Are Stated Preferences Confirmed by Purchasing Behaviours? The Case of Fair Trade-Certified Bananas in Switzerland
Tóm tắt
As the market share of Fair Trade food products in countries of the North grows, understanding consumer preferences with regard to this recent label is becoming increasingly important. This article reports on a test of the consistency of consumers’ stated preferences, for which a survey was conducted at the place and time of actual purchase decisions. The aim of the survey was to further improve the understanding of consumers’ stated motivations for buying ‘Fair Trade’ and ‘organic Fair Trade’ bananas in Switzerland. Hypothetical questions with double dichotomous choices were used to compare two types of bananas – conventional and labelled – and to assess the average stated willingness-to-pay (WTP) for Fair Trade-labelled bananas. The results show that Fair Trade is largely accepted in Switzerland and that the premium for purchasing such products is influenced by age, the number of young children and the perception of the Fair Trade label. I then used a comparative test of field observations and stated preferences for bananas to measure inconsistency in choices. This comparison reveals that less than one-fifth of the answers are in principle inconsistent. These results point to the importance of confidence in the Fair Trade labels if consumers’ purchases are to increase.
Tài liệu tham khảo
C. Arnot, P. Boxall, and S. Cash. (2006) Do Ethical Consumers Care About Price? A Revealed Preference Analysis of Fair Trade Coffee Purchases. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54:555-565.
I. Bateman, I. Langford, R. Turner, K. Willis, and G. Garrod (1995) Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics, 12:161-179.
J. Blend and E. Ravenswaay (1999) Measuring consumer demand for ecolabeled apples. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(5):1072-1077.
A. Browne, P. Harris, A. Hofny-Collins, N. Pasiecznik, and R. Wallace (2000) Organic production and ethical trade: de¯nition practice and links. Food Policy, 25:69-89.
Trudy A. Cameron (1991) Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys. Land Economics, 67(4): 413-421.
Cameron, T. A. and M. James: 1987, ‘Estimating Willingness to Pay from Survey Data: An Alternative Pre-Test-Market Evaluation Procedure’, Journal of Marketing Research 24(4), 389-395.
T. A. Cameron and J. Quiggin (1994) Estimating Using Contingent Valuation Data from a “Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up” Questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27:218-234.
J. Caswell and E. Mojduszka (1996) Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78: 1248-1253.
2008, Repères: Géoéconomie du commerce équitable. Courrier de la planète 87, 32–33.
Ronald G. Cummings, Glenn W. Harrison, and E. E. RutstrÄom (1995) Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Compatible? American Economic Review, 85(1):260-266.
F. de Ferran and K. Grunert (2007) French Fair Trade coffee buyers’ purchasing motives: an exploratory study using means-end chains analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 18:218-229.
P. De Pelsmacker, L. Driesen, and G. Rayp (2005) Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair-Trade Coffee. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2):363-385.
Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International: 2008, Annual Report 2007 – An Inspiration for a Change.
Elise Gozan, Fred Kuchler, and Lorraine Mitchell. (2001) Economics of Food Labeling. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24:117-184.
W. Hanemann (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete re-sponses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3):332-341.
M. Hanemann, J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen (1991) Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4):1255-1263.
Hurvich, C. M. and C.-L. Tsai: 1995, ‘Model Selection for Extended Quasi-Likelihood Models in Small Samples’, Biometrics 51(3), 1077–1084. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2533006.
Magnus Johannesson, Bengt Liljas, and Per-Olov Johansson (1998) An experimental comparison ofdichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions. Applied Economics, 30(5):643-647.
Krier, J.-M.: 2008, ‘Fair Trade 2007: New Facts and Figures from an Ongoing Success Story: A Report on Fair Trade in 33 Consumer Countries’, On behalf of DAWS – Dutch Association of World Shops, Netherlands.
M. Loureiro and J. Lotade (2005a) Interviewer Effects on the Valuation of Goods with Ethical and Environmental Attributes. Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 30:49-72.
M. Loureiro and J. Lotade (2005b) Do Fair Trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecological Economics, 53:129-138.
M. Loureiro, J. McCluskey, and R. Mittelhammer (2002) Will consumers pay a premium for the eco-labeled apples? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(2):203-219.
M. Loureiro, J. McCluskey, and R. Mittelhammer (2003) Are stated preferences good predictors of market behavior? Land Economics, 79(1):44-55.
Jayson L. Lusk and Darren Hudson (2004) Willingness-to-Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(2):152-169.
G. S. Maddala (1986) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press.
Munro, A. and N. Hanley: 1999, Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, Chapter Information, Uncertainty, and Contingent Valuation. Oxford University Press, Cambridge, pp 258–279.
Palma Torres, A. and F. De Sousa-Santos: 2006, ‘Le Commerce équitable en France : Point de situation sur les flux économiques générés en 2004’, Technical report, étude commandée par le ministère des Affaires étrangères auprès du cabinet Altervia Consulting, Mars.
R. Pfeifer (2006) Mûrs pour le commerce équitable, in Christina Bargholz, Sacrée Banane! Profits et Passions, pages 323-412. Vevey: Foundation Alimentarium.
Laura T. Raynolds (2000) Re-Embedding Global Agriculture: The International Organic and Fair Trade Movements. Agriculture and Human Values, 17:297-309.
Rode, J., R. Hogarth and M. Le Menestrel: 2008, ‘Ethical Differentiation and Market Behavior: An Experimental Approach’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 66(1), 265–280.
Rousu, M. and J. Corrigan: 2008, ‘Estimating the Welfare Loss to Consumers When Food Labels Do Not Adequately Inform: An Application to Fair Trade Certification’, Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 6(1), Article 3.
Shogren, J. F.: 2006, Handbook of Environmental Economics, Chapter 19 – Experimental Methods and Valuation (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
Didier Tagbata and Lucie Sirieix (2008) Measuring consumer’s willingness to pay for organic and Fair Trade products. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5):479-490.
Waridel, L. and S. Teitelbaum: 1999, Fair Trade: Contributing to Equitable Commerce in Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, and France. Research Report, Equiterre.