Approaching prosthesis infection environment: Development of an innovative in vitro Staphylococcus aureus biofilm model

Biofilm - Tập 5 - Trang 100120 - 2023
Fabien Lamret1, Anaïs Lemaire1, Manon Lagoutte1, Jennifer Varin-Simon1, Laura Abraham1, Marius Colin1,2, Julien Braux1,3, Frédéric Velard1,3, Sophie C. Gangloff1,2, Fany Reffuveille1,2
1Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Biomatériaux et Inflammation en Site Osseux, BIOS EA 4691, SFR Cap Santé, 51097, Reims, France
2Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Service de Microbiologie, UFR Pharmacie, 51097, Reims, France
3UFR d'Odontologie, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, 51100, Reims, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Tande, 2014, Prosthetic joint infection, Clin Microbiol Rev, 27, 302, 10.1128/CMR.00111-13 Josse, 2019, Interaction between staphylococcal biofilm and bone: how does the presence of biofilm promote prosthesis loosening?, Front Microbiol, 10, 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01602 Murillo, 2015, The changing epidemiology of bacteraemic osteoarticular infections in the early 21st century, Clin Microbiol Infect, 21, 254.e1, 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.09.007 Potera, 1999, Forging a link between biofilms and disease, Science, 283, 1837, 10.1126/science.283.5409.1837 Shoji, 2020, Biofilms in periprosthetic joint infections: a review of diagnostic modalities, current treatments, and future directions, J Knee Surg, 33, 119, 10.1055/s-0040-1701214 Kaplan, 2014, Recent lessons for the management of bone and joint infections, J Infect, 68, S51, 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.09.014 Parry, 2014, The challenge of methicillin resistant staphylococcal infection after total hip replacement: overlooked or overstated?, Bone Joint Lett J, 96-B, 60, 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34333 Stewart, 2008, Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms, Nat Rev Microbiol, 6, 199, 10.1038/nrmicro1838 Karygianni, 2020, Biofilm matrixome: extracellular components in structured microbial communities, Trends Microbiol, 28, 668, 10.1016/j.tim.2020.03.016 Zapotoczna, 2016, Untangling the diverse and redundant mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation, PLoS Pathog, 12, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005671 Arciola, 2018, Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion, Nat Rev Microbiol, 16, 397, 10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y Hall-Stoodley, 2004, Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases, Nat Rev Microbiol, 2, 95, 10.1038/nrmicro821 Mashruwala, 2017, Impaired respiration elicits SrrAB-dependent programmed cell lysis and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus, Elife, 6, 10.7554/eLife.23845 Oliveira, 2018, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections on implants, J Hosp Infect, 98, 111, 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.11.008 Reffuveille, 2018, Bone environment influences irreversible adhesion of a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strain, Front Microbiol, 9, 2865, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02865 Crabbé, 2019, Antimicrobial tolerance and metabolic adaptations in microbial biofilms, Trends Microbiol, 27, 850, 10.1016/j.tim.2019.05.003 Bidossi, 2020, Ability of adhesion and biofilm formation of pathogens of periprosthetic joint infections on titanium-niobium nitride (TiNbN) ceramic coatings, J Orthop Surg Res, 15, 90, 10.1186/s13018-020-01613-w Lamret, 2021, Staphylococcus aureus strain-dependent biofilm formation in bone-like environment, Front Microbiol, 12, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.714994 François, 1998, Role of plasma and extracellular matrix proteins in the physiopathology of foreign body infections, Ann Vasc Surg, 12, 34, 10.1007/s100169900112 Foster, 2014, Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus, Nat Rev Microbiol, 12, 49, 10.1038/nrmicro3161 Robey, 2008, Chapter 6. The composition of bone, 32, 10.1002/9780470623992.ch6 Gibon, 2017, The biological response to orthopaedic implants for joint replacement: Part I: metals, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 105, 2162, 10.1002/jbm.b.33734 Gibon, 2017, The biological response to orthopedic implants for joint replacement. II: polyethylene, ceramics, PMMA, and the