Application of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model in selecting pandemic hospital site

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 9 - Trang 1-22 - 2023
Alaa Alden Al Mohamed1, Sobhi Al Mohamed2, Moustafa Zino1
1Department of Business Administration, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria
2Department of Business Administration, Ebla Private University, Aleppo, Syria

Tóm tắt

One of the most important challenges for decision-makers and investors is location selection, which may be assessed using multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies. Problems with picking a location include deciding between alternative locations, analyzing alternatives, and identifying the best location for a hospital. Because they analyze options with multiple perspectives in terms of numerous competing criteria, MCDM approaches are useful instruments for solving decision-making challenges. The fuzzy set theory (FST), which represents uncertainty in human beliefs, may be effectively used with MCDM approaches to produce more sensitive, tangible, and accurate findings in this context. A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model (FMCDM) is proposed to find the optimal location based on a combination of factors. In the first stage, the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is used to estimate the relative criteria classification through the evaluation process. In the second stage, the fuzzy technique of order preference using similarities to the perfect solution (FTOPSIS) is applied to rank the possible alternative sites. The findings from this study indicate that integrate FAHP and FTOPSIS is the most often used FMCDM approach in Aleppo for selecting the best location for a new hospital.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdi Z, Lega F, Ebeid N, Ravaghi H (2022) Role of hospital leadership in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Serv Manage Res 35:2–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848211035620 Alhaffar MHDBA, Janos S (2021) Public health consequences after ten years of the Syrian crisis: a literature review. Glob Health 17:111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00762-9 AlMoallem Z, Miftah M (2019) Persons with disability in Syria: challenges and solutions | KALU Institute (Disability in Syria). KALU Institute, Syria Alvarez PA, Ishizaka A, Martínez L (2021) Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: A survey. Expert Syst Appl 183:115368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.1153684 Amiri MP (2010) Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:6218–6224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103 Ashrafzadeh M, Rafiei FM, Isfahani NM, Zare Z (2012) Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of warehouse location: a case study 3:18 Barron FH, Barrett BE (1996) Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Manage Sci 42:1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1515 Benítez JM, Martín JC, Román C (2007) Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry. Tour Manage 28:544–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.018 Bozdağ CE, Kahraman C, Ruan D (2003) Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Comput Ind 51:13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00029-0 Büyüközkan G, Ruan D (2008) Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Math Comput Simul Intell Sens Eval Concepts Implement Appl 77:464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2007.11.015 Byun HS, Lee KH (2005) A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:1338–1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2099-2 Calabrese A, Costa R, Levialdi N, Menichini T (2019) Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 139:155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005 Çalık A (2021) A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era. Soft Comput 25:2253–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05294-9 Chai J, Liu JNK, Ngai EWT (2013) Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Syst Appl 40:3872–3885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040 Chen C-T (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 Chen C-T, Lin C-T, Huang S-F (2006) A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 102:289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009 Chen L, Pan W (2021) Review fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making in construction management using a network approach. Appl Soft Comput 102:107103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107103 Chen S-J, Hwang C-L (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods, In: Chen S-J, Hwang C-L (eds.), Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 289–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5 Choo EU, Schoner B, Wedley WC (1999) Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision making. Comput Ind Eng 37:527–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(00)00019-X Chou T-Y, Hsu C-L, Chen M-C (2008) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection. Int J Hosp Manag 27:293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.029 Chu T-C (2002) Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:859–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700200227 Cinelli M, Coles SR, Kirwan K (2014) Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecol Ind 46:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011 Coello C, Jin Y, n.d. (2007) IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in multicriteria decision making Hilton Hawaiian Village Beach Resort & Spa. Dağdeviren M, Yavuz S, Kılınç N (2009) Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 36:8143–8151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016 Dang VT, Wang J, Dang WV-T (2019) An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach to assess sustainable urban development in an emerging economy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162902 De Keyser A, Verleye K, Lemon K, Keiningham T, Klaus P (2020) Moving the customer experience field forward: introducing the touchpoints, context, qualities (TCQ) nomenclature. J Serv Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520928390 Dell’Ovo M, Capolongo S, Oppio A (2018) Combining spatial analysis with MCDA for the siting of healthcare facilities. Land Use Policy 76:634–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.044 Deng H, Yeh C-H, Willis RJ (2000) Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput Oper Res 27:963–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6 Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Comput Oper Res 22:763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H Dikmen CF, Say T (2008) A MCDM approach for middlemen evaluation and selection in marketing. Serbian J Manag 3:5–15 Doğan A, Söylemez İs, Özcan U (2016) Green supplier selection by using fuzzy topsis method, In: Uncertainty modelling in knowledge engineering and decision making. Presented at the conference on uncertainty modelling in knowledge engineering and decision making (FLINS 2016), World Scientific, Roubaix, France, pp. 