Analysis of Prolapse in Cardiovascular Stents: A Constitutive Equation for Vascular Tissue and Finite-Element Modelling

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering - Tập 125 Số 5 - Trang 692-699 - 2003
Peter M. Prendergast1, Caitríona Lally1, Sally Daly1, Alex Reid1, T. C. Lee2, D. F. Quinn3, Finbar Dolan3
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
2Department of Anatomy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
3Medtronic AVE, Parkmore Industrial Estate, Galway, Ireland

Tóm tắt

The effectiveness of a cardiovascular stent depends on many factors, such as its ability to sustain the compression applied by the vessel wall, minimal longitudinal contraction when it is expanded, and its ability to flex when navigating tortuous blood vessels. The long-term reaction of the tissue to the stent is also device dependant; in particular some designs provoke in-stent restenosis (i.e., regrowth of the occlusion around the stent). The mechanism of restenosis is thought to involve injury or damage to the vessel wall due to the high stresses generated around the stent when it expands. Because of this, the deflection of the tissue between the struts of the stent (called prolapse or “draping”) has been used as a measure of the potential of a stent to cause restenosis. In this paper, uniaxial and biaxial experiments on human femoral artery and porcine aortic vascular tissue are used to develop a hyperelastic constitutive model of vascular tissue suitable for implementation in finite-element analysis. To analyze prolapse, four stent designs (BeStent 2, Medtronic AVE; NIROYAL, Boston Scientific; VELOCITY, Cordis; TETRA, Guidant) were expanded in vitro to determine their repeating-unit dimensions. This geometric data was used to generate a finite element model of the vascular tissue supported within a repeating-unit of the stent. Under a pressure of 450 mm Hg (representing the radial compression of the vessel wall), maximum radial deflection of 0.253 mm, 0.279 mm, 0.348 mm and 0.48 mm were calculated for each of the four stents. Stresses in the vascular wall were highest for the VELOCITY stent. The method is proposed as a way to compare stents relative to their potential for restenosis and as a basis for a biomechanical design of a stent repeating-unit that would minimize restenosis.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Sigwart, U., Puel, J., Mirkovitch, V., Joffre, F., and Kappenberger, L., 1987, “Intravascular Stents to Prevent Occlusion and Restenosis After Transluminal Angioplasty,” N. Engl. J. Med., 316, pp. 701–707.

Duerg, T., Pelton, A., and Sto¨ckel, D., 1999, “An Overview of Nitinol for Medical Applications,” Materials Science and Engineering, A273–275, pp. 149–160.

Schwartz, R. S. , 1998, “Pathophysiology of Restenosis: Interaction of Thrombosis, Hyperplasic, and/or Remodelling,” Am. J. Cardiol., 81, pp. 14E–17E14E–17E.

Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., Dirchinger, J., Pache, J., Ulm, K., Schu¨hlen, H., Seyfarth, M., Schmitt, C., Blasini, R., Neumann, F.-J., and Scho¨mig, A., 2001, “Restenosis After Coronary Placement of Various Stent Types,” Am. J. Cardiol., 87, pp. 34–39.

Edelman, E. R., and Rogers, C., 1995, “Endovascular Stent Design Dictates Experimental Restenosis and Thrombosis,” Circulation, 91, pp. 2995–3001.

Dumoulin, C., and Cochelin, B., 2000, “Mechanical Behavior Modelling of Balloon-Expandable Stents,” J. Biomech., 33, pp. 1461–1470.

Whitcher, F. D. , 1997, “Simulation of In Vivo Loading Conditions of Nitinol Vascular Stent Structures,” Computers and Structures, 64, pp. 1005–1011.

Veress, A. I., Vince, D. G., Anderson, P. M., Cornhill, J. F., Herderick, E. E., Killingensmith, J. D., Kuban, B. D., and Thomas, J. D., 2000, “Vascular Mechanics of the Coronary Artery,” Z. Kardiol., 89(Suppl. 2), pp. 92–100.

Rogers, C., Tseng, D. Y., Squire, J. C., and Edelman, E. R., 1999, “Balloon-Artery Interactions During Stent Placement—A Finite-Element Analysis Approach to Pressure, Compliance, and Stent Design as Contributors to Vascular Injury,” Circ. Res., 84, pp. 378–383.

Hayashi, K., and Imai, Y., 1997, “Tensile Property of Atheromatous Plaque and an Analysis of Stress in the Artherosclerotic Wall,” J. Biomech., 30, pp. 573–579.

