Người Nhập Cư Có Bị Cô Lập Xã Hội Hay Không? Đánh Giá Về Quan Hệ Láng Giềng Tại Các Thành Phố Canada

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 10 - Trang 217-244 - 2009
Brian Ray1, Valerie Preston2
1Department of Geography, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
2Department of Geography, York University, Toronto, Canada

Tóm tắt

Gần đây, truyền thông đã bày tỏ lo ngại về sự tập trung rõ rệt và sự cô lập xã hội của người nhập cư tại các khu vực trung tâm và ngoại ô trong các thành phố lớn ở Canada. Bài báo này so sánh và đối chiếu tần suất cũng như bản chất của các mối liên hệ xã hội dựa trên khu phố giữa ba nhóm người nhập cư được phân biệt theo thời gian họ đến Canada và những người sinh ra tại Canada. Chúng tôi bắt đầu bằng việc phác thảo các mối quan hệ gia đình, bạn bè và quen biết mà người nhập cư xây dựng và cho rằng các mạng lưới của họ đa dạng văn hóa và bị chi phối bởi mối quan hệ quen biết. Trong bối cảnh này, tình bạn thân thiết rất ít phát triển giữa các hàng xóm, ngay cả đối với những người mới đến gần đây. Thay vào đó, sự tương tác giữa các hàng xóm chủ yếu bao gồm các tương tác ngẫu nhiên giữa các cá nhân, thường liên quan đến việc cung cấp các hình thức giúp đỡ thông thường. Mặc dù có tính chất thoáng qua và thường lệ, các mối quan hệ xã hội với hàng xóm dẫn đến phần lớn mọi người thể hiện mức độ gắn bó mạnh mẽ với khu phố của họ. Do đó, chúng tôi cho rằng khu phố là một nơi thường bị đánh giá thấp trong việc hiểu về sự bao gồm xã hội.