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813146976_0101 Dožić S (2019) Multi-criteria decision making methods: application in the aviation industry. J Air Transp Manag 79:101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101683 Dutta P, Borah G (2021) Robot selection problem via fuzzy TOPSIS method using novel distance and similarity measure for generalized fuzzy numbers with unequal heights. New Math Nat Comput. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793005722500338 Ebrahimnejad S, Mousavi SM, Seyrafianpour H (2010) Risk identification and assessment for build–operate–transfer projects: A fuzzy multi attribute decision making model. Expert Syst Appl 37:575–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.037 Edwards W (1977) How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 7:326–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720 Emami M, Nazari K, Fardmanesh H (2012) Application of fuzzy TOPSIS technique for strategic management decision 6. Erdin C, Akbaş HE (2019) A comparative analysis of fuzzy TOPSIS and geographic information systems (GIS) for the location selection of shopping malls: a case study from Turkey. Sustainability 11:3837. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143837 Ertuğrul İ, Karakaşoğlu N (2008) Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:783–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8 Feng C-M, Wang R-T (2001) Considering the financial ratios on the performance evaluation of highway bus industry. Transp Rev 21:449–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640010020304 Gershon M, Duckstein L (1983) Multiobjective approaches to river basin planning. J Water Resour Plan Manag 109:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1983)109:1(13) Greco S, Figueira J, Ehrgott M (2016) Multiple criteria decision analysis. Springer, New York Gu X, Zhu Q (2006) Fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method based on eigenvector of fuzzy attribute evaluation space. Decis Support Syst 41:400–410 Hobbs BF, Horn GT (1997) Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas. Energy Policy, Model-based policy analysis 25:357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00025-6 Hsieh T-Y, Lu S-T, Tzeng G-H (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Project Manage 22:573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002 Janic M (2003) Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and air passenger transport in Europe. Transp Plan Technol 26:491–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308106032000167373 Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek M, Antosz K, Wyczółkowski R, Mazurkiewicz D, Sun B, Qian C, Ren Y (2021) Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluation of the maintenance factors affecting sustainable manufacturing. Energies 14:1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051436 Joshi R, Banwet DK, Shankar R (2011) A Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS based benchmarking framework for performance improvement of a cold chain. Expert Syst Appl 38:10170–10182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.072 Kahraman C, Beskese A, Ruan D (2004) Measuring flexibility of computer integrated manufacturing systems using fuzzy cash flow analysis. Inf Sci 168:77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2003.11.004 Kahraman C, Onar SC, Oztaysi B (2015) Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. IJCIS 8:637. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325 Karande P, Chakraborty S (2012) Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater Des 37:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.013 Kasim MM (2014) Determination of criteria weights in solving multi-criteria problems. AIP Conf Proc 1635:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4903555 Kasim MM, n.d. Aggregation of criteria weights for multi-person decision making with equal or different credibility 7. Kavosi M, Mavi RK (2011) Fuzzy quality function deployment approach using TOPSIS and analytic hierarchy process methods. Int J Prod Quality Manag 7:304–324 Kaya İ, Çolak M, Terzi F (2019) A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making. Energ Strat Rev 24:207–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.03.003 Kelemenis A, Askounis D (2010) A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection. Expert Syst Appl 37:4999–5008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.013 Kiliç M, Kaya İ (2015) Investment project evaluation by a decision making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 27:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.028 Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2008.02.376 Konstantinos I, Georgios T, Garyfalos A (2019) A Decision Support System methodology for selecting wind farm installation locations using AHP and TOPSIS: case study in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region, Greece. Energy Policy 132:232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.020 Krishnan AR, Aqilah SN, Kasim MM, Nazri EM, Char AK (2017) A revised procedure to identify λ0-measure values for applying Choquet integral in solving multi-attribute decision problems. Opsearch 54:637–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-017-0297-6 Kumar A, Wasan P, Luthra S, Dixit G (2020) Development of a framework for selecting a sustainable location of waste electrical and electronic equipment recycling plant in emerging economies. J Cleaner Prod 277:122645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122645 Kumar S, Kumar S, Barman AG (2018) Supplier selection using fuzzy TOPSIS multi criteria model for a small scale steel manufacturing unit. Proc Comput Sci Int Conf Robot Smart Manuf 133:905–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.097 Li Y, Zobel CW (2020) Exploring supply chain network resilience in the presence of the ripple effect. Int J Prod Econ 228:107693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107693 Liang G-S (1999) Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts. Eur J Oper Res 112:682–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00410-4 Liao C-N, Lin C-H, Fu Y-K (2015) Integrative model for the selection of a new product launch strategy, based on ANP, TOPSIS and MCGP: a case study. Technol Econ Develop Econ 22:715–737. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1074951 Lin H-T, Chang W-L (2008) Order selection and pricing methods using flexible quantity and fuzzy approach for buyer evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 187:415–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.003 Ma J, Fan Z-P, Huang L-H (1999) A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur J Oper Res 112:397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00141-6 Mardani A, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D, Jusoh A, Nor KMD, Khoshnoudi M (2016) Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy saving technologies and solutions in five star hotels: a new hierarchical framework. Energy 117:131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.076 Mat Desa NH, Jemain AA, Mat Kasim M (2015) Construction of a composite hospital admission index using the aggregated weights of criteria. JSM 44:239–247. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2015-4402-11 Milani AS, Shanian A, Madoliat R, Nemes JA (2005) The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection. Struct Multidisc Optim 29:312–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1 Mousavi-Nasab SH, Sotoudeh-Anvari A (2017) A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems. Mater Des 121:237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.041 Nadkarni RR, Puthuvayi B (2020) A comprehensive literature review of multi-criteria decision making methods in heritage buildings. J Build Eng 32:101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814 Önüt S, Soner S (2008) Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Manage 28:1552–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019 Özbek A (2015) Supplier selection with fuzzy TOPSIS 14 Ozernoy VM (1992) Choosing the “Best” multiple criterlv decision-making method. INFOR: Inf Syst Oper Res 30:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1992.11732192 Patil SK, Kant R (2014) A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of knowledge management adoption in supply chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Syst Appl 41:679–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.093 Petrovic I, Kankaras M (2020) A hybridized IT2FS-DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS multicriteria decision making approach: Case study of selection and evaluation of criteria for determination of air traffic control radar position. Decis Making Appl Manag Eng 3:146–164. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003134p Rezaei J, Fahim PBM, Tavasszy L (2014) Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 41:8165–8179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.005 Roberts R, Goodwin P (2002) Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 11:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.320 Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Springer, Berlin Roy B, Słowiński R (2013) Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO J Decis Process 1:69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0004-7 Roy T, Dutta RK (2019) Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for multi-objective optimization of electro discharge machining process. Soft Comput 23:5053–5063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3173-2 Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European J Oper Res Desic Making Anal Hierar Process Theory Appl 48:9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 Sadi-Nezhad S, Khalili Damghani K (2010) Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance. Appl Soft Comput Optim Methods Appl Decis-Making Process 10:1028–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.036 Senvar O, Otay I, Bolturk E (2016) Hospital site selection via hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, 8th IFAC conference on manufacturing modelling, management and control MIM 2016 49, 1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.656 Singh RK, Gunasekaran A, Kumar P (2018) Third party logistics (3PL) selection for cold chain management: a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Ann Oper Res 267:531–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2591-3 Sitorus F, Cilliers JJ, Brito-Parada PR (2019) Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: applications and trends. Expert Syst Appl 121:393–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.001 Sotoudeh-Anvari A, Sadjadi SJ, Hadji Molana SM, Sadi-Nezhad S (2019) A stochastic multi-objective model based on the classical optimal search model for searching for the people who are lost in response stage of earthquake. Scientia Iranica 26:1842–1864. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2018.20226 Sugeno M (1985) An introductory survey of fuzzy control. Inf Sci 36:59–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(85)90026-X Sun C-C (2010) A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:7745–7754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066 Sun C-C, Lin GTR (2009) Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites. Expert Syst Appl 36:11764–11771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.017 Torlak G, Sevkli M, Sanal M, Zaim S (2011) Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry. Expert Syst Appl 38:3396–3406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.125 van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7 Wang C-N, Dang T-T, Nguyen N-A-T (2021) Outsourcing reverse logistics for E-commerce retailers: a two-stage fuzzy optimization approach. Axioms 10:34. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10010034 Wang T-C, Chang T-H (2007) Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 33:870–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003 Wang Y-J (2008) Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 34:1837–1845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.029 Wang Y-M, Elhag TMS (2006) Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl 31:309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040 Wątróbski J, Jankowski J, Ziemba P, Karczmarczyk A, Zioło M (2019) Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection: Rule set database and exemplary decision support system implementation blueprints. Data Brief 22:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.015 Wen Z, Liao H, Zavadskas EK (2020) MACONT: mixed aggregation by comprehensive normalization technique for multi-criteria analysis. Informatica 31:857–880. https://doi.org/10.15388/20-INFOR417 Wu CK, Wang C-N, Le TKT (2022) Fuzzy multi criteria decision making model for agritourism location selection: a case study in Vietnam. Axioms 11:176. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11040176 Yang T, Hung C-C (2007) Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 23:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2005.12.002 Yang ZL, Bonsall S, Wang J (2011) Approximate TOPSIS for vessel selection under uncertain environment. Expert Syst Appl 38:14523–14534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.032 Yeh C-H (2002) A problem-based selection of multi-attribute decision-making methods. Int Trans Oper Res 9:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-3995.00348 Yong D (2006) Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:839–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2436-5 Yucesan M, Gul M (2020) Hospital service quality evaluation: an integrated model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Soft Comput 24:3237–3255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04084-2 Zanakis SH, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. Eur J Oper Res 107:507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1 Zavadskas EK, Podvezko V (2016) Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. Int J Info Tech Dec Mak 15:267–283. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016500036 Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z (2011) Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technol Econ Dev Econ 17:397–427. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291 Zeleny M (2012) Multiple criteria decision making Kyoto 1975. Springer, Berlin Zhu H, Wei L, Niu P (2020) The novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. China Global Health Res Policy 5:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00135-6