Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis

Research Policy - Tập 37 Số 3 - Trang 407-429 - 2008
Anna Bergek1, Staffan Jacobson2, Bo Carlsson3, Sven Lindmark4, Annika Rickne5
1Department of Management and Engineering, Linkoping University, SE-581 83 Linkoping, Sweden.
2Department of Energy and Environment, IMIT and RIDE, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
3Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, 11119 Bellflower Road, Cleveland, OH 44106-7235, USA
4IMIT, RIDE and Department of Innovation Engineering and Management, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
5Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University, Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andersson, 2000, Monitoring and assessing technology choice: the case of solar cells, Energy Policy, 28, 1037, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00090-2

Asheim, 1997, Localisation agglomeration and innovation: towards regional innovation systems in Norway?, European Planning Studies, 5, 299, 10.1080/09654319708720402

Bergek, A., 2002. Shaping and exploiting technological opportunities: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden. PhD thesis. Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.

Bergek, 2003, The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries, 197

Bergek, 2004, Do innovation strategies matter? A comparison of two electro-technical corporations 1988–1998

Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., Rickne, A., 2005. Analyzing the dynamics and functionality of sectoral innovation systems—a manual, report delivered to VINNOVA, 30 March 2005. In: The Proceedings of the DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005. June 25–27, Copenhagen.

Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Hekkert, M., 2007a. Functions in innovation systems: a framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers. In: Foxon, T., Köhler, J., Oughton, C. (Eds.), Innovations for a Low Carbon Economy: Economic, Institutional and Management Approaches. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Hekkert, M., Smith, K., 2007b. Functionality of innovation systems as a rationale for, and guide to innovation policy. In: Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., Shapira, P. (Eds.), Innovation Policy, Theory and Practice. An International Handbook. Elgar Publishers.

Bijker, 1995

Breschi, 1997, Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries

Breschi, 2000, Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation, The Economic Journal, 110, 388, 10.1111/1468-0297.00530

Cantner, 2004, Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 543, 10.1007/s00191-004-0229-5

Carlsson, 2003, The new economy: what is new and what is not?

Carlsson, 1993, Technological systems and economic performance: the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden, 77

Carlsson, 1997, In search of a useful technology policy—general lessons and key issues for policy makers, 299

Carlsson, 1991, On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93, 10.1007/BF01224915

Carlsson, 1995, On the nature. Function and composition of technological systems, 21

Carlsson, 2002, Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues, Research Policy, 21, 233, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X

Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A., 2005. Dynamics of innovation systems—policy-making in a complex and non-deterministic world, under review.

Carroll, 1997, Long-term evolutionary changes in organizational populations: theory, models and empirical findings in industrial demography, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 119, 10.1093/icc/6.1.119

Cooke, 1997, Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions, Research Policy, 26, 475, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5

Dahmén, 1988, ‘Development blocks’ in industrial economics, Scandinavian Economic History Review, 36, 3, 10.1080/03585522.1988.10408102

Das, 2000, Competing with new product technologies: a process model of strategy, Management Science, 46, 1300, 10.1287/mnsc.46.10.1300.12276

Davies, 1996, Innovation in large technical systems: the case of telecommunications, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 1143, 10.1093/icc/5.4.1143

Dosi, 1982, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy, 11, 147, 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

1990

Edquist, 1997, Systems of innovation approaches—their emergence and characteristics

Edquist, C., 1999. Innovation policy—a systemic approach. TEMA-T Working paper. Linköping University, Linköping.

Edquist, 2004, Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges

Edquist, 1997, Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation, 41

Erickson, 1989, Healthy industries and public policy

Freeman, 1987

Freeman, 2002

Galli, 1997, Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems, 342

Geels, 2004, From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Research Policy, 33, 897, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015

Hekkert, 2007, Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analyzing technological change, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002

Holmén, M., 2001. Emergence of regional actor systems—generic technologies and the search for useful and saleable applications. PhD Thesis. Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.