Từ khóa

#người nhập cư #cô lập xã hội #quan hệ hàng xóm #Canada #tương tác xã hội

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class and change in an urban community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Balakrishnan, T. R., & Gyimah, S. O. (2003). Spatial residential patterns of selected ethnic groups in Canada 2001: Their significance and policy implications. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 35(1), 113–134. Bridge, G., Forrest, R., & Holland, E. (2004). Neighbouring: A review of the evidence. Bristol: University of Bristol, Centre for Neighbourhood Research. Campbell, K. E., & Lee, B. A. (1992). Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need or time? Social Forces, 70(4), 1077–1100. Canada, CIC (Citizenship and Immigration Canada). (2003). Settlement and integration: A sense of belonging—‘feeling at home’. Government response to the report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration. Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration Canada. Canada, Standing committee on Citizenship and Immigration. (2003). Settlement and integration: A sense of belong “feeling at home”. Ottawa: Parliament of Canada. Carey, E. (2001). High-rise ghettos; in Toronto, visible minorities are pushed into ‘pockets of poverty’. Toronto Star, Feb 3, p. 01. Cater, J., & Jones, T. (1989). Social geography. London: Arnold. Choko, M., & Harris, R. (1990). The local culture of property: A comparative history of housing tenure in Montréal and Toronto. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(1), 73–95. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. (2005). Facts and figures 2004: Immigration overview—permanent and temporary residents. Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration Canada. Davies, W., & Herbert, D. (1993). Communities within cities, an urban social geography. London: Bellhaven. Ellis, M., Wright, R., & Parks, V. (2004). Work together, live apart? Geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and at work. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(3), 620–637. Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends: personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fong, E., & Wilkes, R. (2003). Racial and ethnic patterns in Canada. Sociological Forum, 18(4), 577–602. Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143. Galster, G. (2001). On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2111–2124. Galster, G., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 7–43. Galster, G., Metzger, K., & Waite, R. (1999). Neighborhood opportunity structures of immigrant populations, 1980 and 1999. Housing Policy Debate, 10(2), 395–442. Gans, H. (1962). The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free. Germain, A., & Gagnon, J. E. (1999). Is neighbourhood a black box? A reply to galster, metzger and waite. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 8(2), 172–184. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. Gregg, A. (2006). Identity Crisis. Walrus Magazine, pp. 38–47 Hagan, J. M. (1998). Social networks, gender, and immigrant incorporation: resources and constraints. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 55–67. Hallman, H. W. (1984). Neighborhoods: Their place in urban life. Beverly Hills: Sage. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277–311. Harney, R. F. (1985). Ethnicity and neighbourhoods. In R. F. Harney (Ed.), Gathering place: Peoples and neighbourhoods of Toronto, 1834–1945 (pp. 1–24). Toronto: Multicultural History Society of Ontario. Hawkins, F. (1989). Critical years in immigration: Canada and Australia compared. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Henning, C., & Lieberg, M. (1996). Strong ties or weak ties? Neighbourhood networks in a new perspective. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 13(3), 3–26. Hiebert, D., Germain, A., Murdie, R., Preston, V., Renaud, J., Rose, D., et al. (2006). The housing situation and needs of recent immigrants in the Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver CMAs: An overview. CMHC research report. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Hou, F. (2004). Recent immigration and the formation of visible minority neighborhoods in Canada’s largest cities. Analytical studies research paper series. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Hum, D., & Simpson, W. (2004). Economic integration of immigrants to Canada: A short survey. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 13(1), 46–61. Hunter, A. (1979). The urban neighborhood: Its analytical and social contexts. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14(3), 267–288. Iacovetta, F. (1992). Such hardworking people: Italian immigrants in postwar Toronto. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Kearns, A., & Parkinson, M. (2001). The significance of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2103–2110. Keller, S. (1968). The urban neighborhood: A sociological perspective. New York: Random. Knoke, D., & Burke, P. J. (1980). Log-linear models. Beverly Hills: Sage. Kunz, J. L. (2005). Orienting newcomers to Canadian society: Social capital and settlement. In P. R. Initiative (Ed.), Social capital in action: Thematic policy studies (pp. 52–65). Ottawa: Policy Research Initiative. Li, P. (2003). Destination Canada: Immigration debates and issues. Don Mills: Oxford University Press. Marcus, C. C. (1995). House as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Berkeley: Conari. Marshall, K. (2006). Converging gender roles. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 7(7), 5–17. Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (2001). Ethnic differences in urban neighbour relations in Israel. Urban Studies, 38(11), 1943–1952. Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press. Michelson, W. (1985). From sun to sun: Daily obligations and community structure in the lives of employed women and their families. Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld. Pacione, M. (1984). Neighbourhood communities in Glasgow. Scottish Geographical Magazine, pp. 1969–1981. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unun : Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. Ray, B., & Rose, D. (2000). Cities of the everyday: Socio-spatial perspectives on gender, difference, and diversity. In T. Bunting & P. Filion (Eds.), Canadian cities in transition, the twenty-first century (pp. 502–524). Don Mills: Oxford University Press. Rothenberg, T. (1995). ‘And she told two friends’: Lesbians creating urban social space. In D. Bell & G. Valentine (Eds.), Mapping desire, geographies of sexualities (pp. 165–181). London: Routledge. Schellenberg, G. (2004). Immigrants in Canada’s census metropolitan areas. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Statistics Canada. (2004). 2003 general social survey cycle 17: Social engagement. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Sturino, F. (1990). Forging the chain: A case study of Italian Immigration to North America, 1880–1930. Toronto: Multicultural History Society of Ontario. Suttles, G. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. van Vliet, W. (1985). The role of housing type, household density and neighborhood density in peer interaction and social adjustment. In J. F. Wohlwill & W. van Vliet (Eds.), Habitats for children: Impacts of density (pp. 165–200). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Ward, D. (1989). Poverty, ethnicity, and the American City, 1840–1925: Changing conceptions of the slum and the ghetto. New York: Cambridge University Press. Webber, M. M. (1963). Order in diversity: Community without propinquity. In L. Wingo (Ed.), Cities and space (pp. 25–54). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Wellman, B. (1996). Are personal communities local? A Dumptarian reconsideration. Social Networks, 18(3), 347–354. Wellman, B., & Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, neighborhoods and communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14(3), 363–390. Zelinsky, W., & Lee, B. A. (1998). Heteroloclaism: An alternative model of the sociospatial behavior of immigrant ethnic communities. International Journal of Population Geography, 4(4), 281–298. Zucchi, J. (1988). Italians in Toronto. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.