Analyzing students’ e-learning usage and post-usage outcomes in higher education

Sintema, 2020, Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: implications for STEM education, Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ, 16, em1851, 10.29333/ejmste/7893 UNESCO. Education: from disruption to recovery. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization: UNESCO. 2021. Available Online: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse. Accessed 05 August 2021. Jena, 2020, Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on education in India, Int J Curr Res IJCR, 12, 12582 Hodges C.B., Moore S., Lockee B.B., Trust T., & Bond M.A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27 March. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/thedifference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning. Accessed 02 August 2021. Naujoks, 2021, Self-regulated resource management in emergency remote higher education: status quo and predictors, Front Psychol, 12, 1929, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672741 Adedoyin, 2020, Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities, Interact learn Environ., 1 Branch, 2015, Survey of instructional development models, Assoc Educ Commun Technol AECT Broadbent, 2017, Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance, Internet High Educ, 33, 24, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004 Bruso, 2020, An examination of personality traits as a predictor of the use of self-regulated learning strategies and considerations for online instruction, Educ Technol Res Dev, 68, 2659, 10.1007/s11423-020-09797-y Kocdar, 2018, Measuring self-regulation in self-paced open and distance learning environments, Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn, 19, 23 Martin, 2020, A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018, Comput Educ, 159, 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009 Wong, 2019, Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: a systematic review, Int J Hum Comput Interact, 35, 356, 10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084 Abuhammad, 2020, Barriers to distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative review from parents’ perspective, Heliyon, 6, e05482, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05482 Baticulon, 2021, Barriers to Online Learning in the Time of COVID-19: a national survey of medical students in the philippines, Med Sci Educ, 31, 615, 10.1007/s40670-021-01231-z Mailizar, 2021, Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: an extended TAM model, Educ Inf Technol, 26, 7057, 10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5 Chou, 2021, A multigroup analysis of factors underlying teachers’ technostress and their continuance intention toward online teaching, Comput Educ, 175 Daniel, 2020, Education and the COVID-19 pandemic, Prospects, 49, 91, 10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3 Hanham, 2021, The influence of technology acceptance, academic self-efficacy, and gender on academic achievement through online tutoring, Comput Educ, 172 Aguilera-Hermida, 2021, Comparison of students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19 in the USA, Mexico, Peru, and Turkey, Educ Inf Technol, 26, 6823, 10.1007/s10639-021-10473-8 Clark, 2021, Compensating for academic loss: online learning and student performance during the COVID-19 pandemic, China Econ Rev, 68, 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101629 Gonzalez, 2020, Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education, PLoS One, 15, 10.1371/journal.pone.0239490 Iglesias-Pradas, 2021, Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study, Comput Human Behav, 119, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713 Gopal R., Singh V., & Aggarwal A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Educ Inf Technol 26(6), 6923–47. 10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1. Hettiarachchi, 2021, Student satisfaction with online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a study at state universities in Sri Lanka, Sustainability, 13, 11749, 10.3390/su132111749 Chakraborty, 2021, Opinion of students on online education during the COVID-19 pandemic, Hum Behav Emerg Technol, 3, 357, 10.1002/hbe2.240 Shetty, 2022, Academic crisis during COVID 19: online classes, a panacea for imminent doctors, Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 74, 45, 10.1007/s12070-020-02224-x Sindiani, 2020, Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan, Ann Med Surg, 59, 186, 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036 Yao, 2022, Innovative online learning strategies for the successful construction of student self-awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic: merging TAM with TPB, J Innov Knowl, 7, 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252 Asadi, 2020, Cloud computing services adoption among higher education faculties: development of a standardized questionnaire, Educ Inf Technol, 25, 175, 10.1007/s10639-019-09932-0 Wang, 2020, Improving MOOC learning performance in China: an analysis of factors from the TAM and TPB, Comput Appl Eng Educ, 28, 1421, 10.1002/cae.22310 Lazim, 2021, Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) toward online learning during covid-19 pandemic: accounting students perspective, Int J Econ Bus, 24, 13 Qu, 2021, Are emotions important for college teachers’ intentions to use the online learning system? An integrated model of TAM and PAD, Int J Inf Educ Technol, 11, 73 Azjen, 1980 Ajzen, 1991, The theory of planned behavior, Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 50, 179, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Ajzen, 2001, Nature and operation of attitudes, Annu Rev Psychol, 52, 27, 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27 García Botero, 2018, Acceptance and usage of mobile assisted language learning by higher education