Holmén, 2000, A method for identifying actors in a knowledge based cluster, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9, 331, 10.1080/10438590000000013

Hughes, 1983

Hughes, 1990, The evolution of large technological systems, 51

Jacobsson, 2004, Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 815, 10.1093/icc/dth032

Jacobsson, 2000, The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research, Energy Policy, 28, 625, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00041-0

Jacobsson, 2006, The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology, Energy Policy, 34, 256, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029

Jacobsson, 2004, Transforming the energy system—the evolution of the German technological system for solar cells, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16, 3, 10.1080/0953732032000199061

Johnson, A., 1998. Functions in innovation system approaches. Unpublished Working Paper. Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.

Johnson, 2001, Functions in innovation system approaches

Johnson, 2001, Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the development of a new industry: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden

Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310

Klein Woolthuis, 2005, A system failure framework for innovation policy design, Technovation, 25, 609, 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002

Layton, 1974, Technology as knowledge, Technology and Culture, 15, 31, 10.2307/3102759

Lieberman, 1988, First-mover advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41, 10.1002/smj.4250090706

Lindblom, 1959, The science of “muddling through”, Public Administration Quarterly, 19, 79, 10.2307/973677

Lindmark, 2005, Dynamics and functionality of the Swedish mobile Internet innovation system

Liu, 2001, Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context, Research Policy, 30, 1091, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00132-3

1992

Lundvall, 1992, Introduction, 1

Malerba, F., 1996. Public Policy and Industrial Dynamics: an Evolutionary Perspective. Report submitted to the European Commission.

Malerba, 2002, Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, 31, 247, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1

Marshall, 1920

Maskell, 2001, Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 921, 10.1093/icc/10.4.921

McLoughlin, 2000, Rethinking political process in technological change: socio-technical configurations and frames, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12, 17, 10.1080/095373200107210

Metcalfe, 1992

Metcalfe, 2004

Myrdal, 1957

Nelson, 1992, National innovation systems: a retrospective on a study, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 347, 10.1093/icc/1.2.347

North, 1994, Economic performance through time, The American Economic Review, 84, 359

Oltander, G., Perez Vico, E., 2005. A survey of the Swedish security industry and an innovation system analysis of the Swedish security sensor industry. Master Thesis Report No. 2005:1. Department of Innovation Engineering and Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.

Porter, 1990, The competitive advantage of nations, Harvard Business Review, 68, 73

Porter, 2000, Location. Competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy, Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15, 10.1177/089124240001400105

Rao, 2004, Institutional activism in the early American automobile industry, Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 359, 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00036-3

Rickne, A., 2000. New Technology-Based Firms and Industrial Dynamics. Evidence from the Technological System of Biomaterials in Sweden, Ohio and Massachusetts. PhD Thesis. Department of Industrial Dynamics. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.

Rosenberg, 1976

Rosenberg, 1996, Uncertainty and technological change, 334

Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution. Transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003

Sabatier, 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 98, 10.1080/13501768880000051

Scitovsky, 1954, Two concepts of external economies, Journal of Political Economy, 62, 143, 10.1086/257498

Smith, 1776

Smith, 2000, Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy, Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1, 73, 10.1080/146324400363536

Smits, 2002, Strengthening interfaces in innovation systems: rationale, concepts and (new) instruments

Stigler, 1947

Suchman, 1995, Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20, 571, 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Unruh, 2000, Understanding carbon lock-in, Energy Policy, 28, 817, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7

Van de Ven, 1993, The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 211, 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90028-4

van Lente, 1993, Promising technology

von Hippel, 1988

Walker, 2000, Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations, Research Policy, 29, 833, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6

Young, 1928, Increasing returns and economic progress, Economic Journal, 38, 527, 10.2307/2224097

Zimmerman, 2002, Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy, Academy of Management Review, 27, 414, 10.5465/amr.2002.7389921