Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersson, 2000, Monitoring and assessing technology choice: the case of solar cells, Energy Policy, 28, 1037, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00090-2
Asheim, 1997, Localisation agglomeration and innovation: towards regional innovation systems in Norway?, European Planning Studies, 5, 299, 10.1080/09654319708720402
Bergek, A., 2002. Shaping and exploiting technological opportunities: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden. PhD thesis. Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
Bergek, 2003, The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries, 197
Bergek, 2004, Do innovation strategies matter? A comparison of two electro-technical corporations 1988–1998
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., Rickne, A., 2005. Analyzing the dynamics and functionality of sectoral innovation systems—a manual, report delivered to VINNOVA, 30 March 2005. In: The Proceedings of the DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005. June 25–27, Copenhagen.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Hekkert, M., 2007a. Functions in innovation systems: a framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers. In: Foxon, T., Köhler, J., Oughton, C. (Eds.), Innovations for a Low Carbon Economy: Economic, Institutional and Management Approaches. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Hekkert, M., Smith, K., 2007b. Functionality of innovation systems as a rationale for, and guide to innovation policy. In: Smits, R., Kuhlmann, S., Shapira, P. (Eds.), Innovation Policy, Theory and Practice. An International Handbook. Elgar Publishers.
Bijker, 1995
Breschi, 1997, Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries
Breschi, 2000, Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation, The Economic Journal, 110, 388, 10.1111/1468-0297.00530
Cantner, 2004, Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 543, 10.1007/s00191-004-0229-5
Carlsson, 2003, The new economy: what is new and what is not?
Carlsson, 1993, Technological systems and economic performance: the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden, 77
Carlsson, 1997, In search of a useful technology policy—general lessons and key issues for policy makers, 299
Carlsson, 1991, On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93, 10.1007/BF01224915
Carlsson, 1995, On the nature. Function and composition of technological systems, 21
Carlsson, 2002, Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues, Research Policy, 21, 233, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A., 2005. Dynamics of innovation systems—policy-making in a complex and non-deterministic world, under review.
Carroll, 1997, Long-term evolutionary changes in organizational populations: theory, models and empirical findings in industrial demography, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 119, 10.1093/icc/6.1.119
Cooke, 1997, Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions, Research Policy, 26, 475, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
Dahmén, 1988, ‘Development blocks’ in industrial economics, Scandinavian Economic History Review, 36, 3, 10.1080/03585522.1988.10408102
Das, 2000, Competing with new product technologies: a process model of strategy, Management Science, 46, 1300, 10.1287/mnsc.46.10.1300.12276
Davies, 1996, Innovation in large technical systems: the case of telecommunications, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 1143, 10.1093/icc/5.4.1143
Dosi, 1982, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy, 11, 147, 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
1990
Edquist, 1997, Systems of innovation approaches—their emergence and characteristics
Edquist, C., 1999. Innovation policy—a systemic approach. TEMA-T Working paper. Linköping University, Linköping.
Edquist, 2004, Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges
Edquist, 1997, Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation, 41
Erickson, 1989, Healthy industries and public policy
Freeman, 1987
Freeman, 2002
Galli, 1997, Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems, 342
Geels, 2004, From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Research Policy, 33, 897, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
Hekkert, 2007, Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analyzing technological change, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
Holmén, M., 2001. Emergence of regional actor systems—generic technologies and the search for useful and saleable applications. PhD Thesis. Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
Holmén, 2000, A method for identifying actors in a knowledge based cluster, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9, 331, 10.1080/10438590000000013
Hughes, 1983
Hughes, 1990, The evolution of large technological systems, 51
Jacobsson, 2004, Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 815, 10.1093/icc/dth032
Jacobsson, 2000, The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research, Energy Policy, 28, 625, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00041-0
Jacobsson, 2006, The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology, Energy Policy, 34, 256, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029
Jacobsson, 2004, Transforming the energy system—the evolution of the German technological system for solar cells, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16, 3, 10.1080/0953732032000199061
Johnson, A., 1998. Functions in innovation system approaches. Unpublished Working Paper. Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
Johnson, 2001, Functions in innovation system approaches
Johnson, 2001, Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the development of a new industry: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden
Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310
Klein Woolthuis, 2005, A system failure framework for innovation policy design, Technovation, 25, 609, 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
Lieberman, 1988, First-mover advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41, 10.1002/smj.4250090706
Lindblom, 1959, The science of “muddling through”, Public Administration Quarterly, 19, 79, 10.2307/973677
Lindmark, 2005, Dynamics and functionality of the Swedish mobile Internet innovation system
Liu, 2001, Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context, Research Policy, 30, 1091, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00132-3
1992
Lundvall, 1992, Introduction, 1
Malerba, F., 1996. Public Policy and Industrial Dynamics: an Evolutionary Perspective. Report submitted to the European Commission.
Malerba, 2002, Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, 31, 247, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
Marshall, 1920
Maskell, 2001, Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 921, 10.1093/icc/10.4.921
McLoughlin, 2000, Rethinking political process in technological change: socio-technical configurations and frames, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12, 17, 10.1080/095373200107210
Metcalfe, 1992
Metcalfe, 2004
Myrdal, 1957
Nelson, 1992, National innovation systems: a retrospective on a study, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 347, 10.1093/icc/1.2.347
North, 1994, Economic performance through time, The American Economic Review, 84, 359
Oltander, G., Perez Vico, E., 2005. A survey of the Swedish security industry and an innovation system analysis of the Swedish security sensor industry. Master Thesis Report No. 2005:1. Department of Innovation Engineering and Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
Porter, 1990, The competitive advantage of nations, Harvard Business Review, 68, 73
Porter, 2000, Location. Competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy, Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15, 10.1177/089124240001400105
Rao, 2004, Institutional activism in the early American automobile industry, Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 359, 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00036-3
Rickne, A., 2000. New Technology-Based Firms and Industrial Dynamics. Evidence from the Technological System of Biomaterials in Sweden, Ohio and Massachusetts. PhD Thesis. Department of Industrial Dynamics. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
Rosenberg, 1976
Rosenberg, 1996, Uncertainty and technological change, 334
Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution. Transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003
Sabatier, 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 98, 10.1080/13501768880000051
Scitovsky, 1954, Two concepts of external economies, Journal of Political Economy, 62, 143, 10.1086/257498
Smith, 1776
Smith, 2000, Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy, Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1, 73, 10.1080/146324400363536
Smits, 2002, Strengthening interfaces in innovation systems: rationale, concepts and (new) instruments
Stigler, 1947
Suchman, 1995, Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20, 571, 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Van de Ven, 1993, The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 211, 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90028-4
van Lente, 1993, Promising technology
von Hippel, 1988
Walker, 2000, Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations, Research Policy, 29, 833, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6