students, J Comput High Educ, 30, 426, 10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1 Taylor, 1995, Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions, Int J Res Mark, 12, 137, 10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K Cruz-Cárdenas, 2019, Role of demographic factors, attitudes toward technology, and cultural values in the prediction of technology-based consumer behaviors: a study in developing and emerging countries, Technol Forecast Soc Change, 149 Hwang, 2021, Investigating consumer innovativeness in the context of drone food delivery services: its impact on attitude and behavioral intentions, Technol Forecast Soc Change, 163, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120433 Davis, 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Q, 13, 319, 10.2307/249008 Cheng, 2018, Student continuance of learning management system use: a longitudinal exploration, Comput Educ, 120, 241, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.004 Teo, 2019, Factors that influence university students’ intention to use Moodle: a study in Macau, Educ Technol Res Dev, 67, 749, 10.1007/s11423-019-09650-x Yi, 2006, Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT-based innovations: comparative analyses of models and measures, Decis Sci, 37, 393, 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00132.x Straub, 2009, Understanding technology adoption: theory and future directions for informal learning, Rev Educ Res, 79, 625, 10.3102/0034654308325896 Mou, 2022, Exploring the mediator in science service learning: analysis of university students’ behavioural intention to use digital platforms, Asia Pac Educ Res, 1 Teo, 2009, Modelling technology acceptance in education: a study of pre-service teachers, Comput Educ, 52, 302, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 Abdullah, 2016, Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios, Comput Human Behav, 63, 75, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 Cheung, 2013, Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning, Comput Educ, 63, 160, 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003 Lee, 2010, Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: an extension of the expectation–confirmation model, Comput Educ, 54, 506, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002 Alturki, 2022, Students’ perceptions of the actual use of mobile learning during COVID-19 pandemic in higher education, Sustainability, 14, 1125, 10.3390/su14031125 Liu, 2010, Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: an empirical study, Comput Educ, 55, 1211, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018 Nikou, 2017, Mobile-based assessment: investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use, Comput Educ, 109, 56, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005 Sánchez-Prieto, 2017, MLearning and pre-service teachers: an assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model, Comput Human Behav, 72, 644, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061 Alsabawy, 2016, Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems, Comput Human Behav, 64, 843, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.065 Cheng, 2012, Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance, Internet Res, 22, 361, 10.1108/10662241211235699 Khlaif, 2022, Impact of technostress on continuance intentions to use mobile technology, Asia Pac Educ Res, 32, 151 Salloum, 2019, Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model, IEEE Access, 7, 128445, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467 Wong, 2015, Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers of primary mathematics in Hong Kong, Australas J Educ Technol, 31, 713, 10.14742/ajet.1890 Elkaseh, 2016, Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of social media for e-learning in Libyan higher education: a structural equation modeling analysis, Int J Inf Educ Technol, 6, 192 Limayem, 2011, Predicting the continued use of Internet-based learning technologies: the role of habit, Behav Inf Technol, 30, 91, 10.1080/0144929X.2010.490956 Teo, 2011, Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: model development and test, Comput Educ, 57, 2432, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008 Al-Okaily, 2020, Dataset on the acceptance of e-learning system among universities students’ under the COVID-19 pandemic conditions, Data Brief, 32 Baber, 2021, Modelling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-a study of South Korea, Int J Manag Educ, 19, 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503 Drueke, 2021, An evaluation of forced distance learning and teaching under pandemic conditions using the technology acceptance model, Front Psychol, 12, 4533, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701347 Rizun, 2020, Students’ acceptance of the COVID-19 impact on shifting higher education to distance learning in Poland, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17, 6468, 10.3390/ijerph17186468 Brown, 2005, Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle, MIS Q, 29, 399, 10.2307/25148690 Venkatesh, 2012, Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, MIS Q, 36, 157, 10.2307/41410412 Teo, 2011, An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a structural equation modeling approach, Comput Educ, 57, 1645, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002 Thong, 2006, The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance, Int J Hum Comput Stud, 64, 799, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001 Nikolopoulou, 2021, Habit, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy and technological pedagogical knowledge affect teachers’ intention to use mobile internet, Comput Educ Open, 2, 10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100041 Alalwan, 2015, Consumer adoption of Internet banking in Jordan: examining the role of hedonic motivation, habit, self-efficacy and