police behavior beyond procedural justice. Law Hum Behav 32(3):280–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000285 Tyler T (2017) Can the police enhance their popular legitimacy through their conduct? Using empirical research to inform law. Univ Ill Law Rev 2017(5):1971–2008 Tyler T (1990) Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press, Princeton Tyler T, Fagan J (2008) Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State J Crimin Law 6(1):231–275 Tyler T, Jackson J (2014) Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychol Publ Policy Law 20(1):78–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514 Tyler T, Fagan J, Geller A (2014) Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. J Empir Legal Stud 11(4):751–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12055 Vickers AJ, Altman DG (2001) Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ 39(2):1123–1124. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123 Waddington PA (1999) Police (canteen) sub-culture: An appreciation. Br J Criminol 39(2):287–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/39.2.287 Wiley SA, Esbensen FA (2016) The effect of police contact: Does official intervention result in deviance amplification? Crime Delinquency 62(3):283–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713492496