Analysis of slug interference tests conducted in an artificial fracture

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 29 - Trang 895-907 - 2021
Yunfeng Dai1,2, Yanrong Zhao3, Jin Lin1,2, Jiangbo Han1,2, Xiaomin Sun1,2, Wei Li1,2, Jiufu Liu1,2
1State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, China
2Groundwater Research Center, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, China
3School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

Tóm tắt

A laboratory analogue experiment platform with an artificial fracture was built to analyze the effect of slug interference tests on the evaluation of the hydraulic properties of fractured rocks. The response of an aquifer to a slug source well was analyzed using type-curve comparisons under the condition of different radial constant-water-head boundaries. The injecting-water, releasing-water, and pneumatic laboratory experiments of the slug interference tests were conducted in an artificial fracture. The relationship between the critical distance of the radial constant-water-head boundary and the dimensionless storage coefficient approximately followed a power function. The empirical formula provides an intuitive and effective reference criterion for considering the influence of the radial constant-water-head boundaries during field slug interference tests. When the radial constant-water-head boundary distances are less than the critical values, the boundary leads to an obvious increase in the recovery rate during the late response period, and the response peaks of the aquifer shift to an earlier time in the low-storage fractured rocks. The monitoring and analysis of the response in fractured rocks can improve the accuracy of the transmissivity and storage coefficient estimations, particularly when the slug interference tests are affected by the radial constant-water-head boundaries.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Audouin O, Bodin J (2008) Cross-borehole slug test analysis in a fractured limestone aquifer. J Hydrol 348(3–4):510–523 Beckie R, Harvey CF (2002) What does a slug test measure: an investigation of instrument response and the effects of heterogeneity. Water Resour Res 38(12):1290 Brauchler R, Hu R, Vogt T, Al-Halbouni D, Heinrichs T, Ptak T, Sauter M (2010) Cross-well slug interference tests: an effective characterization method for resolving aquifer heterogeneity. J Hydrol 384(1–2):33–45 Butler JJ (2019) The design, performance, and analysis of slug tests. CRC, Boca Raton Butler JJ, McElwee CD, Liu W (1996) Improving the quality of parameter estimates obtained from slug tests. Groundwater 34(3):480–490 Butler JJ, Zhan X (2004) Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers. Water Resour Res 40:W12402 Cooper HH, Bredehoeft JD, Papadopulos IS (1967) Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resour Res 3(1):263–269 Dai YF, Zhou ZF, Zhao YR, Cui ZT (2015) Evaluation of the effects of the radial constant-head boundary in slug tests. Hydrogeol J 23(4):807–818 Elmhirst LM, Novakowski KS (2012) The analysis of pulse interference tests conducted in a fractured rock aquifer bounded by a moving free surface. Adv Water Resour 35:20–29 Guiltinan E, Becker MW (2015) Measuring well hydraulic connectivity in fractured bedrock using periodic slug tests. J Hydrol 521:100–107 Guyonnet D, Mishra S, McCord J (1993) Evaluating the volume of porous medium investigated during slug tests. Ground Water 31(4):627–633 Hyder Z, Butler JJ, McElwee CD, Liu W (1994) Slug tests in partially penetrating wells. Water Resour Res 30(11):2945–2957 Karasaki K, Long JCS, Witherspoon PA (1988) Analytical models of slug tests. Water Resour Res 24(1):115–126 Malama B, Kuhlman KL, Brauchler R, Bayer P (2016) Modeling cross-hole slug tests in an unconfined aquifer. J Hydrol 540:784–796 McElwee CD, Bohling GC, Butler JJ (1995a) Sensitivity analysis of slug tests, part 1: the slugged well. J Hydrol 164:53–67 McElwee CD, Butler JJ, Bohling GC, Liu W (1995b) Sensitivity analysis of slug tests: part 2, observation wells. J Hydrol 164:69–87 Medici G, West LJ, Banwart SA (2019a) Groundwater flow velocities in a fractured carbonate aquifer-type: implications for contaminant transport. J Contam Hydrol 222:1–16 Medici G, West LJ, Chapman PJ, Banwart SA (2019b) Prediction of contaminant transport in fractured carbonate aquifer types: a case study of the Permian Magnesian Limestone Group (NE England, UK). Environ Sci Poll Res Int 26(24):24863–24884 Novakowski KS (1989) Analysis of pulse interference tests. Water Resour Res 25(11):2377–2387 Novakowski KS (1990) Analysis of aquifer tests conducted in fractured rock: a review of the physical background and the design of a computer program for generating type curves. Ground Water 28(1):99–107 Papadopulos SS, Bredehoeft JD, Cooper HH (1973) On the analysis of ‘slug test’ data. Water Resour Res 9(4):1087–1089 Paradis D, Lefebvre R (2013) Single-well interference slug tests to assess the vertical hydraulic conductivity of unconsolidated aquifers. J Hydrol 478:102–118 Paradis D, Gloaguen E, Lefebvre R, Giroux B (2016) A field proof-of-concept of tomographic slug tests in an anisotropic littoral aquifer. J Hydrol 536:61–73 Ren S, Gragg S, Zhang Y, Carr BJ, Yao G (2018) Borehole characterization of hydraulic properties and groundwater flow in a crystalline fractured aquifer of a headwater mountain watershed, Laramie Range, Wyoming. J Hydrol 561:780–795 Sageev A (1986) Slug test analysis. Water Resour Res 22(8):1323–1333 Shapiro A (1989) Interpretation of oscillatory water levels in observation wells during aquifer tests in fractured rock. Water Resour Res 25(10):2129–2137 Slack TZ, Murdoch LC, Germanovich LN, Hisz DB (2013) Reverse water-level change during interference slug tests in fractured rock. Water Resour Res 49(3):1552–1567 Spane FA (1996) Applicability of slug interference tests for hydraulic characterization of unconfined aquifers: 1, analytical assessment. Ground Water 34(1):66–74 Spane FA, Thorne PD, Swanson LC (1996) Applicability of slug interference tests for hydraulic characterization of unconfined aquifers: 2, field test examples. Ground Water 34(5):925–933 Stephenson KM, Novakowski KS (2006) The analysis of pulse interference tests conducted in a fractured rock aquifer bounded by a constant free surface. J Hydrol 319(1–4):109–122 Wang X, Jourde H, Aliouache M, Massonnat G (2018) Characterization of horizontal transmissivity anisotropy using cross-hole slug tests. J Hydrol 564:89–98 Zhao YR (2013) Theories and methods research of determining rock mass permeability parameters by slug test. Hohai University, Hohai, China