trust, J Financ Serv Mark, 20, 145, 10.1057/fsm.2015.5 Anand, 2019, Impact of hedonic motivation on consumer satisfaction towards online shopping: evidence from Malaysia, E Serv J, 11, 56, 10.2979/eservicej.11.1.03 To, 2007, Shopping motivations on Internet: a study based on utilitarian and hedonic value, Technovation, 27, 774, 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.01.001 Al-Azawei, 2020, Predicting the intention to use and hedonic motivation for mobile learning: a comparative study in two middle eastern countries, Technol Soc, 62 Moorthy, 2019, Habit and hedonic motivation are the strongest influences in mobile learning behaviours among higher education students in Malaysia, Australas J Educ Technol, 35, 10.14742/ajet.4432 Oluwajana, 2019, The adoption of students’ hedonic motivation system model to gamified learning environment, J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res, 14, 156, 10.4067/S0718-18762019000300109 Saadé, 2015, Discovering the motivations of students when using an online learning tool, J Inf Technol Educ Res, 14, 283 Zhang, 2008, Extending TAM for online learning systems: an intrinsic motivation perspective, Tsinghua Sci Technol, 13, 312, 10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70050-6 Sitar-Tăut, 2021, Mobile learning acceptance in social distancing during the COVID-19 outbreak: the mediation effect of hedonic motivation, Hum Behav Emerg Technol, 3, 366, 10.1002/hbe2.261 Gillis, 2020, COVID-19 remote learning transition in spring 2020: class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses, Teach Sociol, 48, 283, 10.1177/0092055X20954263 Liu, 2021, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation towards the online component of blended learning in accounting education: evidence from a Malaysian public university, Qual Assur Educ, 29, 293, 10.1108/QAE-12-2020-0152 Schepers, 2007, A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects, Inf Manag, 44, 90, 10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007 Venkatesh, 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Manage Sci, 46, 186, 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Chang, 2017, Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? the general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach, Comput Educ, 111, 128, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010 Park, 2009, An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning, J Educ Technol Soc, 12, 150 Almaiah, 2020, Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic, Educ Inf Technol, 25, 5261, 10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y Fawaz, 2021, E-learning: depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology among Lebanese university students during COVID-19 quarantine, Nurs Forum, 56, 52, 10.1111/nuf.12521 Alemi, 2015, The impact of social robotics on L2 learners’ anxiety and attitude in english vocabulary acquisition, Int J Soc Robot, 7, 523, 10.1007/s12369-015-0286-y Hussain, 2011, Anxiety and attitude of secondary school students towards foreign language learning, Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 29, 583, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.279 Tandon, 2021, Factors influencing adoption of online teaching by school teachers: a study during COVID-19 pandemic, J Public Aff, 21, e2503, 10.1002/pa.2503 Datta, 2011, A preliminary study of ecommerce adoption in developing countries, Inf Syst J, 21, 3, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00344.x El-Masri, 2017, Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2), Educ Technol Res Dev, 65, 743, 10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8 Guo, 2020, Students’ perceptions of using mobile technologies in informal english learning during the COVID-19 epidemic: a study in chinese rural secondary schools, J Pedagog Res, 4, 475, 10.33902/JPR.2020063786 Althunibat, 2022, Propose a New Quality Model for M-Learning Application in Light of COVID-19, Mob Inf Syst Lutfi, 2022, Actual use of mobile learning technologies during social distancing circumstances: case study of king faisal university students, Sustainability, 14, 7323, 10.3390/su14127323 Petter, 2008, Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships, Eur J Inf Syst, 17, 236, 10.1057/ejis.2008.15 Wu, 2012, Toward a better understanding of behavioral intention and system usage constructs, Eur J Inf Syst, 21, 680, 10.1057/ejis.2012.15 Maillet, 2015, Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an Electronic Patient Record in acute care settings: an extension of the UTAUT, Int J Med Inform, 84, 36, 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.004 Tarafdar, 2010, Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance, J Manag Inf Syst, 27, 303, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270311 Devadoss, 1996, Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance, Am J Agric Econ, 78, 499, 10.2307/1243268 Nyamapfene, 2010, Does class attendance still matter?, Eng Educ, 5, 64, 10.11120/ened.2010.05010064 Sunday, 2020, Analyzing student performance in programming education using classification techniques, Int J Emerg Technol Learn IJET, 15, 127, 10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11527 Lu, 2022, Online engagement and performance on formative assessments mediate the relationship between attendance and course performance, Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 19, 1, 10.1186/s41239-021-00307-5 Diab-Bahman, 2022, The effect of attendance on student performance: implications of using virtual learning on overall performance, J Appl Res High Educ, 14, 1175, 10.1108/JARHE-04-2021-0135 Kline, 2015 Liñán, 2009, Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions, Entrep Theory Pract, 33, 593, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x Lin, 2009, Understanding online social support and its antecedents: a socio-cognitive model, Soc Sci J, 46, 724, 10.1016/j.soscij.2009.03.004 Ullah, 2022, Technology enabling the new normal: how students respond to classes, Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn, 23, 35 Zia, 2020, Exploring factors influencing online classes due to social distancing in COVID-19 pandemic: a business students’ perspective, Int J Inf Learn Technol, 37, 197, 10.1108/IJILT-05-2020-0089 Lee, 2019, Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning, Sustainability, 11, 10.3390/su11040985 Isaac, 2018, Integrating user satisfaction and performance impact with technology acceptance model (TAM) to examine the internet usage within organizations in Yemen, Asian J. Inf. Technol., 17, 60 Urbach, 2010, Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares, J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol.