Are Robots Ready to Deliver Autism Interventions? A Comprehensive Review
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
American Psychological Association (2001) Policy statement on evidence-based practice in psychology. http://www.apa.org/practice/ebpstatement.pdf . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
Andreae H, Andreae P, Low J, Brown D (2014) A study of auti: a socially assistive robotic toy. In: Proceedings of the conference on interaction design and children. ACM, New York, p 245–248
Begum M, Serna R, Kontak D, Allspaw J, Kuczynski J, Suarez J, Yanco H (2015) Measuring the efficacy of robots in autism therapy: How informative are standard HRI metrics? In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction
Bekele ET, Lahiri U, Swanson AR, Crittendon JA, Warren ZE, Sarkar N (2013) A step towards developing adaptive robot-mediated intervention architecture (ARIA) for children with autism. Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 21:289–299
Bekele E, Crittendon JA, Swanson A, Sarkar N, Warren ZE (2014) Pilot clinical application of an adaptive robotic system for young children with autism. Autism 18:598–608
Bird G, Leighton J, Press C, Heyes C (2007) Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proc Biol Sci 274(1628):3027–3031
Boccanfuso L, O’Kane JM (2010) Adaptive robot design with hand and face tracking for use in autism therapy. In: International conference on social robotics, p 265–274
Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8(2):94–103
Cabibihan JJ, Javed H, Ang M Jr, Aljunied SM (2013) Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 5(4):593–618
Chaminade T, Fonseca DD, Rosset D, Lutscher E, Cheng G, Deruelle C (2012) fMRI study of young adults with autism interacting with a humanoid robot. In: International symposium on robot and human interactive communications, p 380–385
Constantino JN, Gruber CP (2005) Social responsiveness scale manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles. http://www.wpspublish.com/app/ . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
Constantino JN, Davis SA, Todd RD, Schindler MK, Gross MM (2003) Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: comparison of the social responsiveness scale with the autism diagnostic interview-revised. J Autism Dev Disord 33(4):427–433
Costa S, Soares F, Santos C, Ferreira MJ, Moreira F, Pereira AP, Cunha F (2011) An approach to promote social and communication behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorders: robot based intervention. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International symposium on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE, Atlanta, p 101–106
Costescu CA, Vanderborght B, David DO (2015) Reversal learning task in children with autism spectrum disorder: a robot-based approach. J Autism Dev Disord 45(11):3715–3725
David D, Matu S, David OA (2014) Robot-based psychotherapy: concepts development, state of the art, and new directions. Int J Cogn Ther 7(2):192–210
Diehl J, Schmitt L, Crowell CR, Villano M (2012) The clinical use of robots for children with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Res Autism Spectr Disord 6(1):249–262
Diehl J, Crowell CR, Villano M, Wier K, Tang K, Riek L (2014) Clinical applications of robots in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and treatment. In: A comprehensive guide to autism. Springer, New York
Duquette A, Michaud F, Mercier H (2008) Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Auton Robots 24(1):147–157
Feil-Seifer J, Mataric MJ (2008) B3IA: a control architecture for autonomous robot-assisted behavior intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: International conference on human–robot interaction, p 328–333
Feil-Seifer J, Mataric MJ (2010) Using proxemics to evaluate human–robot interaction. In: International conference on human–robot interaction, p 143–144
Fujimoto I, Matsumoto T, Silva PRSD, Kobayashi M, Higashi M (2011) Mimicking and evaluating human motion to improve the imitation skill of children with autism through a robot. Int J Soc Robot 3:349–357
Giannopulu I (2013) Multimodal cognitive nonverbal and verbal interactions: the neurorehabilitation of autistic children via mobile toy robots. Int J Adv Life Sci 5(3, 4):214–222
Goodrich MA, Colton M, Brinton B, Fujiki M, Atherton JA, Ricks D, Maxfield MH, Acerson A (2012) Incorporating a robot into an autism therapy team. IEEE Intell Syst Mag 27(2):52–59
Greczek J, Kaszubski E, Atrash A, Matari M (2014) Graded cueing feedback in robot-mediated imitation practice for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE, p 561–566
Grynszpan O, Weiss PL, Perez-Diaz F, Gal E (2014) Innovative technology-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. Autism 18:346–361
Harris SL, Delmolino L (2002) Applied behavior analysis: its application in the treatment of autism and related disorders in young children. Infants Young Child 14:11–18
Horner RH, Carr EG, Halle J, McGee G, Odom S, Wolery M (2005) The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Except Child 71:165–179
Huskens B, Verschuur R, Gillesen J, Didden R, Barakova E (2013) Promoting question-asking in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders: effectiveness of a robot intervention compared to a human–trainer intervention. Dev Neurorehabil 16:345–356
Jordan K, King M, Hellersteth S, Wiren A, Mulligan H (2012) Robotic technology for teaching adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a feasibility study. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology. ACM, Singapore, p 24:1–24:4
Kazdin AE (2008) Evidence-based treatment and practice: new opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. Am Psychol 63:146–159
Kelley JF (1984) An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Trans Inf Syst 2(1):26–41
Kim ES, Scassellati B (2012) Bridging the research gap: making HRI useful to individuals with autism. Hum Robot Interact 1(1):26–54
Kim ES, Berkovits LD, Bernier EP, Leyzberg D, Shic F, Paul R, Scassellati B (2013) Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Autism Dev Disord 43:1038–1049
Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yasuda Y (2007) Children–robot interaction: a pilot study in autism therapy. Prog Brain Res 164:385–400
Lee J, Takehashi H, Nagai C, Obinata G, Stefanov D (2012) Which robot features can stimulate better responses from children with autism in robot-assisted therapy? Adv Robot Syst 9:1–6
