Analyzing the transition from single- to double-track railway lines with nonlinear regression analysis

Samuel L. Sogin1, Yung-Cheng Lai2, C. Tyler Dick1, Christopher PL Barkan2
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
2Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

The demand for freight rail transportation in North America is anticipated to substantially increase in the foreseeable future. Additionally, government agencies seek to increase the speed and frequency of passenger trains operating on certain freight lines, further adding to demand for new railway capacity. The majority of the North American mainline railway network is single track with passing sidings for meets and passes. Expanding the infrastructure by constructing additional track is necessary to maintain network fluidity under increased rail traffic. The additional track can be constructed in phases over time, resulting in hybrid track configurations during the transition from purely single track to a double-track route. To plan this phased approach, there is a need to understand the incremental capacity benefit as a single-track route transitions to a two-main-track route in the context of shared passenger and freight train operations. Consequently, in this study, the Rail Traffic Controller software is used to simulate various hybrid track configurations. The simulations consider different operating conditions to capture the interaction between traffic volume, traffic composition and speed differences between train types. A nonlinear regression model is then developed to quantify the incremental capacity benefit of double-track construction through exponential delay–volume relationships. Adding sections of double track reduces train delay linearly under constant volume. This linear delay reduction yields a convex increase in capacity as double track is installed. These results allow railway practitioners to make more-informed decisions on the optimal strategy for incremental railway capacity upgrades.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Richards CW, 2006, Trains

10.2495/CR120261

Bing AJ, Beshers EW, Chzvez M and Simpson DP. Guidebook for implementing passenger rail service on shared passenger and freight corridors. Report 657, 2010. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Transport Commission.

10.1016/j.tre.2007.04.001

10.1287/inte.16.1.51

Kahn AM. Railway capacity analysis and related methodology. Report, 1979. Canadian Transport Commission, Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Transport Commission. http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=141733.

10.1016/j.ejor.2004.10.010

10.1109/WSC.1998.745969

10.3141/2117-06

10.1109/WSC.2011.6148061

Sogin SL, Barkan CPL, Lai YC and Saat MR. Impact of passenger trains in double track networks. In: The joint rail conference, Philadephia, PA, 17–19 April 2012. New York, USA: ASME.

Petersen E and Taylor A. Design of single-track rail line for high-speed trains. Transport Res, Part A: General 1987; 21(1): 47–57.

Pawar SPS. An analysis of single track high speed rail operation. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK, 2011.

Prokopy JC and Rubin RB. Parametric analysis of railway line capacity. Report DOT-FR-5014-2, 1975. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.

10.1145/324898.325036

Mitra S, 2010, J Transport Res Forum, 49, 111–126

10.1007/s00521-014-1694-x

Mattsson LG. Railway capacity and train delay relationships. Critical Infrastructure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp.129–150. http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783540680550.

Wilson E, 2012, Rail traffic controller (RTC)

Cambridge Systematics Inc. National rail freight infrastructure capacity and investment study, report, 2007.

Galloway D. Train performance characteristics. Presented at the Transportation Research Board Workshop on Railroad Capacity and Corridor Planning, 2002.

Federal Railroad Administration. Rules, standards, and instructions governing the installation, inspection, maintenance, and repair of signal and train control systems, devices, and appliances, Washington, DC: Federal Railroad Administration, 2000, pp. 487–488.

SAS Institute Inc. Using JMP 10. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, 2012.