Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: an overview of the conceptual landscape

Business Strategy and the Environment - Tập 15 Số 2 - Trang 103-117 - 2006
Judy Brown1, Michael Fraser1
1Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Tóm tắt

AbstractIn recent years there has been a marked resurgence of interest in the areas of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social and environmental accounting (SEA) among business, governments, public policymakers, investors, unions, environmentalists and others. While at one level there appears to be widespread agreement that CSR and SEA are worthy topics of attention, different groups have very different understandings of these fields. This article provides an analysis of these differences by comparing three broad approaches to SEA: the business case, stakeholder‐accountability and critical theory approaches. It also responds to concerns a number of commentators have expressed regarding the current dominance of ‘business case’ perspectives. While not seeking to impose on readers a ‘correct’ way of viewing SEA and CSR, exposure to competing perspectives is viewed as one way of challenging us to think more reflectively about the frames available to us and their implications for the social realities we construct, embed or seek to change. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

AccountAbility., 2003, AA1000 Assurance Standard

Accounting Standards Steering Committee, 1975, The Corporate Report

AdamsCA.2001.A critique of reporting on ethical social and environmental issues: the case of ICI. Paper presented at the APIRA Conference Adelaide 2001.

Arnold PJ., 1990, The state and political theory in corporate social disclosure research: a response to Guthrie and Parker, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 177

10.1016/0361-3682(94)90014-0

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(200001/02)9:1<1::AID-BSE227>3.0.CO;2-H

Bartelmus P., 1999, Greening the National Accounts: Approach and Policy Use

10.1108/09513579710178115

Bebbington J, 2001, Full Cost Accounting: an Agenda for Action

10.1108/09513579910259906

10.1108/09513570010316135

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199809)7:4<179::AID-BSE162>3.0.CO;2-E

10.2469/faj.v22.n3.51

British Telecommunications (BT), 2003, Just Values – Beyond the Business Case for Sustainable Development

10.1006/bare.1999.0118

10.1111/1467-6281.00004

Business in the Community (BITC), 2003, The Business Case for Corporate Responsibility

10.1108/09534810010330869

Chen RS., 1975, Social and financial stewardship, The Accounting Review, 50, 533

Commission of the European Communities (EC), 2002, Corporate Social Responsibility: a Business Contribution to Sustainable Development

Co‐operative Insurance Society (CIS), 2002, Sustainability Pays

CorpWatch.2001.Greenwash Fact Sheet.http://www.corpwatch.org[27 January 2004].

Crenshaw KW., 1994, Toward a race‐conscious pedagogy in legal education, Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 4, 33

10.1108/09513570210435852

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (now Deloitte), 2002, Sustainability Reporting and Assurance – Trends, Challenges and Perspectives

10.1080/0969160X.2000.9651638

10.1108/09513570210418923

10.1080/0969160X.2003.9651696

The Economist. (2002). The dangers of corporate social responsibility. 21 November: 74.

European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), European Trade Union Technical Bureau (TUTB), 2002, European Trade Unions – Actors for Sustainable Development

Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens (FEE), 2003, Benefits of Sustainability Assurance

10.1111/1467-6486.00280

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 2002, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines

10.1006/cpac.1997.0169

10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00003-9

10.4135/9781446220849

10.1108/09513579710178106

Gray R, 1996, Accounting and Accountability – Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199809)7:4<213::AID-BSE158>3.0.CO;2-I

10.1016/0361-3682(87)90002-X

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199909/10)8:5<267::AID-BSE215>3.0.CO;2-E

Hedstrom G, 1998, Sustainable development: the next generation of business opportunity, Prism, 4, 5

Henderson D., 2001, Misguided Virtue

10.1006/cpac.1996.0010

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199907/08)8:4<203::AID-BSE204>3.0.CO;2-I

Ijiri Y., 1975, Theory of Accounting Measurement

Kelly M., 2001, The Divine Right of Capital

Langevoort DC., 2001, Seeking sunlight in Santa Fe's shadow: the SEC's pursuit of managerial accountability, Washington University Law Quarterly, 79, 449

10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00044-0

10.1111/1467-6303.00087

Litvin D., 2003, Stealing the NGOs' thunder, Ethical Corporation Magazine, 22, 31

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199705)6:2<83::AID-BSE96>3.0.CO;2-U

10.1016/0361-3682(76)90041-6

Medawar C., 1978, What is accountability?, Accountant's Magazine, 82, 472

MHC International.2004.Alternative View of Corporate Social Responsibility: a Dialogue with the Financial Times.http://www.mhcinternational.com[7 January 2004].

Michalos AC., 1995, A Pragmatic Approach to Business Ethics

Millon D., 1993, Communitarians, contractarians, and the crisis in corporate law, Washington and Lee Law Review, 50, 1373

10.1016/0361-3682(88)90018-9

10.1111/1467-9299.00218

10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00008-1

10.1007/BF00382940

10.1108/09513570210435898

O'DwyerB.2002b.Constructing a social account in an overseas aid agency: a failed attempt at a dialogic education process. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference New York 2002.

10.1108/09513570310492290

O'DwyerB UnermanJ BradleyJ.2003.Stakeholder perceptions of corporate social disclosure in Ireland: a story of antagonism powerlessness and poor practice. Paper presented at the 26th annual congress of the European Accounting Association Seville 2003.

10.1177/0170840603024003910

10.1002/bse.364

10.1080/096381800407950

10.1111/1467-6303.00066

10.1002/bse.338

Puxty AG., 1986, Social accounting as immanent legitimation: a critique of a technicist ideology, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 95

Puxty AG., 1991, Social accountability and universal pragmatics, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 4, 35

10.1016/0361-3682(91)90027-C

10.1016/0361-3682(88)90013-X

10.1108/09513579510094723

10.1002/bse.353

Sternberg E., 1999, The Stakeholder Concept: a Mistaken Doctrine

10.1111/1467-8608.00208

ThomsonI BebbingtonJ.In press.Social and environmental reporting in the UK: a pedagogic evaluation.Critical Perspectives on Accounting.

10.2308/api.2002.2.1.97

10.1108/09513570310505952

10.1108/09513579110000504

Trotter C., 2000, When lambs lie down with lions, some will be eaten, The Independent (NZ), 19

Von Tunzelmann A, 1996, Social Responsibility and the Company: a New Perspective on Governance, Strategy and the Community

10.1111/1467-9515.00270

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199802)7:1<1::AID-BSE132>3.0.CO;2-7

Wells CAH., 2002, The cycles of corporate social responsibility: an historical retrospective for the twenty‐first century, Kansas Law Review, 51, 77

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), 1997, Environmental Performance and Shareholder Value

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), 2003, Sustainable Development Reporting: Striking the Balance

10.1080/019722401753330832