Phương pháp Phân tích Các Tòa nhà Cao tầng Không Đều Chịu Tải trọng Động đất

Estekanchi HE, Valamanesh V, Vafai A (2007) Application of Endurance Time method in linear seismic analysis. Eng Struct 29:2551–2562 Pannirselvam N, Sreelekshmi M (2022) Study on Irregular Tall RC Structure and Composite Structure by Pushover Analysis. Advances in Construction Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 2022. 191 Lee D-G, Kim H-S, Chun MH (2002) Efficient seismic analysis of high-rise building structures with the effects of floor slabs. Eng Struct 24:613–623 Kappos AJ, Stefanidou S (2010) A deformation-based seismic design method for 3D R/C irregular buildings using inelastic dynamic analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 8:875–895 Naveen SE, Abraham NM, Kumari ASD (2019) Analysis of irregular structures under earthquake loads. Struct Integ Procedia 14:806–819 Stefano MD, Marino EM, Rossi PP (2006) Effect of soverstrength on the seismic behaviour of multi-storey regularly asymmetric buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4:23–42 Soni DP, Mistry BB (2006) Qualitative review of seismic response of vertically irregular building frames. ISET J Earthq Technol 43(4):806–819 Mazza F, Mazza M, Vulcano A (2015) Displacement-based seismic design of hysteretic damped braces for retrofitting in-elevation irregular r.c. framed structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:115–124 Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Casagrande L (2016) Seismic analysis of high-rise mega-braced frame-core buildings. Eng Struct 115:1–17 Magliulo G, Maddaloni G, Cosenza E (2012) Extension of N2 method to plan irregular buildings considering accidental eccentricity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 43:69–84 Tezcan SS, Alhan C (2001) Parametric analysis of irregular structures under seismic loading according to the new Turkish Earthquake Code. Eng Struct 23:600–609 Seo J, Dueñas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (2012) Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events. Eng Struct 45:585–597 Anuse B, Shinde K (2021) Analysis of RC Irregular Building According to Different Seismic Design Codes. Trends in Civil Engineering and Challenges for Sustainability. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 99 Sneha KK, Durgaprasad J (2022) An Investigation of Coefficient of Torsional Irregularity for Irregular Buildings in Plan. Sustainability Trends and Challenges in Civil Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 162 Ardila L, Reyes JC, Moreno MP (2022) Evaluation of Torsional Parameters in Seismic Code Provisions for Multi-story Unsymmetric-Plan Buildings. Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures IV. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, 50 Valentina B, Alberto B, De Raffaele R, De Flavia L, Enrico S (2022) A simplified model for seismic safety assessment of reinforced concrete buildings: framework and application to a 3-storey plan-irregular moment resisting frame. Eng Struct 250:113348 Zahid M, Miraz M, Warsi MFS, Pal S (2022) Seismic Analysis of Vertically Regular and Irregular Buildings with Shear Walls and RCC X-Bracing System. Advances in Construction Materials and Sustainable Environment. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 196 DASSE DESIGN Inc (2007) Cost advantages of buckling restrained braced frame buildings. Report no. 06B260. San Francisco, California: DASSE DESIGN Inc. Albanesi T, Nuti C, Vanzi I (2000) A simplified procedure to assess the seismic response of non-linear structures. Earthq Spectra 16(4):715–734 Isakovic T, Fischinger M, Kante P (2002) Bridges: when is single mode seismic analysis adequate? Struct Build 156(SB2):165–173 Chopra AK, Goel RK (2000) Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF systems. J Struct Eng 126(4):482–490 Liu MW, Kao YC, Jan TS (2002) A new pushover analysis procedure for high-rise buildings. In The 25th Conference on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Hu-Wei, Taiwan: ROC Jan TS, Liu MW, Kao YC (2002) Pushover analysis and seismic demands of structures to near-fault earthquakes. in NSC 90–2211E- 035–014, . Taiwan: ROC Jan TS, Liu MW, Kao YC (2004) An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings. Eng Struct 26:117–128 Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 31(3):561–582 Papanikolaou VK, Elnashai AS (2005) Evaluation of Conventional and Adaptive Pushover Analysis I: Methodology. J Earthquake Eng 9(6):923–941 Fajfar P (1999) Capacity Spectrum Method based on Inelastic Demand Spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 28:979–993 Makarios TK, Bakalis AP (2022) Seismic Enforced Displacement-Based Pushover Analysis on Irregular In-Plan R/C Multi-storey Buildings. Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures IV. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering. 50. FEMA356, Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, USA., 2000. Momtahen A, Banan M-R, Banan M-R (2008) Evaluation of FEMA440 Equivalent Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis for Irregular Steel Moment Resisting Frames. in The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2008. Beijing, China Sukrawa M (2015) Earthquake response of RC infilled frame with wall openings in low-rise hotel buildings. Procedia Eng 125:933–939 Rajmani A, Guha P (2015) Analysis of wind & earthquake load for different shapes of high rise building. Int J Civil Eng Tech (IJCIET) 6(2):38–45 Taranath BS (2010) Reinforced Concrete Design of Tall Buildings. Taylor & Francis Group. 907. Falconer DW, Beedle LS (1984) Earthquake resistance of high-rise systems classification of tall building systems. Fritz Engineering Laboratory Lehigh University Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015. p. 93 Sadraddin H (2015) Fragility Assessment of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings Fragility Assessment of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings, In Department of Civil and Construction Engineering. Western Michigan University: Western Michigan University. p. 147 GmbH E (2012) Available from: http://www.emporis.com. (Assessed in 2012). Kaur N, Matsagar VA, Nagpal AK (2012) Earthquake Response of Mid-rise to High-rise Buildings with Friction Dampers. Int J High-Rise Build 1(4):311–332 Esteghamati MZ, Banazadeh M, Huang Q (2017) The effect of design drift limit on the seismic performance of RC dual high-rise buildings. Struct Design Tall Spec Buildings 27(8):1–16 Gabel J, Carver M, Gerometta M (2016) 1 Ji J, Elnashai AS, Kuchma DA (2007) Seismic Fragility Assessment for Reinforced Concrete High-Rise Buildings. Mid-America Earthquake Center: illinois Sciences NIoB (2004) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model: HAZUS-MR4 Technical manual. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency Faisal A, Majid TA, Hatzigeorgiou GD (2013) Investigation of story ductility demands of inelastic concrete frames subjected to repeated earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 44:42–53 Chopra AK, Goel RK (2003) A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure to Estimate Seismic Demands for Unsymmetric-Plan Buildings: Theory and Preliminary Evaluation in Report on Research Conducted under Grant No. CMS-0336085 from the National Science Foundation. University of California Earthquake Engineering Research Center Raju KR, Ansu M, Iyer NR (2013) A methodology of design for seismic performance enhancement of buildings using viscous fluid dampers. Struct Control Health Monit 21(3):342–355 Oyguc R, Toros C, Abdelnaby AE (2018) Seismic behavior of irregular reinforced-concrete structures under multiple earthquake excitations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 104:15–32 Koçak A, Zengin B, Kadioğlu F (2015) Performance assessment of irregular RC buildings with shear walls after Earthquake. Eng Fail Mech 55:157–168 Dya AFC, Oretta AWC (2015) Seismic vulnerability assessment of soft story irregular buildings using pushover analysis. Procedia Eng 125:925–932 Agarwal P, Shrikhande M (2006) Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. 11 ed, Patparganj Industrial Estate, Delhi-110092: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited. p. 634 Duggal SK (2007) Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. 