Lord C, Rutter M, Goode S, Heemsbergen J, Jordan H, Mawhood L, Schopler E (1989) Autism diagnostic observation schedule: a standardized observation of communicative and social behavior. J Autism Dev Disord 19:185–212
Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore P, Risi S (2001) Autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles. http://www.wpspublish.com/app/ . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
MAG Initiative (2012) Autism spectrum disorders: guide to evidence based interventions. http://autismguidelines.dmh.mo.gov/documents/Interventions.pdf . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
Mesibov G, Shea V, Schopler E (2005) The TEACCH approach to autism spectrum disorders. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
Nathan PE, Gorman JM (2007) A guide to treatments that work, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Odom SL (2013) Technology-aided instruction and intervention (TAII) fact sheet. The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group, Chapel Hill. http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/sites/autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/files/2014-EBP-Report.pdf . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
Odom SL, Brantlinger E, Gersten R, Horner RD, Thompson B, Harris K (2004) Quality indicators for research in special education and guidelines for evidence-based practices: executive summary. Council for Exceptional Children Division for Research, Arlington
Odom S, Collet-Klingenberg L, Rogers S, Hatton D (2010) Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Prev School Fail 54:275–282
Pennington R, Saadatzi MN, Welch KC, Scott R (2014) Using robot-assisted instruction to teach students with intellectual disabilities to use personal narrative in text messages. J Spec Educ Technol 29(4):4958
Pierno A, Mari M, Lusher D, Castiello U (2008) Robotic movement elicits visuomotor priming in children with autism. Neuropsychologia 31:448–454
Pioggia G, Sica ML, Ferro M, Igliozzi R, Muratori F, Ahluwalia A, Rossi DD (2007) Human–robot interaction in autism: face, an android-based social therapy. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE, Jeju, p 605–612
Pop CA, Petrule A, Pintea S, Peca A, Simut R, Vanderborght B, David DO (2013a) Imitation and social behaviors of children with ASD in interaction with robonova. A series of single case experiments. Transylv J Psychol 14(1):71–93
Pop CA, Simut RE, Pintea S, Saldien J, Rusu AS, Vanderfaeillie J, David DO, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2013b) Social robots vs. computer display: Does the way social stories are delivered make a difference for their effectiveness on ASD children? Educ Comput Res 49(3):381–401
Reed FD, Hyman SR, Hirst JM (2011) Applications of technology to teach social skills to children with autism. Dev Neurorehabil 5:1003–1010
Reichow B, Volkmar FR, Cicchetti DV (2008) Method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism. Autism Dev Disord 38:1311–1319
Riek LD (2012) Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Int J Hum Robot Interact 1(1):119–136
Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2014) Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: novel play scenario implementations with children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 6:397–415
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Billard A (2005) Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills. Univers Access Inf Soc 4:105–120
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dubowski J (2006) Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot? Interact Stud 7:479–512
Rogers SJ, Dawson G (2012) Play and engagement in early autism: the early start Denver model. www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/edsl/esdm/training.html . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
Rogers SJ, Vismara LA (2008) Evidence-based comprehensive treatments for early autism. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 37:8–38
Rutter M, Bailey A, Lord C, Berument SK (2003) Social communication questionnaire. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles. http://www.wpspublish.com/app/ . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
Scassellati B (2005) Quantitative metrics of social response for autism diagnosis. In: International workshop on robots and human interactive communication, p 585–590
Scassellati B, Admoni H, Mataric M (2012) Robots for use in autism research. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14:275–294
Schopler E, Reichler RJ, Renner BR (1988) The childhood autism rating scale (CARS) manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles. http://www.wpspublish.com/app/ . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Ismail L, Hanapiah FA, Mohamed S, Piah HA, Zahair N (2012) Initial response in HRI—a case study on evaluation of child with autism spectrum disorders interacting with a humanoid robot NAO. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on robotics and intelligent sensors. Elsevier, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, p 1448–1455
Srinivasan S, Lynch KA, Bubela DJ (2013) Effect of interactions between a child and a robot on the imitation and praxis performance of typically developing children and a child with autism: a preliminary study. Percept Motor Skills Phys Dev Meas 116(3):885–904
Tapus A, Peca A, Aly A, Pop C, Jisa L, Pintea S, Rusu AS, David DO (2012) Children with autism social engagement in interaction with NAO, an imitative robot. Interact Stud 13(3):315–347
Vanderborght B, Simut R, Saldien J, Pop C, Rusu AS, Pintea S, Lefeber D, David DO (2012) Using the social robot probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD. Interact Stud 13:348–372
Wainer J, Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K (2014) Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. Auton Ment Dev 6(3):183–199
Wilczynski S, Green G, Ricciardi J, Boyd B, Hume A, Ladd M, Odom S, Rue H (2009) National standards report: The national standards project addressing the need for evidence-based practice guidelines for autism spectrum disorders. National Autism Center. http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/affiliates/reports.php . Accessed 3 Feb 2015
Wong C, Odom S, Hume K, Cox AW, Fettig A, Kucharczyk S, Brock ME, Plavnick JB, Fleury VP, Schultz TR (2014) Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group, Chapel Hill. http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/sites/autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/files/2014-EBP-Report.pdf . Accessed 3 Feb 2015