(JITTA), 11, 2 Ringle, 2010, Finite mixture partial least squares analysis: Methodology and numerical examples, 195 Podsakoff, 2003, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, J Appl Psychol, 88, 879, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Kock, 2012, Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations, J Assoc Inf Syst, 13, 546 Hair, 2019, When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, Eur Bus Rev, 31, 2, 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 Henseler, 2015, A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, J Acad Mark Sci, 43, 115, 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 Hair, 2017, An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research, Ind Manag Data Syst, 117, 442, 10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130 Alshurafat, 2021, Factors affecting online accounting education during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrated perspective of social capital theory, the theory of reasoned action and the technology acceptance model, Educ Inf Technol, 26, 6995, 10.1007/s10639-021-10550-y Huang, 2020, Chinese students’ intentions to use the internet-based technology for learning, Educ Technol Res Dev, 68, 575, 10.1007/s11423-019-09695-y Kumar, 2020, Behavioral intention to use mobile learning: evaluating the role of self-efficacy, subjective norm, and WhatsApp use habit, IEEE Access, 8, 208058, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037925 Won, 2020, The effect of consumer motivations on purchase intention of online fashion-sharing platform, J Asian Financ Econ Bus, 7, 197, 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.197 Novela, 2020, The effects of hedonic and utilitarian motivation toward online purchase intention with attitude as intervening variable Yoo, 2013, The effect of the attitude towards e-learning: the employees’ intention to use e-learning in the workplace, Int J E Learn, 12, 425 Dewaele, 2022, The interplay between learner-internal variables and levels of anxiety and enjoyment among Spanish EFL learners, 217 Setiyawan, 2022, Factors affecting user acceptance of e-learning implementation in the context of higher education: a case study of health science, J Educ Online, 19 Chahal, 2022, Exploring the acceptance for e-learning among higher education students in India: combining technology acceptance model with external variables, J Comput High Educ, 1 Raman, 2022, Investigating the influence of intrinsic motivation on behavioral intention and actual use of technology in moodle platforms, Int J Instr, 15, 1003 Prasetyo, 2021, Determining factors affecting the acceptance of medical education learning platforms during the covid-19 pandemic in the Philippines: UTAUT2 approach, Healthcare, 9, 780, 10.3390/healthcare9070780 Hermita, 2019, The determinants and impact of system usage and satisfaction on e-learning success and faculty-student interaction in indonesian private universities, Malays J Consum Fam Econ, 23, 85 Cheok, 2015, Predictors of e-learning satisfaction in teaching and learning for school teachers: a literature review, Int J Instr, 8, 75 Zamzuri, 2012, The role of cognitive styles in influencing the users’ satisfaction on e-learning system, Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 67, 427, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.347 Al-Adwan, 2021, Developing a holistic success model for sustainable e-learning: a structural equation modeling approach, Sustainability, 13, 9453, 10.3390/su13169453 Eom, 2012, The role of information technology in e-learning systems success, Hum Syst Manag, 31, 147, 10.3233/HSM-2012-0767 Waheed, 2016, What role does knowledge quality play in online students’ satisfaction, learning and loyalty? an empirical investigation in an e-learning context, J Comput Assist Learn, 32, 561, 10.1111/jcal.12153 Ching, 2021, Effect of student satisfaction on e-learning quality and learning outcome among Malaysian undergraduate nursing students, J Educ Online, 18 Abuhassna, 2020, Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction, Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 17, 1, 10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z Limna, 2022, The relationship between twenty-first-century learning model (4Cs), student satisfaction and student performance-effectiveness, Int J Behav Anal, 2, 1 Alqurashi, 2016, Self-efficacy in online learning environments: a literature review, Contemp Issues Educ Res (CIER), 9, 45, 10.19030/cier.v9i1.9549 Wei, 2020, Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter?, Distance Educ, 41, 48, 10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768 Castillo-Merino, 2014, An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning, Comput Human Behav, 30, 476, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.020 Francescucci, 2019, Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: the impact on student performance and engagement outcomes, J Mark Educ, 41, 60, 10.1177/0273475318818864 Steffens, 2011, Didactics and self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: a contradiction?, Self-Regul Learn Technol Enhanc Learn Environ Eur Perspect, 33