Approaches to developing the capacity of health policy analysis institutes: a comparative case study

Health Research Policy and Systems - Tập 10 - Trang 1-9 - 2012
Sara Bennett1, Adrijana Corluka1, Jane Doherty2, Viroj Tangcharoensathien3
1Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
2International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
3Independent researcher and part-time lecturer, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, South Africa

Tóm tắt

To review and assess (i) the factors that facilitate the development of sustainable health policy analysis institutes in low and middle income countries and (ii) the nature of external support for capacity development provided to such institutes. Comparative case studies of six health policy analysis institutes (3 from Asia and 3 from Africa) were conducted. In each region an NGO institute, an institute linked to government and a university based institute were included. Data collection comprised document review, semi-structured interviews with stakeholders and discussion of preliminary findings with institute staff. The findings are organized around four key themes: (i) Financial resources: three of the institutes had received substantial external grants at start-up, however two of these institutes subsequently collapsed. At all but one institute, reliance upon short term, donor funding, created high administrative costs and unpredictability. (ii) Human resources: the retention of skilled human resources was perceived to be key to institute success but was problematic at all but one institute. In particular staff often moved to better paid positions elsewhere once having acquired necessary skills and experience, leaving remaining senior staff with heavy workloads. (iii) Governance and management: board structures and roles varied according to the nature of institute ownership. Boards made important contributions to organizational capacity through promoting continuity, independence and fund raising. Routine management systems were typically perceived to be strong. (iv) Networks: linkages to policy makers helped promote policy influences. External networks with other research organizations, particularly where these were longer term institutional collaborations helped promote capacity. The development of strong in-country analytical and research capacity to guide health policy development is critical, yet many health policy analysis institutes remain very fragile. A combination of more strategic planning, active recruitment and retention strategies, and longer term, flexible funding, for example through endowments, needs to be promoted. Specific recommendations to funders and institutes are provided.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Innvaer S: Health policy-makers perception of their use of evidence: a systematic revie. J Health Serv Res Pol. 2002, 7 (4): 239-244. 10.1258/135581902320432778. Paina L, Peters DH: Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems. Health Policy Plan. 2011, first published online August 5, 2011 doi:10.1093/heapol/czr054. Easterly W: Are aid agencies improving. Economic Policy. 2007, 22 (52): 633-678. 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2007.00187.x. DFID: DFID Research Strategy: 2008-2013. 2008, London: DFID World Health Organization: Bamako Call to Action on Research for Health in Global Ministerial Forum on Research for Health: Bamako. 2008, Mali: WHO McGann JG: Best practices for funding and evaluating think tanks and policy research. Prepared for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. 2006, Ambler: McGann Associates IDRC: The Think Tank Initiative in Review. 2010, Ottawa: International Development Research Center World Health Organization: World Report on Knowledge for Better Health. 2004, Geneva: World Health Organization Green A, Bennett S: Sound choices: enhancing capacity for evidence-informed health policy. 2007, Geneva: WHO Nuyens Y: No Development without Research: A challenge for research capacity strengthening. 2005, Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research Bennett S: Building the field of health policy and systems research: an agenda for action. PLoS Med. 2011, 8 (8): p. e1001081 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001081 Pop D: Policy Research Fellowships as Knowledge Creation Endeavors: Case study of the Open Society Institute's International Policy Fellowship Program. 2005, Budapest: Centre for Policy Studies, Central European University Struyk RJ, Kohagen K, Miller C: Were Bosnian policy research organizations more effective in 2006 than in 2003? Did technical assistance play a role. Policy Adm Dev. 2007, 27 (5): 426-438. James S: Influencing government policy making. Banking on Knowledge: The Genesis of the Global Development Network. Edited by: Stone D. 2000, Warwick: Warwick Universityl Struyk RJ: Managing Think Tanks: Practical Gudiance for Maturing Organizations. 2002, Budapest: Open Society Institute Dror Y: Required break throughs in think tank. Policy Sci. 1984, 16 (3): 199-225. 10.1007/BF00138510. Osman M, Nolla NE: The politics of independence: can government think tanks act independently?. The International Conference on the role of think tanks in developing countries: challenges and solutions. 2009, Cairo Ali SM: Sustainable Development Policy Institute: Pakistan's case study. 2005, Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute, 16- Bennett S: Influencing policy change: the experience of health think tanks in low and middle income countries. Health Policy and Planning, forthcoming DFID: Research Programme Consortia: Guidance note on capacity development. 2009, London: UK government, D.f.I. Development, Editor Lusthaus C, Adrien M-H, Perstinger M: Capacity Development: Definitions, Issues and Implications for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. Universalia Occassional Paper. 1999, Montreal: Universalia Gerring J: Case study research: Principles and practice. 2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Gonzalez-Block MA, Mills A: Assessing capacity for health policy and systems research in low and middle income countries. Health Res Policy Syst. 2003, 1 (1): 1-10.1186/1478-4505-1-1. Nchinda TC: Research capacity strengthening in the South. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 54 (11): 1699-711. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00338-0. Mayhew SH, Doherty J, Pitayarangsarit S: Developing health systems research capacities through north-south partnership: an evaluation of collaboration with South Africa and Thailand. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008, 6: 8-10.1186/1478-4505-6-8. Lansang MA, Dennis R: Building capacity in health research in the developing world. Bull World Health Organ. 2004, 82 (10): 764-70. Brinkerhoff D, Goldsmith A: Promoting the sustainability of development institutions: A framework for strategy. World Development. 1992, 20 (3): 360-383. Gustafson DJ: Developing sustainable institutions: lessons from a cross-case analsyis of 24 agricultural extension programme. Pub Admin Dev. 1994, 14 (2): 121-134. 10.1002/pad.4230140202. Johnson H, Wilson G: Institutional sustainability as learning. Dev Prac. 1999, 9 (1/2): 43-55.