8 ed., YMCA Library Building, 1 Jai singh Road, New Delhi 110001, India: Oxford University Press. P-448 Chintanapakdee C, Chopra AK (2004) Seismic Response of Vertically Irregular Frames: Response History and Modal Pushover Analyses. J Struct Eng 130(8):1177–1185 Gottala A, Kishore KSN, Yajdhani S (2015) Comparative study of static and dynamic seismic analysis of a multistoried building. Int J Sci Tech Eng 2(1):173–183 Alghuff AY, Shihada SM, Tayeh BA (2019) Comparative study of static and response spectrum methods for seismic analysis of regular RC buildings. J Appl Sci 19(5):495–503 Kakpure GG, Mundhada AR (2016) Comparative study of static and dynamic seismic analysis of multistoried RCC buildings by ETAB. Int J Eng Res Appl 7(5):6–10 Beskos DE, Anagnostoulos SA (1997) Computer Analysis and Design of Earthquake Resistant Structures: A Handbook. Advances in earthquake engineering. Southampton, UK: Computational Mechanics Publications. P-936 Bagheri B, Firoozabad ES, Yahyaei M (2012) Comparative study of the static and dynamic analysis of multi-storey irregular building World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International. J Civ Environ Struct Construct Archit Eng 6:1045–1049 Valmundsson EV, Nau JM (1997) Seismic Response of Building Frames with Vertical Structural Irregularities. J Struct Eng 123(1):30–41 Ahmed MMM, Raheem SEA, Ahmed MM, Abdel-Shafy AGA (2016) Irregularity Effects on the Seismic Performance of L-shaped Multi-Story Buildings. J Eng Sci 44(5):513–536 Das S, Nau JM (2003) Seismic Design Aspects of Vertically Irregular Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Earthq Spectra 19(3):455–477 IS 1893 (Part 1):2016, in Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings (NEHRP), part 2: commentary. 1991, Building Seismic Safety Council: Washington, D.C. Oyguc RA, Boduroglu H (2012) Seismic Capacity Assessment Of Existing Irregular Reinforced Concrete (RC) Buildings By An Adaptive Three - Dimensional Pushover Procedure, in 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE) 2012: Lisbon, Portugal. p. 9 Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS (2001) Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Eng Struct 23(5):407–424 Tso WK, Moghadam AS (1998) Pushover procedure for seismic analysis of buildings. Prog Struct Mat Eng 1(3):337–344 Pinho R, Antoniou S, Pietra D (2006) A Displacement-Based Adaptive Pushover for Seismic Assessment of Steel and Reinforced Concrete Buildings, in 8th US National Conference in Earthquake Engineering. San Francisco, US. p. P-11 Chintanapakdee C, Nguyen AH, Hayashikawa T (2009) Assessment of modal pushover analysis procedure for seismic evaluation of buckling–restrained braced frames. Civ Struct Eng 2(3):174–186 Goel RK, Chopra AK (2005) Role of Higher-“Mode” Pushover Analyses in Seismic Analysis of Buildings. Earthq Spectra 21(4):1027–1041 Kashkooli NA, Banan MR (2013) Effect of frame irregularity on accuracy of modal equivalent nonlinear static seismic analysis. KSCE J Civ Eng 17(5):1064–1072 Mwafy AAM (2001) Seismic Performance of Code-designed RC Buildings, in Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of London. p. 374. Mitropoulou CC, Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M (2011) Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(10):1311–1331 Antoniou S, Rovithakis A, Pinho R (2002) Development and Verification of a fully Adaptive Pushover Procedure, in 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, A.H.C. Chan, Editor. Elsevier Science: London, UK p. P-10 Fajfar P, Gašperšič P (1996) The N2 Method for the Seismic Damage Analysis of RC Buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(1):31–46 Bahramirad A, Tehranizadeh M, Moshref A (2015) Equating incremental dynamic analysis with static nonlinear analysis at near-field excitation. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 14:465–476 Athanassiadou CJ (2008) Seismic performance of R/C plane frames irregular in elevation. Eng Struct 30(5):1250–1261 Varadharajan S (2014) Study of Irregular RC Buildings under Seismic effect, in Department of Civil Engineering. National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra. p. 404 Magliulo G, Maddaloni G, Cosenza E (2007) Comparison between non-linear dynamic analysis performed according to EC8 and elastic and non-linear static analyses. Eng Struct 29(11):2893–2900 Deepika N, Santosh KS (2016) Effect of Diaphragm Discontinuity in the Seismic Response of Multi-Storeyed Building. Int J Mag Eng Tech Manag Res 3(10):1456–1465 Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20(4–6):452–464 Kalkan E, Kunnath SK (2007) Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings. Eng Struct 29(3):305–316 Merter O, Ucar T (2013) A Comparative Study on Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis of RC Frame Structures. J Civ Eng Sci 2(3):155–162 Chintanapakdee C, Chopra AK (2003) Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 32(3):417–442 Elnashai AS (2001) Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Struct Eng Mech 12(1):51–69 Shooshtari A, Vejdani-Noghreiyan HR (2007) Seismic Behavior of Regular and Irregular Reinforced Concrete Buildings using Adaptive Pushover Procedure. Ninth Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pp 788–798 Kreslin M, Fajfar P (2011) The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 40(14):1571–1589 Freeman SA (1994) The capacity Spectrum Method for determining the demand displacement. In ACI 1994 Spring Convention Özmen G, Girgin K, Durgun Y (2014) Torsional irregularity in multi-story structures. Int J Adv Struct Eng (IJASE) 6:121–131 Irtem E, Hasgul U (2009) Investigation of effects of nonlinear static analysis procedures to performance evaluation on low-rise RC buildings. J Perform Constr Facil 23(6):456–466 Bohlouli Z, Poursha M (2016) Seismic evaluation of geometrically irregular steel moment resisting frames with setbacks considering their dynamic characteristics. Bull Earthq Eng 14:2757–2777 Chopra AK, Goel RK, Chintanapakdee C (2004) Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthq Spectra 20(3):757–778 Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C (2004) Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: vertically “regular” and irregular generic frames. Earthq Spectra 20(1):255–271 Varadharajan S, Sehgal VK, Saini B (2012) Review of different Structural irregularities in buildings. J Struct Eng 39(5):538–563 Wood SL (1992) Seismic Response of R/C Frames with Irregular Profiles. J Struct Eng 118(2):545–566 Cundari GA, Milani G (2013) Homogenized and heterogeneous limit analysis model for pushover analysis of ancient masonry walls with irregular texture. Int J Archit Heritage 7(3):303–338 Jiang Y, Li G, Yang D (2010) A modified approach of energy balance concept based multimode pushover analysis to estimate seismic demands for buildings. Eng Struct 32(5):1272–1283 Poursha M, Samarin ET (2015) The modified and extended upper-bound (UB) pushover method for the multi-mode pushover analysis of unsymmetric-plan tall buildings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 71:114–127 Isaković T, Fischinger M (2006) Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(1):95–114 Bosco M, Ghersi A, Marino EM (2009) On the evaluation of seismic response of structures by nonlinear static methods. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 38(13):1465–1482 Fajfar P, Fischinger M (1988) N2 - A Method for Non-linear Seismic Analysis of Regular Buildings. in Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan Giorgi P, Scotta R (2013) Validation and improvement of N1 method for pushover analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 55:140–147 Magliulo G, Maddaloni G, Petrone C (2014) Influence of earthquake direction on the seismic response of irregular plan RC frame buildings. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 13:243–256 Maddaloni G, Magliulo G, Martinelli E, Monti G, Petti L, Saetta A, Spacone E (2008) Non-linear Methods for Seismic Assessment of Exicting Structures: A Comparative Study on Italian RC Buildings, in The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China. p. P-8 Fajfar P (2000) A Nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3):573–592 Sakthi T, Vasugi V (2022) Non Linear Seismic Analysis of RC Framed Structure by Extended N2 Method. Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 175 Bracci JM, Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM (1997) Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. J Struct Eng 123(1):3–10 Ghosh SK, Dasgupta P (2015) Seismic Design Using Structural Dynamics Based on 2012 IBC/2015 IBC/ASCE 7–10. Structures and Codes Institute, USA Cancellara D, Angelis FD (2019) Dynamic assessment of base isolation systems for irregular in plan structures: Response spectrum analysis vs nonlinear analysis. Compos Struct 215:98–115 Banginwar RS, Vyawahare MR, Modani PO (2012) Effect of plans configurations on the seismic behaviour of the structure by response spectrum method. Int J Eng Res Appl (IJERA) 2(3):1439–1443 Mukundan H, Manivel S (2015) Effect of vertical stiffness irregularity on multi-storey shear wall-framed structures using response spectrum analysis. Int J Innovat Res Sci Eng Tech 4(3):1186–1198 Maison BF, Neuss CF, Kasai K (1983) The comparative performance of seismic response spectrum combination rules in building analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 11(5):623–647 López S, Pancardo D, De Stefano M, Ayala G, Alecci V (2022) Modified Modal Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular Highly Torsionally-Stiff Structures Under Seismic Demands. Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures IV. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering 50. Tremblay R, Poncet L (2005) Seismic Performance of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames in Multistory Buildings with Mass Irregularity. J Struct Eng 131(9):1363–1375 Hu K, Yang Y, Mu S, Qu G (2012) Study on High-rise Structure with Oblique Columns by ETABS, SAP2000, MIDAS/GEN and SATWE, in International Conference on Advances in Computational Modeling and Simulation. Z. lixiang, (Ed.) Elsevier. p. 474–480. Sayyed O, Kushwah SS, Rawat A (2017) Seismic analysis of vertical irregular rc building with stiffness and setback irregularities. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng (IOSR-JMCE) 14(1):40–45 Kappos AJ, Scott SG (1997) Seismic assessment of a R/C building with setbacks using nonlinear static and dynamic analysis procedures, in 6th SECED Conf. ‘Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century'. A.A. Balkema Publishers: Oxford, UK. p. 107–114 Sobaih, M., Hindi, A., Al-Noury, S. Non-linear Seismic Analysis of Setback Reinforced Concrete Frames. in Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 1988. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan. Özhendekci N, Polat Z (2008) Torsional Irregularity of Buildings, in The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2008: Beijing, China. p. P-8 Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 31(3):491–514 Ventura CE, Bebamzadeh A, Fairhurst M (2015) Efficient Performance- based Design using Parallel and Cloud computing. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 24(17):989–1001 Reyes JC, Kalkan E, Sierra A (2017) Fast Non-linear response history analysis, in 16th World Conference on Earthquake, 16WCEE 2017. Santiago Chile. p. P-11 Grant DN (2014) Assessment of Existing Structures Using Response History Analysis, In Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. p. P-17 Emori K, Schnobrich WC (1978) Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame-Wall Structures for Strong Motion Earthquakes, in Civil Engineering Studies SRS-457. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS at URBANA-CHAMPAIGN URBANA, ILLINOIS: University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois 61801. p. P-224 Vamvatsikos D (2011) Performing Incremental Dynamic Analysis in Parallel. Comput Struct 89(1):170–180 FU S, HE Z (2015) SHARED MEMORY PARALLEL COMPUTIN* PROCEDURES FOR NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SUPER HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS, in International Conference on Performance-based and Life-cycle Structural Engineering. Brisbane, QLD, Australia. p. 1629–1637 Smith B, Bjorstad P, Gropp W (1996) Domain Decomposition: Parallel Multilevel Methods for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations. Cambridge University, London, UK Sotelino ED (2003) Parallel processing techniques in structural engineering applications. J Struct Eng Mech 129(12):1698–1706 Amestoy PR, Duff IS, L'Excellent JY, Koster J (2001) MUMPS: a general purpose distributed memory sparse solver. In applied parallel computing. new paradigms for HPC in industry and academia. PARA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Li XS (2005) An overview of SuperLU: algorithms, implementation, and user interface. J ACM Trans Math Soft 31(3):302–325 Henon P, Ramet P, Roman J (2002) PaStiX: a high-performance parallel direct solver for sparse symmetric definite systems. Parallel Comput 28(2):301–321 Chambers J, Kelly T (2004) Nonlinear dynamic analysis – the only option for irregular structures, In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Gaidamour J, Hénon P (2008) A Parallel Direct/iterative solver based on a schur complement approach. in proceedings of the 11th ieee international conference on computational science and engineering. CSE'08 Yamazaki I, Li XS, Rouet FH, Uçar B (2013) On Partitioning and Reordering Problems in a Hierarchically Parallel Hybrid Linear Solver. in In Proceedings of the 27th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum (IPDPSW) Rajamanickam S, Boman EG, Heroux MA (2012) ShyLU: A Hybrid-Hybrid Solver for Multicore Platforms. In Proceedings of