Antimicrobial susceptibility of major pathogens of orofacial odontogenic infections to 11 β‐lactam antibiotics

Wiley - Tập 17 Số 5 - Trang 285-289 - 2002
Tomoari Kuriyama1,2, Tadahiro Karasawa3, Kiyomasa Nakagawa2, Shinichi Nakamura3, Erika Yamamoto2
1Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
2Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and
3Bacteriology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan,

Tóm tắt

In this study, we evaluated the current effectiveness of 11 β‐lactam antibiotics for treatment of orofacial odontogenic infections by determining the antimicrobial susceptibility of the major pathogens. The antimicrobial susceptibilities of viridans streptococci (n = 47), Peptostreptococcus (n = 67), Porphyromonas (n = 18), Fusobacterium (n = 57), black‐pigmented Prevotella (n = 59) and non‐pigmented Prevotella (n = 47) isolated from pus specimens of 93 orofacial odontogenic infections to penicillin G, cefmetazole, flomoxef, cefoperazone, cefoperazone/sulbactam, ceftazidime, cefpirome, cefepime, cefoselis, imipenem and faropenem were determined using the agar dilution method. Penicillin G, most cephalosporins, imipenem and faropenem worked well against viridans streptococci, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas and Fusobacterium. Penicillin G and most cephalosporins, including fourth‐generation agents, were not effective against β‐lactamase‐positive Prevotella, though they were effective against β‐lactamase‐negative strains. Cefmetazole, cefoperazone/sulbactam, imipenem and faropenem expressed powerful antimicrobial activity against β‐lactamase‐positive Prevotella. In conclusion, penicillins have the potential to be first‐line agents in the treatment of orofacial odontogenic infections. Most of the other β‐lactam antibiotics, including fourth‐generation cephalosporins, were not found to have greater effectiveness than penicillins. In contrast, cefmetazole, cefoperazone/sulbactam, imipenem and faropenem were found to have greater effectiveness than penicillins.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Finegold SM, 1989, Anaerobic infections in humans., 793, 10.1016/B978-0-12-256745-2.50043-X

10.1016/0030-4220(90)90109-6

10.1067/moe.2000.109639

10.1034/j.1399-302x.2001.160102.x

KuriyamaT KarasawaT NakagawaK YamamotoE NakamuraS.Bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram‐positive cocci isolated from pus specimens of orofacial odontogenic infections.Oral Microbiol Immunol2002:17:132–135.

Laskin DM, 1985, Oral and maxillofacial surgery., 219

Mandell GL, 1996, Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 1073

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards., 1997, Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. 4th edition. Approved standard. NCCLS document M11‐A4.

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards., 1998, Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. 4th edition. Approved standard. NCCLS document M7‐A4.

Peterson LJ, 1998, Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery., 392

10.1007/BF01964256

Sandor GK, 1998, Antimicrobial treatment options in the management of odontogenic infections, J Can Dent Assoc, 64, 508

10.1128/AAC.38.11.2599

10.1093/clinids/7.Supplement_3.S417

10.1128/AAC.35.6.1219