foreign body reaction, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 105, 1685, 10.1002/jbm.b.33676 Nandakumar, 2013, Characteristics of bacterial biofilm associated with implant material in clinical practice, Polym J, 45, 137, 10.1038/pj.2012.130 Reffuveille, 2017, Staphylococcus aureus biofilms and their impact on the medical Field, Rise Virulence Antibiot Resist Staphylococcus aureus, 10.5772/66380 Liu, 2020, Environmental factors modulate biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus, Sci Prog, 103, 10.1177/0036850419898659 Bjarnsholt, 2021, The importance of understanding the infectious microenvironment, Lancet Infect Dis, 21, S1473 Tenover, 2009, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300: origin and epidemiology, J Antimicrob Chemother, 64, 441, 10.1093/jac/dkp241 Horsburgh, 2002, SigmaB modulates virulence determinant expression and stress resistance: characterization of a functional RsbU strain derived from Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4, J Bacteriol, 184, 5457, 10.1128/JB.184.19.5457-5467.2002 Braux, 2020, CFTR-deficient pigs display alterations of bone microarchitecture and composition at birth, J Cyst Fibros, 19, 466, 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.10.023 Chan, 1998, The Staphylococcus aureus alternative sigma factor SigmaB controls the environmental stress response but not starvation survival or pathogenicity in a mouse abscess model, J Bacteriol, 10.1128/JB.180.23.6082-6089.1998 Lauderdale, 2009, Interconnections between sigma B, agr, and proteolytic activity in Staphylococcus aureus biofilm maturation, Infect Immun, 77, 1623, 10.1128/IAI.01036-08 Archer, 2011, Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease, Virulence, 2, 445, 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 Tan, 2018, Therapeutic targeting of the Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) system, Front Microbiol, 9, 55, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00055 Podlesek, 2020, The DNA damage inducible SOS response is a key player in the generation of bacterial persister cells and population wide tolerance, Front Microbiol, 11 Rice, 2007, The CidA murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in Staphylococcus aureus, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 8113, 10.1073/pnas.0610226104 McCarthy, 2015, Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus, Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 5, 1, 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00001 Pietrocola, 2016, Molecular interactions of human plasminogen with fibronectin-binding protein B (FnBPB), a fibrinogen/fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus, J Biol Chem, 291, 18148, 10.1074/jbc.M116.731125 McCourt, 2014, Fibronectin-binding proteins are required for biofilm formation by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain LAC, FEMS (Fed Eur Microbiol Soc) Microbiol Lett, 353, 157, 10.1111/1574-6968.12424 Nourbakhsh, 2016, Detection of genes involved in biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates, GMS Hyg Infect Control, 11, Doc07 Masters, 2019, Evolving concepts in bone infection: redefining “biofilm”, “Acute vs. Chronic Osteomyelitis”, “the Immune Proteome” and “Local Antibiotic Therapy.”, Bone Res, 7, 20, 10.1038/s41413-019-0061-z Zeller, 2009, Continuous cefazolin infusion to treat bone and joint infections: clinical efficacy, feasibility, safety, and serum and bone concentrations, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 53, 883, 10.1128/AAC.00389-08 Mg, 1973, Bactericidal activity and pharmacology of cefazolin, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 4 Schurman, 1978, Cefazolin concentrations in bone and synovial fluid, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 60, 359, 10.2106/00004623-197860030-00016 Dapunt, 2016, The osteoblast as an inflammatory cell: production of cytokines in response to bacteria and components of bacterial biofilms, BMC Muscoskel Disord, 17, 243, 10.1186/s12891-016-1091-y Midorikawa, 2003, Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to innate antimicrobial peptides, β-defensins and CAP18, expressed by human keratinocytes, Infect Immun, 71, 3730, 10.1128/IAI.71.7.3730-3739.2003 Lamret, 2022, Human osteoblast-conditioned media can influence Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation, Int J Mol Sci, 23, 10.3390/ijms232214393