Analyzing the Determinants Affecting the Industrial Competitiveness of Electronics Manufacturing in India by Using TISM and AHP
Tóm tắt
In today’s world, the manufacturing organizations have to plan their strategies differently in order to attain competitiveness. The changing consumer demand, demographic priorities, new technologies, and changing attitudes pose threats to existing business strategies and curtails life cycle of electronics goods. With the emergence of new technologies, most of the organizations are feeling the pressure to deliver the latest technology goods and services in short span of time. This study focuses on the determinants which form the basis for the competitiveness of electronics-manufacturing industries (EMI) in India. Extensive literature studies have been performed to identify such determinants. These determinants are discussed with a group of experts to make the finalized set. The total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) is applied to interpret the complexity of inter-relationships among the determinants. Along with this, the weight of each determinant has been calculated using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The paper will serve the dual value; first, it explores the EMI competitiveness and second, it prescribes usage of ranking of determinants by TISM–AHP method, a unified approach that can be used in ranking for multi-criteria problems in an interpretive manner. The findings suggest that the determinants such as market demand, government support policies, capital investments with higher driving power have higher weights in AHP model, which are further validated by the findings of TISM. Determinants with high driving power obtained from TISM and AHP draw almost same conclusions in terms of importance and rankings. The study will benefit policy makers, stakeholders, and manufacturing industries to gain competitive advantage by learning and implementing the suggested findings.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agarwal, S. M. (1985). Electronics in India: Past strategies and future possibilities. World Development, 13(3), 273–292.
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.
Awasthi, A. K., & Li, J. (2017). Management of electrical and electronic waste: A comparative evaluation of China and India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 434–447.
Bahinipati, B. K., Kanda, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2009). Horizontal collaboration in semiconductor manufacturing industry supply chain: An evaluation of collaboration intensity index. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 57(3), 880–895.
Basak, I. (1988). When to combine group judgments and when not to in the analytic hierarchy process: A new method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 10(6), 395–404.
Bowonder, B., & Miyake, T. (1990). Technology development and Japanese industrial competitiveness. Futures, 22(1), 21–45.
Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2016). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: Antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 516–538.
Denny, M., Bernstein, J., Fuss, M., Nakamura, S., & Waverman, L. (1992). Productivity in manufacturing industries, Canada, Japan and the United States, 1953–1986: Was the ‘productivity slowdown’ reversed? Canadian Journal of Economics, 25(3), 584–603.
Department of Industrial Policy and Promotions (DIPP). (2016). FDI statistics, India.
Dewangan, D. K., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2015). Enablers for competitiveness of Indian manufacturing sector: An ISM-fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 416–432.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Sushil, S., & Singh, T. (2015). Building theory of sustainable manufacturing using total interpretive structural modelling. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 2(4), 231–247.
Ernst, D. (2005). Global production networks in East Asia’s electronics industry and upgrading perspectives in Malaysia. In: Yusuf, S., Anjum Altaf, M., Nabeshima, K. (Eds.), Global Production Networking and Technological Change in East Asia, The World Bank and Oxford University Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2769691
Ernst, D. (2014). Upgrading India’s electronics manufacturing industry: Regulatory reform and industrial policy. East-West Center Special Study. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2395030
Ernst, D., & O’Connor, D. A. V. I. D. (2014). Competing in the electronics industry. The Experience of Newly Industrialising Economies.
Ferdows, K., & De Meyer, A. (1990). Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory. Journal of Operations management, 9(2), 168–184.
Fu, R., James, T. L., & Woodhouse, M. (2015). Economic measurements of polysilicon for the photovoltaic industry: Market competition and manufacturing competitiveness. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 5(2), 515–524.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Knowledge and Strategy, 33(3), 3–23.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.
Größler, A., & Grübner, A. (2006). An empirical model of the relationships between manufacturing capabilities. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(5), 458–485.
Guhathakurta, S. (1994). Electronics policy and the television manufacturing industry: Lessons from India’s liberalization efforts. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42(4), 845–868.
Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 365–387.
Haake, S. (2002). National business systems and industry-specific competitiveness. Organization Studies, 23(5), 711–736.
Hatsopoulos, G. N., Krugman, P. R., & Summers, L. H. (1988). US competitiveness: Beyond the trade deficit. Science, 241(4863), 299–307.
Hong, W. C. (2009). Global competitiveness measurement for the tourism sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 12(2), 105–132.
Huggins, R., & Izushi, H. (2015). The competitive advantage of nations: Origins and journey. Competitiveness Review, 25(5), 458–470.
Jayalakshmi, B., & Pramod, V. R. (2015). Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) of the enablers of a flexible control system for industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(1), 63–85.
Kamps, X., de Vries, H., & van de Kaa, G. (2017). Exploring standards consortium survival in high tech industries: The effects of commitment and internal competition. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 52, 105–113.
Khan, M. U. (1998). A comparison of the electronics industry of India and Korea. Technovation, 18(2), 111–123.
Koufteros, X. A., Vonderembse, M. A., & Doll, W. J. (2002). Examining the competitive capabilities of manufacturing firms. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 256–282.
Kudrle, R. T. (1996). Three perspectives on competitiveness: an introduction to “Made in America”. Thunderbird International Business Review, 38(4), 403–429.
Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2016, Sept.). Smart Governance for Smart Cities: A conceptual framework from social media practices. In Conference on e-business, e-services and e-society (pp. 628–634). Springer International Publishing.
Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., Gupta, M. P., & Madaan, J. (2017). Smart neighbourhood: A TISM approach to reduce urban polarization for the sustainable development of smart cities. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2017-0009
Lall, S. (1987). Learning to industrialize: The acquisition of technological capability by India. Berlin: Springer.
Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: An economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World Development, 29(9), 1501–1525.
Lau, A. K., Baark, E., Lo, W. L., & Sharif, N. (2013). The effects of innovation sources and capabilities on product competitiveness in Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 220–236.
Li, L. X. (2000). An analysis of sources of competitiveness and performance of Chinese manufacturers. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(3), 299–315.
Liu, W. H. (2005). Determinants of the semiconductor industry cycles. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27(7), 853–866.
Madu, C. N., & Kuei, C. H. (1995). Stability analyses of group decision making. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 28(4), 881–892.
Marakanon, L., & Panjakajornsak, V. (2017). Perceived quality, perceived risk and customer trust affecting customer loyalty of environmentally friendly electronics products. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 24–30.
Mashhadi, A. R., Esmaeilian, B., Cade, W., Wiens, K., & Behdad, S. (2016). Mining consumer experiences of repairing electronics: Product design insights and business lessons learned. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 716–727.
Massari, S., & Ruberti, M. (2013). Rare earth elements as critical raw materials: Focus on international markets and future strategies. Resources Policy, 38(1), 36–43.
Matsuo, H. (2015). Implications of the Tohoku earthquake for Toyota's coordination mechanism: Supply chain disruption of automotive semiconductors. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 217–227.
Meity. (2017). ICTE manufacturing. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. http://meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/ICTE_Manufacturing_Presentation_to_the_PM_vFinal.pdf.
Meleo, L. (2014). On the determinants of industrial competitiveness: The European Union emission trading scheme and the Italian paper industry. Energy Policy, 74, 535–546.
Moon, H. C., & Peery, N. (1986). Competitiveness of product, firm, industry and nation in a global business. Competitiveness Review, 5, 37–43.
Najmi, M., & Kehoe, D. F. (2001). The role of performance measurement systems in promoting quality development beyond ISO 9000. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(1/2), 159–172.
National Policy on Electronics (NPE). (2012). Department of electronics and information technology. Government of India: Ministry of Communication and Information Technology.
Noble, M. A. (1995). Manufacturing strategy: Testing the cumulative model in a multiple country context. Decision Sciences, 26(5), 693–721.
Oral, M. (1986). An industrial competitiveness model. IIE transactions, 18(2), 148–157.
Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137–145.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competition. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1990a). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1990b). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.
Porter, M. E. (1997). Competitive strategy. Measuring Business Excellence, 1(2), 12–17.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition (Vol. 76(6), pp. 77–90). Boston: Springer.
Porter, M. E. (1999). Microeconomic competitiveness: Findings from the 1999 executive survey. In The global competitiveness report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.
Porter, M. E. (2004). Building the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index. In M. E. Porter, K. Schwab, & X. S. Martin (Eds.), The global competitiveness report 2003–2004 (pp. 29–56). USA: Oxford University Press.
Porter, M. E., Ketels, C., & Delgado, M. (2007). The microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index. The global competitiveness report 2007–2008 (pp. 51–81). Geneva: Word Economic Forum.
Prakash, C., & Barua, M. K. (2016). A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 7, 66–78.
Rajesh, R., & Ravi, V. (2017). Analyzing drivers of risks in electronic supply chains: A grey—DEMATEL approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 92(1–4), 1127–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0118-3
Reinaud, J. (2005). Industrial competitiveness under the European Union emissions trading scheme. Oil, Gas and Energy Law Journal (OGEL), 3(1).
Rosenberg, N., & Steinmueller, W. E. (1988). Why are Americans such poor imitators? The American Economic Review, 78(2), 229–234.
Rugman, A. M. (1992). Porter takes the wrong turn. Business Quarterly, 56(3), 59–64.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.
Singh, M. K., Kumar, H., & Gupta, M. P. (2017). Role of manufacturing sector to develop smart economy: A competitiveness study between India and China. In Advances in smart cities—smarter people, governance and solutions. Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN: 9781498795708.
Singh, M. K., Kumar, H., Gupta, M. P., & Madaan, J. (2016, Sept.). The social media cone: Towards achieving the manufacturing competitiveness goals. In Conference on e-business, e-services and e-society (pp. 53–58). Springer International Publishing.
Sirikrai, S. B., & Tang, J. C. (2006). Industrial competitiveness analysis: Using the analytic hierarchy process. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(1), 71–83.
Srinivasan, T. N., & Krueger, A. (2005, Jan.). Information-technology-enabled services and India’s growth prospects [with comment and discussion]. In Brookings trade forum (pp. 203–240). Brookings Institution Press.
Sushil. (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106.
Sushil. (2016). How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models? Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2312-3.
Sushil. (2017a). Multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with big data framework. Production Planning and Control. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1336794.
Sushil. (2017b). Modified ISM/TISM process with simultaneous transitivity checks for reducing direct pair comparisons. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(4), 331–351.
Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F., & Cagnazzo, L. (2010). Performance measurement and management: A literature review and a research agenda. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(1), 4–18.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S. G., Gupta, A. D., & Shankar, R. (2006). Development of a balanced scorecard: An integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(1), 25–59.
Warfield, J. N. (1974). Towards interpretation of complex structural models. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC–4(5), 405–417.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2016). Modeling post-disaster challenges of humanitarian supply chains: A TISM approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(3), 321–340.