Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in the community structure of yeasts associated with decayingOpuntia cactus

Barker JSF, Toll GL, East PD, Miranda M, Phaff HJ (1983) Heterogeneity of the yeast flora in the breeding sites of cactophilicDrosophila. Can J Microbiol 29:6–14 Barker JSF, East PD, Phaff HJ, Miranda M (1984) The ecology of the yeast flora in necroticOpuntia cacti and of associatedDrosophila in Australia. Microb Ecol 10:379–399 Barker JSF, East PD, Weir BS (1986) Temporal and microgeographic variation in allozyme frequencies in a natural population ofDrosophila buzzatii. Genetics 112:577–611 Barker JSF, Vacek DC, East PD, Starmer WT (1986) Allozyme genotypes ofDrosophila buzzatii: feeding and oviposition preferences for microbial species, and habitat selection. Aust J Biol Sci 39:47–58 Fogleman JC, Starmer WT (1985) Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. III.Stenocereus thurberi. Microb Ecol 11:165–173 Gilbert DG (1980) Dispersal of yeasts and bacteria byDrosophila in a temperate forest. Oecologia 46:135–137 Hedrick PW, Ginevan ME, Ewing EP (1976) Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:1–32 Heed WB (1981) Central and marginal populations revisited. Drosophila Inf Serv 56:60–61 Karlin S (1982) Classifications of selection-migration structures and conditions for a protected polymorphism. Evol Biol 14:61–204 McDonald JF, Ayala FJ (1974) Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity. Nature 250:572–574 Mulley JC, James JW, Barker JSF (1979) Allozyme genotype-environment relationships in natural populations ofDrosophila buzzatii. Biochem Genet 17:105–126 Murray ND (1982) Ecology and evolution of theOpuntia-Cactoblastis ecosystem in Australia. In: Barker JSF, Starmer WT (eds) Ecological genetics and evolution. The cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia, pp 17–30 Powell JR (1971) Genetic polymorphism in varied environments. Science 174:1035–1036 Powell JR, Wistrand H (1978) The effect of heterogeneous environments and a competitor on genetic variation inDrosophila. Am Nat 112:935–947 Rockwood-Sluss ES, Johnston JS, Heed WB (1973) Allozyme genotype-environment relationships. I. Variation in natural populations ofDrosophila pachea. Genetics 73:135–146 Starmer WT (1982) Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. I.Stenocereus gummosus. Microb Ecol 8:71–81 Starmer WT, Heed WB (1977) The infection ofDrosophila cultures by species of the genusPrototheca. Drosophila Inf Serv 52:12 Starmer WT, Phaff HJ, Miranda M, Miller MW, Heed WB (1982) The yeast flora associated with the decaying stems of columnar cacti andDrosophila in North America. Evol Biol 14:269–295 Starmer WT, Phaff HJ (1983) Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. II.Opuntia species. Microb Ecol 9:247–259 Taylor CE, Powell JR (1977) Microgeographic differentiation of chromosomal and enzyme polymorphisms inDrosophila persimilis. Genetics 85:681–695 Vacek DC (1982) Interactions between microorganisms and cactophilicDrosophila in Australia. In: Barker JSF, Starmer WT (eds) Ecological genetics and evolution. The cactus-yeastDrosophila model system. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia, pp 175–190 Vacek DC, East PD, Barker JSF, Soliman MH (1985) Feeding and oviposition preferences ofDrosophila buzzatii for microbial species isolated from its natural environment. Biol J Linnean Soc (London) 24:175–187 Van der Walt JP (1970) Criteria and methods used in classification. In: Lodder J (ed) The yeasts: a taxonomic study. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 34–113 Yamazaki T, Kusakabe S, Tachida H, Ichinose M, Yoshimaru H, Matsuo Y, Mukai T (1983) Reexamination of diversifying selection of polymorphic allozyme genes by using population cages inDrosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:5789–5792