Anti-foreign bias in the court: Welfare explanation and evidence from Canadian intellectual property litigations.

Journal of International Economics - Tập 117 - Trang 21-36 - 2019
Joseph Mai1, Andrey Stoyanov2
1Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Department of International Economics and Trade, College of Business, 100 Wudong Road, Shanghai, China
2York University, Department of Economics, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies, 1084 Vari Hall, 4700 Keele St., M3J 1P3 Toronto, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ang, 2014, Does enforcement of intellectual property rights matter in china? evidence from financing and investment choices in the high-tech industry, Rev. Econ. Stat., 96, 332, 10.1162/REST_a_00372 Branco, 1994, Favoring domestic firms in procurement contracts, J. Int. Econ., 37, 65, 10.1016/0022-1996(94)90025-6 Branstetter, 2006, Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U. S. firm-level panel data, Q. J. Econ., 121, 321 Branstetter, 2011, Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development?, J. Int. Econ., 83, 27, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.09.001 Chin, 1991, Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade Cockburn, 2016, Patents and the Global Diffusion of New Drugs, Am. Econ. Rev., 106, 136, 10.1257/aer.20141482 Deardorff, 1992, Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection, Economica, 59, 35, 10.2307/2555064 Deere, 2008, The TRIPS implementation game: a fight for ideas, 1 Diwan, 1991, Patents, appropriate technology, and north-south trade, J. Int. Econ., 30, 27, 10.1016/0022-1996(91)90003-O France, 1998, Takeover specialists: why many litigators Hand their cases to high court pros, American Bar Association Journal, 84, 38 Gawande, 2000, Is Protection for Sale? Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection, Rev. Econ. Stat., 82, 139, 10.1162/003465300558579 Geng, 2015 Ginarte, 1997, Determinants of patent rights: a cross-national study, Res. Policy, 26, 283, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00022-X Goldberg, 1999, Protection for Sale: an Empirical Investigation, Am. Econ. Rev., 89, 1135, 10.1257/aer.89.5.1135 Grossman, 2004, International Protection of Intellectual Property, Am. Econ. Rev., 94, 1635, 10.1257/0002828043052312 Haire, 1999, Attorney Expertise, Litigant Success, and Judicial Decisionmaking in the U.S. courts of Appeals, Law Soc. Rev., 33, 667, 10.2307/3115107 Head, 2013, Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook, 4, 131, 10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3 Heckman, 1979, Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 153, 10.2307/1912352 Helpman, 1993, Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights, Econometrica, 61, 1247, 10.2307/2951642 Hunt, 2006, When do more Patents Reduce R&D?, Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 87, 10.1257/000282806777212035 Ivus, 2010, Do stronger patent rights raise high-tech exports to the developing world?, J. Int. Econ., 81, 38, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.12.002 Javorcik, 2004, The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: evidence from transition economies, Eur. Econ. Rev., 48, 39, 10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00257-X Lai, 2008, International Protection of Intellectual Property: An Empirical Investigation Lanjouw, 2004, Protecting Intellectual Propert Rights: are Small Firms Handicapped?, J. Law Econ., 47, 45, 10.1086/380476 Lerner, 2002, 150 years of Patent Protection, Am. Econ. Rev., 92, 221, 10.1257/000282802320189294 Liegsalz, 2013, Patent Examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China, Res. Policy, 42, 552, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.003 Maskus, 2000 Maskus, 1995, How Trade-related are Intellectual Property Rights?, J. Int. Econ., 39, 227, 10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8 Mátyás, 2008, The econometrics of panel data: fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice, vol. 46, 10.1007/978-3-540-75892-1 McAfee, 1989, Government Procurement and International Trade, J. Int. Econ., 26, 291, 10.1016/0022-1996(89)90005-6 McCalman, 2001, Reaping what you Sow: an Empirical Analysis of International Patent Harmonization, J. Int. Econ., 55, 161, 10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00091-5 McCalman, 2005, International diffusion and intellectual property rights: an empirical analysis, J. Int. Econ., 67, 353, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.12.003 McGuire, 1995, Repeat players in the Supreme Court: the Role of experienced lawyers in Litigation Success, J. Polit., 57, 187, 10.2307/2960277 McGuire, 1998, Explaining Executive Success in the U. S. Supreme Court, Polit. Res. Q., 51, 505 Small, 1969, Formal Alliances, 1816-1965: an Extension of the Basic Data, J. Peace Res., 6, 257, 10.1177/002234336900600305 Szmer, 2007, Does the Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada, Law Soc. Rev., 41, 279, 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00299.x Voeten, 2013, Data and analyses of voting in the united nations general assembly, 54 Webster, 2014, Patent Examination Outcomes and the National Treatment Principle, RAND J. Econ., 45, 449, 10.1111/1756-2171.12053 Yang, 2008, Trade-related Influences, Foreign Intellectual Property Rights and Outbound International Patenting, Res. Policy, 37, 446, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.008