Anniversary Paper: Evolution of ultrasound physics and the role of medical physicists and the AAPM and its journal in that evolution
Tóm tắt
Ultrasound has been the greatest imaging modality worldwide for many years by equipment purchase value and by number of machines and examinations. It is becoming increasingly the front end imaging modality; serving often as an extension of the physician's fingers. We believe that at the other extreme, high‐end systems will continue to compete with all other imaging modalities in imaging departments to be the method of choice for various applications, particularly where safety and cost are paramount. Therapeutic ultrasound, in addition to the physiotherapy practiced for many decades, is just coming into its own as a major tool in the long progression to less invasive interventional treatment. The physics of medical ultrasound has evolved over many fronts throughout its history. For this reason, a topical review, rather than a primarily chronological one is presented. A brief review of medical ultrasound imaging and therapy is presented, with an emphasis on the contributions of medical physicists, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and its publications, particularly its journal
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
1995, Medical CT and Ultrasound: Current Technology and Applications
1974, Physics of Nonionizing Radiation
P. L.CarsonandJ. A.Zagzebski “Pulse echo ultrasound imaging systems: Performance tests and criteria ” AAPM Report #8 (1981) p.73.
Curry T. S., 1992, Christensen's Physics of Diagnostic Radiology
Hedrick W. R., 2004, Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation
Evans D. H., 2000, Doppler Ultrasound: Physics, Instrumentation
Angelsen B. A. J., 2000, Ultrasound Imaging: Waves, Signals, and Signal Processing
Szabo T. L., 2004, Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out, 549
Smith H. J., 1991, Basic Doppler Physics
Griffiths K. A., 2004, An historical look at ultrasound as an Australian innovation on the occasion of the ultrasound stamp issued by Australia Post—18 May 2004, ASUM Ultrasound Bulletin, 2004, 22
D.Robinson “Invent your own radiation ” Presentation to sonographers in Australia 1980's.
Shung K. K., 1992, Ultrasonic Scattering in Biological Tissues
Greenleaf J. F., 1986, Tissue Characterization with Ultrasound
Whittingham T. A., 1999, Transducers and beam forming in medical ultrasonic imaging, Insight, 41, 8
McLaughlin G., 2007, Broad‐beam imaging methods, Zonare Medical Systems, Inc.
McLaughlin G., 2004, Broad‐beam imaging, Zonare Medical Systems, Inc.
Mo L. Y. L., 2007, IEEE International Ultrasonic Symposium Preceedings
Fisher R., 2005, Reconfigurable arrays for portable ultrasound, Proc.‐IEEE Ultrason. Symp., 1, 495
Hazard C. R., 2003, Annular array beamforming for 2D arrays with reduced system channels, Proc.‐IEEE Ultrason. Symp., 2, 1859
Daft C., 2005, CMUTs and electronics for 2D and 3D imaging: Monolithic integration, in‐handle chip sets and system implications, Proc.‐IEEE Ultrason. Symp., 1, 463
Fisher R., 2005, Reconfigurable arrays for portable ultrasound, Proc.‐IEEE Ultrason. Symp., 1, 495
Duck F., 1990, Physical Properties of Tissues, 346
J. H.Holmes(Private communication 1975).
Jones J. P., 1975, Current Problems in Ultrasonic Impediography, Natl. Bur. Stand. Spec. Publ., 453, 253
Kremkau F. W., 2006, Diagnostic Ultrasound: Principles and Instruments, 544
Averkiou M. A., 1997, A new imaging technique based on the nonlinear properties of tissues, Proc.‐IEEE Ultrason. Symp., 1, 1561
Lantheus Medical Imaging Updates Definity® Label To Modify Benefit/Risk Assessment Of The Product: FDA Approves Class Labeling Changes For Echo Contrast Agents2008[cited May 13]; Available from:http://www.lantheus.com/News.html
Schmitt R. M., 1989, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Proceedings, 429
N.de Jong “Acoustic properties of ultrasound contrast agents ” Ph.D. thesis Erasmus University (Rotterdam 1993).
