Analyzing the Relationships between Individual Criminal Behavior and the Severity and Probability of Punishment

Olof Dahlbäck1
1Department of Sociology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Tóm tắt

This paper deals with problems encountered in analyzing how an individual is deterred from committing a crime by the severity and probability of punishment. It is argued that it might be advantageous to base such an analysis on a model of maximization of expected utility. According to this model, the attractiveness of committing a crime is strongly affected by the product of the relative utility of committing the crime and being punished as compared with the utility of not committing the crime times the probability of the punishment. This implies that the bivariate linear relationships of choices to commit or not to commit crime and the severity and probability factors are dependent on the variations in both these factors and their mean values. In this paper, these bivariate relationships are analyzed in two ways – formally-algebraically and by numerical examples.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Becker, G.S. (1974). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In: G.S. Becker & W.M. Landes (eds), Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–54.

Carroll, J.S. (1978). A psychological approach to deterrence: The evaluation of crime opportunities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 1512–1520.

Carroll, J.S. (1982). Committing a crime: The offender's decision. In: V.J. Konecni & E.B. Ebbesen (eds), The Criminal Justice System. A Social-Psychological Analysis. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, pp. 49–67.

Carroll, J.S. (1987). Compliance with the law: A decision-making approach to taxpaying. Law and Human Behavior 11: 319–335.

Dahlbäck, O. (1990). Criminality and risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences 11: 265–272.

Dawes, R.M. & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 81: 95–106.

Decker, S., Wright, R. & Logie, R. (1993). Perceptual deterrence among active residential burglars: A research note. Criminology 31: 135–147.

Ehrlich, I. (1974). Participation in illegitimate activities: An economic analysis. In: G.S. Becker & W.M. Landes (eds), Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 68–134.

Gibbs, J.P. (1975). Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.

Gibbs, J.P. (1986). Deterrence theory and research. In: G.B. Melton (ed.), The Law as a Behavioral Instrument. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 87–130.

Gibbs, J.P. & Firebaugh, G. (1990). The artifact issue in deterrence research. Criminology 28: 347–367.

Grasmick, H.G. & Bryjak, G.J. (1980). The deterrence effect of perceived severity of punishment. Social Forces 59: 471–491.

Grasmick, H.G. & Bursik, R.J. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review 24: 837–861.

Grasmick, H.G. & Green, D.E. (1980). Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 71: 325–335.

Howe, E.S. & Brandau, C.J. (1988). Additive effects of certainty, severity, and celerity of punishment on judgements of crime deterrence scale value. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18: 796–812.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263–291.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American 246: 136–142.

Klepper, S. & Nagin, D. (1989). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology 27: 721–746.

Lattimore, P. & Witte, A. (1986). Models of decision making under uncertainty: The criminal choice. In: D.B. Cornish & R.V. Clarke (eds), The Reasoning Criminal. Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 129–155.

Minor, W.W. & Harry, J. (1982). Deterrent and experiential effects in perceptual deterrence research: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 19: 190–203.

Nisbett, R. & Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology 29: 261–265.

Paternoster, R., Salzman, L.E., Chiricos, T.G. & Waldo, G.P. (1982). Perceived risk and deterrence: Methodological artifacts in perceptual deterrence research. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 73: 1238–1258.

Payne, J.W. (1973). Alternative approaches to decision making under risk: Moments versus risk dimensions. Psychological Bulletin 80: 439–453.

Payne, J.W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16: 366–387.

Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. & Johnson, E.J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 87–131.

Piliavin, I., Gartner, R., Thornton, C. & Matsueda, R.L. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review 51: 101–119.

Salzman, L., Paternoster, R., Waldo, G.P. & Chiricos, T.G. (1982). Deterrent and experiential effects: The problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 19: 172–189.

Shanteau, J. (1975). An information-integration analysis of risky decision making. In: M.F. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (eds), Human Judgment and Decision Processes. New York: Academic Press, pp. 109–137.

Silberman, M. (1976). Toward a theory of criminal deterrence. American Sociological Review 41: 442–461.

Slovic, P. & Lichtenstein, S. (1968). The relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78(3): Part 2.

Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S. & Fischhoff, B. (1988). Decision making. In: R.C. Atkinson, R.J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey & R.D. Luce (eds), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 2nd edn, Vol. 2: Learning and Cognition. New York: Wiley, pp. 673–738.

Stewart, C.H.M. & Hemsley, D.R. (1979). Risk perception and likelihood of action in criminal offenders. British Journal of Criminology 19: 105–119.

Tauchen, H.V., Witte, A.D. & Beron, K.J. (1993). Tax compliance: An investigation using individual Taxpayer Compliance Measurement Program (TCMP) data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 9: 177–202.

Thurman, Q.C. (1989). General prevention of tax evasion: A factorial survey approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 5: 127–146.

Tittle, C.R. (1969). Crime rates and legal sanctions. Social Problems 16: 409–423.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59: 251–278.

von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Waldo, G.P. & Chiricos, T.G. (1972). Perceived penal sanction and self-reported criminality: A neglected approach to deterrence research. Social Problems 19: 522–540.

Williams, K. & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law & Society Review 20: 545–572.