And Yet It Moves: The Observability of the Rotation of the Earth

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 15 - Trang 213-225 - 2010
Peter Kosso1
1Department of Philosophy, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA

Tóm tắt

A central point of controversy in the time of the Copernican Revolution was the motion, or not, of the earth. We now take it for granted that Copernicus and Galileo were right; the earth really does move. But to what extent is this conclusion based on observation? This paper explores the meaning and observability of the rotation of the earth and shows that the phenomenon was not observable at the time of Galileo, and it is not observable now.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barbour J. (2001) The discovery of dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York Galileo, G. (1953, originally published in 1632). Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems, translated by Stillman Drake. Berkeley: University of California Press. Lloyd G. E. R. (1970) Early greek science: Thales to Aristotle. W.W. Norton, New York Reichenbach, H. (1958). The philosophy of space and time. New York: Dover. Translated by Maria Reichenbach and John Freund. Rosenberg B., VanCamp L., Krigas T. (1965) Inhibation of cell division in Escherichia coli by electrolysis products from a platinum electrode. Nature 205: 698–699 Stahl W. (1970) Aristarchus of Samos. In: Gillispie C. (eds) Dictionary of scientific biography (1st ed.). Scribner, New York, pp 246–250 Toomer G. J. (1970) Heraclides Ponticus. In: Gillispie C. (eds) Dictionary of scientific biography (25th ed.). Scribner, New York, pp 202–205