Burns P. N., 1996, Harmonic imaging: Princples and preliminary results, Angiology, 47, S63
Giger M. L., 1999, Computerized analysis of lesions in US images of the breast, Radiology, 6, 665
Dines K. A., 1995, 43
Sinha S. P., 2007, 1335
Koch R., 1982, Ultrasonic transmission tomography and pulse‐echo imaging of the breast, Ultrason. Imaging, 4, 188
Callahan K. S., 2007, Transmission breast ultrasound imaging: Representative case studies of speed of sound and attenuation of sound computed tomographic images, Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 30, 458
Kelly‐Fry E., 1991, Adaptation development and expansion of x‐ray mammography techniques for ultrasound mammography, J. Ultrasound Med., 10, S
R.Schmidtet al. Preliminary experience with WhoBUS an automated whole breast ultrasound scanner: Comparison with conventional hand‐held ultrasound in Annual Meeting Radiol. Soc. North America (Chicago 2006).
Goertz D. E., 2002, High‐frequency Doppler ultrasound monitors the effects of antivascular therapy on tumor blood flow, Cancer Res., 62, 6371
Behm C. Z., 2006, Cellular and molecular imaging with targeted contrast ultrasound, Ultrasound Q., 22, 67
Rychak J. J., 2007, Microultrasound molecular imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in a mouse model of tumor angiogenesis, Mol. Imaging, 6, 289, 10.2310/7290.2007.00024
Erikson K. R., 1975, The AIUM standard test object and recommended procedures for its use, Reflections, 1, 74
IEC 60854 Methods of measuring the performance of ultrasonic pulse echo diagnostic equipment.1986 Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
Fowlkes J. B., 2008, AIUM consensus report on potential bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound, J. Ultrasound Med., 27, 515
AIUM/NEMA Standard for Real‐Time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. Revision 2. AIUM/NEMA Standards Publication (NEMA UD3): Amer. Inst. Ultras. Med. Laurel MD and Nat. Elect. Manuf. Assoc. Rosslyn VA 2004.
NCRP‐Comm‐66 NCRP Report No. 140. Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Bethesda 2002.
1990, IEEE Guide for Medical Ultrasound Field Parameter Measurements
Ziskin C., 1993, Ultrasonic Exposimetry
FDA 510(k) Guide for measuring and reporting output of diagnostic ultrasound medical devices Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. FDA Rockville MD (1995).
IEC 1157 Requirements for the declaration of the acoustic output of medical diagnostic ultrasound equipment (International Electrotechnical Commission Geneva 1992).
IEC IEC 60601‐2‐37—Particular requirements for the safety of ultrasonic medical diagnostic and monitoring equipment ed. 2 (I.E. Commission Geneva 2007).
Grenier N., 2007, Therapies by focused ultrasound, Therapies par Ultrasons Focalises, 88, 1787
H.Wang “Adaptive ultrasound phased array systems for deep hyperthermia ” Ph.D. thesis University of Michigan 1994.
NCRP Exposure criteria for medical ultrasound. Part 1: Exposure based on thermal mechanisms. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report 113 (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Bethesda MD1992).
Burov A. K., 1956, High‐intensity ultrasonic vibrations for action on animal and human malignant tumours, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 106, 239
Zura R. D., 2007, A survey of orthopaedic traumatologists concerning the use of bone growth stimulators, J. Surg. Orthop. Advances, 16, 1
Brewer D. J., 2000, Treatment of metastatic cancer with tetrathiomolybdate, an anti‐copper, antiangiogenic agent. I. Phase I. study, Clin. Cancer Res., 6, 1
Holm H. H., 1981, Ultrasonically guided precise needle placement in the prostate and the seminal vesicles, J. Urol., 125, 385, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55044-2
Bassan H., 2007, 617
Shao F., 2006, Efficient 3D prostate surface detection for ultrasound guided robotic biopsy, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys., 3, 439