Green, A. E., and Zerna, W., 1968, Theoretical Elasticity, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Carew, T. E., Vaishnav, R. N., and Patel, D. J., 1968, “Compressibility of the Vascular Wall,” Circ. Res., 27, pp. 105–119.

Mooney, M. , 1940, “A Theory of Large Elastic Deformation,” J. Appl. Phys., 11, pp. 582–592.

Sacks, M. S. , 2000, “Biaxial Mechanical Evaluation of Biological Materials,” Journal of Elasticity, 61, pp. 199–246.

Ponde, C. K., Aroney, C. N., McEniery, P. T., and Bett, J. H. N., 1997, “Plaque Prolapse Between the Struts of the Intracoronary Palmaz-Schantz Stent,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 40, pp. 353–357.

Hong, M.-K., Park, S.-W., Lee, C. W., Kang, D.-K., Song, J.-J., and Park, A.-J., 2000, “Long-Term Outcomes of Minor Plaque Prolapsed Within Stents Documented With Intravascular Untrasound,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 51, pp. 22–26.

Jang, I.-K., Tearney, G., and Bouma, B., 2001, “Visualization of Tissue Prolapse Between Coronary Stent Struts by Optical Coherence Tomography,” Comparison With Intravascular Untrasound. Circulation, 104, p. 27542754.

Treloar, L. R. G. , 1943, “The Elasticity of a Network of Long-Chain Molecules,” Transactions of the Faraday Society, 39, pp. 241–246.

Truesdell, C. A. , 1952, “The Mechanical Foundations of Elasticity and Fluid Dynamics,” Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 1, pp. 173–182.

Holzapfel, G. A., Gasser, T. C., and Ogden, R. W., 2000, “A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models,” Journal of Elasticity, 61, pp. 1–48.

Burton, A. C. , 1962, “Physical Principles of Circulatory Phenomena: The Physical Equilibria of the Heart and Blood Vessels,” Handbook of Physiology, 1(Section 2), pp. 85–106, American Physiological Society, Washington.

Beyar, R., and Serruys, P., 1999, The BeStent, In: Handbook of Coronary Stents, P. W. Serruys and M. J. B. Kutryk (Eds.), 1998 second edition, Martin Dunitz, London, p. 159.

Edelman, E. R., and Rogers, C., 1998, “Pathobiologic Responses to Stenting,” Am. J. Cardiol., 81(7A), pp. 4E–6E4E–6E.

Fung, Y. C., Biomechanics. Mechanical Behavior of Living Tissues, Springer, New York, NY.

Holzapfel, G., 2000, In: Mechanics in Biology, eds. J. Casey and G. Bao, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 157–169.

Truesdell, C. A. , 1952, “The Mechanical Foundations of Elasticity and Fluid Dynamics,” Journal of Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 1, p. 182182.

Vorp, D. A., and Wang, D. H.-J., 2000, “Use of Finite Elasticity in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research,” In: Mechanics in Biology (eds. J. Casey and G. Bao), American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, pp. 157–169.

Sacks, M. S., and Chuong, C., 1998, “Orthotropic Mechanical Properties of Chemically Treated Bovine Pericardium,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 26, pp. 892–902.

Jemiolo, S., and Telega, J. J., 2001, “Transversely Isotropic Materials Undergoing Large Deformations and Application to Modelling of Soft Tissues,” Mech. Res. Commun., 28, pp. 397–404.

Hoffmann, R., Mintz, G. S., Dussaillant, G. R., Popma, J. J., Pichard, A. D., Salter, L. F., Kent, K. M., Griffin, J., and Leon, M. B., 1996, “Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent Restenosis,” Circulation, 94, pp. 1247–1254.

Messenger, J. C., Chen, S. Y. J., Carroll, J. D., Burchenal, J. E. B., Kioussopoulos, K., and Groves, B. M., 2000, “3-D Coronary Reconstruction From Routine Single-Plane Coronary Angiograms: Clinical Validation and Quantitative Analysis of the Right Coronary Artery in 100 Patients,” Int. J. Card. Imaging, 16, pp. 413–427.

Lally, C., Prendergast, P. J., Lennon, A. B., Quinn, D., and Dolan, F., 2002, “Finite-Element Analysis of Tissue Prolapse Within Intravascular Stents Calculated Using a Single Repeating Unit of a Stent and a Full 3-D Model of a Stent,” Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Society of Biomechanics, Wroclaw, Poland. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 4(Suppl. 1), pp. 537–538.