Analysis and on-line compensation of gravity disturbance in a high-precision inertial navigation system
Tóm tắt
Zero velocity update technology (ZUPT) has frequently been used as a tool to reduce divergence when the inertial navigation system (INS) is working in pure inertial mode. In general, the normal gravity model is adopted to calculate the gravity vector, and the effect of gravity disturbance is neglected. We present a new point of view to explain the influence of gravity disturbance on INS and point out that gravity disturbance is one of the most significant error sources of the high-precision INS. Two real-time gravity disturbance compensation methods are proposed. An about 110-km-long vehicle test has been conducted in mountainous terrain with a drastic change of gravity disturbance. The test results proved the correctness of the new explanation and the feasibility of the two on-line compensation algorithms for land vehicles. With gravity disturbance compensation in conjunction with ZUPTs, the total horizontal error at the end of the test was reduced from 8.93 to 3.75 m, and the elevation error was reduced from 1.63 to 0.80 m.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barthelmes F (2013). Definition of functionals of the geopotential and their calculation from spherical harmonic models. Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam. http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/str-0902-revised.pdf
Förste C et al. (2014) EIGEN-6C4 the latest combined global gravity field model Including GOCE date up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse. In: 5th GOCE user workshop, France, Paris, July, pp 101–120
Gongmin Y, Yongyuan Q, Bo Y (2006) On error compensation technology for vehicular dead reckoning(DR) system. J Northwestern Polytech Univ 24(2):26–30
Groves P (2013) Principles of GNSS, inertial, and multi-sensor integrated navigation systems, 2nd edin
Hsu D, Brockstein A (2011) Gravity vector compensation system. United States Patent, US 6,249,745 B1
Huddle JR (1988) Trends in inertial systems technology for high accuracy AUV navigation. In: Proceedings of the 1998 workshop on autonomous underwater vehicles, USA, Massachusetts, Cambridge, August, pp 63–73
Ishibashi S, Tsukioka S, Sawa S (2007) The Rotation control system to improve the accuracy of an inertial navigation system installed in an autonomous underwater vehicle. In: 2007 Symposium on underwater technology and workshop on scientific use of submarine cables and related technologies, Japan, Tokyo, April, pp 495–498
Liang A, Kleinbub D (1974) Drift compensation and acceleration resolution for a rotating platform IMU. AIAA J Spacecr 11(8):547–548
Titterton DH, Weston JL (2014) Strapdown inertial navigation technology, 2nd edn. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (USA) and Institution of Electrical Engineers (UK), London, pp 342–344
Tucker T, Levison E (2000) The AN/WSN-7B marine gyrocompass/navigator. In: Proceedings of ION NTM 2000, Institute of Navigation, Anaheim, CA, January 26–28, pp 348–357
Vanderwerf K (1998) Inertial navigation with gravity deflection compensation. United States Patent, US 5,774,832 A
Wei G, Yueyang B, Xin Z, Qian L, Fei Y (2011) Rapid fine strapdown INS alignment method under marine mooring condition. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 7(4):2887–2896
Wen Y, Jianli L, Jiancheng F, Xuezhong Y (2018) EGP-CDKF for performance improvement of the SINS/GNSS integrated system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(4):3601–3609
Wong R V C, Schwarz K P (1988) Development and field testing of a RLG strapdown inertial survey system. In: IEEE position location and navigation symposium, USA, Orlando, November, pp 480–487
Xiaoji N, Qijin C, Jian K, Jingnan L (2016) Return of inertial surveying-trend of illusion? In: 2016 IEEE/ION position, location and navigation symposium, USA, Savannah, May, pp 165–169
Xu Q, Li X, Chan C-Y (2018) Enhancing localization accuracy of MEMS-INS/GPS in-vehicle sensors integration during GPS outages. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 67(8):1966–1978