the 26th International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) Yang YS, Wang W, Lin JZ (2017) Computational Improvement of Hybrid Equations Solver on Nonlinear Response-History Analysis, in 2017 NZSEE Conference p. 8 Craig RR, Bampton MCC (1968) Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA J 6:1313 Hurty WC (1965) Dynamic analysis of structural systems using component modes. AIAA J 3:678 Dizon ABR (2015) A hybrid-parallel framework for the nonlinear seismic analysis of very tall buildings, In Depaertment of Civil Engineering. California Institute of Technology: Pasadena, California p. 212 Fang M, Wang J, Li H (2017) An adaptive numerical scheme based on the Craig-Bampton method for the dynamic analysis of tall buildings. Tall Special Build 27(1):e1410 Moehle JP, Alarcon LF (1986) Seismic analysis methods for irregular buildings. J Struct Eng 112(1):35–52 Jeong SH, Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS (2012) Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of code-compliant multi-story RC buildings. Eng Struct 34:527–537 Bertero VV (1980) Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments. Structural engineering and structural mechanics. In: Pister K (ed) Volume Honoring Edgar P Popov 1980. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, pp 188–237 Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Eng Struct Dyn 32(3):491–514 Nazri FM, Tan CG, Saruddin SNA (2018) Fragility Curves of Regular and Irregular Moment-Resisting Concrete and Steel Frames. Int J Civil Eng 16:917–927 Pirizadeh M, Shakib H (2013) Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of non-geometric vertically irregular steel buildings. J Constr Steel Res 82:88–98 Jalayer F, Cornell CA (2009) Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 38(8):951–972 Homaei F, Shakib H, Soltani M (2017) Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of vertically irregular steel building considering soil-structure interaction. Int J Civ Eng 15(4):611–625 Estekanchi HE, Vafai A, Sadeghazar M (2004) Endurance time method for seismic analysis and design of structures. Sci Iran 11:361–370 Estekanchi HE, Valamanesh V, Vafai A (2007) Application of endurance time method in linear seismic analysis. Eng Struct 29(10):2551–2562 Estekanchi HE, Vafai A, Basim MC (2011) Optimal damper placement in steel frames by the Endurance Time method. The structural design of tall and special buildings Struct. Design Tall Spec Build 20:612–630 Valamanesh V, Estekanchi HE (2011) Endurance time method for multi-component analysis of steel elastic moment frames. Scientia Iranica Trans A: Civ Eng 18(2):139–149 Ardebili MAH, Sattar S, Estekanchi HE (2014) Performance-based seismic assessment of steel frames using endurance time analysis. Eng Struct 69:216 Estekanchi HE, Riahi HT, Vafai A (2006) Endurance Time Method: A Dynamic Pushover Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of Structures., in First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology p. 1–9 Riahi HT, Estekanchi HE, Vafai A (2009) Estimates of average inelastic deformation demands for regular steel frames by the endurance time method. Scientia Iranica 16(5):388–402 Valamanesh V, Estekanchi HE (2010) Compatibility of the endurance time method with codifi ed seismic analysis approaches on three-dimensional analysis of steel frames. The structural design of tall and special buildings struct. Design Tall Spec. Build Valamanesh V, Estekanchi HE (2010) A study of endurance time method in the analysis of elastic moment frames under three-directional seismic loading. Asian J Civi Eng 11(5):543–562 Madarshahian R, Estekanchi H, Mahvashmohammadi A (2011) Estimating seismic demand parameters using the endurance time method. J Zhejiang University-Science a (Applied Physics & Engineering) 12(8):616–626 Razavi M (2007) Evaluation of endurance time method compared to spectral dynamic analysis method in seismic analysis of steel frames. Department of Civil Engineering Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran Mirzai A (2007) Usage of ET method in performance-based design of steel frames. Department of Civil Engineering Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran Valamanesh V, Estekanchi HE (2014) Nonlinear seismic assessment of steel moment frames under bidirectional loading via Endurance Time method. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS Struct. Design Tall Spec Build 23:442–462