Application of a new qeneration of geophonesto improve seismic acquisitionin onshore-offshore transition areas
Tóm tắt
In this paper, we review the differences between velocity geophones (VG) and acceleration geophones (AG) and their effect on seismic signals acquired in onshore-offshore transition areas. We present a new generation of Land Piezoelectric Geophone (LPG) and analyze its performance. Our field experiments demonstrate that our new LPG can be used to substitute for VGs in order to eliminate phase, frequency and energy differences between different geophone systems commonly used in transition areas.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aldridge, D. F., 1989, Statistically perturbed geophone array responses: Geophysics, 54, 1306–1317.
Bird, J., 2003, The marine vibrator: The Leading Edge, 22, 368–372.
Chen, S. J. and Dalton, C, 1983, Theoretical and experimental approaches to the geophone spurious frequency: Geophys. Prosp., 31, 574–590.
Deng, Z. W., 2004, 3D seismic acquisition in a complex mountainous area: J. Geophys. Eng. 1, 17–27.
Hagedoorn, A. L., Kruithof, E. J., and Maxwell, P. W., 1988, A practical set of guidelines for geophone element testing and evaluation: First Break, 6, 325–331.
Hoover, G. M., and O’Brien, J. T, 1980, The influence of the planted geophone on seismic land data: Geophysics, 45, 1239–1253.
Klaassen, K. B., and Van Peppen, J. C. L., 1983, Electronic acceleration sensitive geophone for seismic prospecting: Geophys. Prosp., 31, 457–480.
Li, Z. P., 2004, Key problems of seismic acquisition in a mountainous area in south China: J. Geophys. Eng., 1, 160–167.
MacArthur, A., 1985, Geophone frequency calibration and laser verification: Geophysics, 50, 49–55.
Stanley, P. J., 1986, The geophone and front-end fidelity: First Break, 4, 11–14.
White, J.E., 1964, Motion product seismograms: Geophysics, 29, 288–298.