Analysing and redesigning a remote sensing business process for rapid estimates of agriculture in Europe

Emerald - Tập 9 Số 1 - Trang 25-48 - 1996
AlexandreZenié1
1JRC Institute for Systems Engineering and Informatics, Italy

Tóm tắt

Describes the application of the Action Workflow approach to analyse a European project for monitoring agriculture from high resolution satellite images by using remote sensing techniques. The objective of this study was to improve and maintain co‐ordination between the organizations involved in the remote sensing process which evolved from a pilot phase and became operational. The study of the existing process was supported by the workflow product ActionWorkflow Analyst. Breakdowns and possible weaknesses identified in the previous process are reported. On the basis of a critical process review, the process is rationalized with an explicit visibility of customers, suppliers, organizational roles, activities and their communicative relationship. The re‐engineered process improves the service to customers in the European Commission (i.e. DG VI and Eurostat) and reduces transaction costs due to notably less customer/supplier interactions. Furthermore, there is a clear distinction between recurrent operations (done with more efficiency than in the actual process) and strategic services (with an added value to the management of ad hoc requests in the previous process). The newly designed business process has been prototyped using the workflow suite by Action Technologies. Evaluates the appropriateness of the ActionWorkflow approach and the systems ActionWorkflow Analyst, Builder and Manager for Lotus Notes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbott, K.R. and Sarin, S.K. (1994, “Experiences with workflow management: issues for the next generation”, in Furuta, R. and Neuwirth, C. (Eds), Proceedings of the Conference on Computersupported Cooperative Work, ACM, 22‐26 October, Chapel Hill, NC, pp. 113‐20.

Agostini, A., De Michelis, G., Grasso, M.A. and Patriarca, S. (1993, “Reengineering a business process with an innovative workflow management system: a case study”, in Kaplan, S. (Ed.), Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 154‐65.

Agostini, A., De Michelis, G., Patriarca, S. and Tinini, R. (1994, “A prototype of an integrated coordination support system”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 209‐38.

Bair, J. (1993, “Contrasting workflow models: getting to the roots of three vendors”, GroupWare’93 Proceedings, 9‐13 August, San Jose, CA, pp. 229‐37.

Bowers, J.M. and Churcher, J. (1988, “Local and global structuring of computer mediated communication: developing linguistic perspectives on CSCW in COSMOS”, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on CSCW, Portland, OR, 26‐28 September, pp. 125‐39.

Davenport, T.H. (1993, Process Innovation ‐ Reengineering Work through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

De Michelis, G. (1990, “Computer support for cooperative work”, position paper, Butler Cox Foundation, London, October.

De Michelis, G. (1995, “Computer support for cooperative work: computers between users and social complexity”, in Bagnara, S., Zucchermaglio, C. and Stucky, S. (Eds), Organizational Learning and Technological Change, Springer, Berlin.

De Michelis, G. and Grasso, M.A. (1993, “Situating conversations within the language/action perspective: the Milan conversation model”, in Furuta, R. and Neuwirth, C. (Eds), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer‐supported Cooperative Work, ACM, Chapel Hill, NC, 22‐26 October, pp. 89‐100.

Denning, P.J. (1992, “Work is a closed‐loop process”, American Scientist, Vol. 80, July/August, pp. 314‐17.

Denning, P.J. and Medina‐Mora, R. (1994, “Case study: George Mason University”, in White, T.E. and Fischer, L. (Eds), New Tools for New Times: The Workflow Paradigm, Future Strategies Inc., Alameda, CA, pp. 235‐51.

Hales, K. and Lavery, M. (1991, Workflow Management Software: The Business Opportunity, Ovum Ltd, London.

Hall, G., Rosenthal, J. and Wade, J. (1993, “How to make reengineering really work”, Harvard Business Review, November‐December, pp. 119‐31.

Hammer, M. (1990, “Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate”, Harvard Business Review, July/August, pp. 104‐11.

Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993, Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper, New York, NY.

Keen, P.G.W. (1991, Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Maglitta, G. (1994, “Interview with Michael Hammer”, ComputerWorld, 24 January, pp. 84‐6.

Malone, T.W. and Crowston, K. (1990, “What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems?”, in Proceedings of the Third Conference on CSCW, ACM, Los Angeles, CA, 7‐10 October, pp. 357‐70.

Marshak, R.T. (1993, “Young & Rubicam improves productivity with workflow”, Workgroup Computing Report, Vol. 16 No. 5, Patricia Seybold Group, Boston, MA, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 2‐20.

Medina‐Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R. and Flores, F. (1992, “The ActionWorkflow approach to workflow management technology”, in Turner, J. and Kraut, R. (Eds), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer‐supported Cooperative Work, ACM, Toronto, Canada, 31 October‐4 November, pp. 281‐8.

Meyer‐Roux, J. and Vossen, P. (1994, “The first phase of the MARS project, 1983‐1993: overview, methods and results”, in Bernard, A.C. and Meyer‐Roux, J. (Eds), Proceedings of the Conference on the MARS Project: Overview and Perspectives, EUR 15599 of the Office for Official Publications of the EC, Luxembourg, pp. 33‐81.

Robinson, M. (1991, “Double‐level languages and cooperative working”, A.I. & Society, Vol. 5, pp. 34‐60.

Schäl, T. (1995, Workflow Management Systems for Process Organizations, Arbeits und Forschungsbericht aus dem HDZ/IMA der RWTH Aachen (D82 Diss. RWTH Aachen), Aachen (to appear in Springer, Berlin).

Schäl, T. (1996, “System design for cooperative work in the language/action perspective: a case study of The Coordinator”, in Shapiro, D., Tauber, M. and Traunmuller, R. (Eds), The Design of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware Systems, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 377‐400.

Schäl, T. and Zeller, B. (1990, “A methodological approach to computer supported cooperative work”, Proceedings Fifth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics, Urbino, 3‐6 September, pp. 291‐304.

Schäl, T. and Zeller, B. (1991, “Design principles for cooperative office support systems in distributed process management”, in Verrijn‐Stuart, A.et al. (Eds), Support Functionality in the Office Environment, North‐Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 85‐101.

Schäl, T. and Zeller, B. (1992, “Organizational, technological and methodological issues to design cooperative networks”, Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on ‘Informatics and Psychology’, Schärding, Austria, 9‐11 June (to appear in Tauber, M. and Waern, Y. (Eds), roceedings of the International Conference on Task Analysis, North‐Holland, Amsterdam)

Schäl, T. and Zeller, B. (1993, “Workflow management systems for financial services”, in Kaplan, S. (Ed.), Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 142‐53.

Schwartz, J. (1993, “Here today, here tomorrow”, Information Week, 10 May, p. 35.

Suchman, L. (1994, “Do categories have politics? the language/action perspective reconsidered”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 177‐90.

Vossen, P. (1992, “Timely forecasting of national sugar beet production in Europe: the CEC methodology and planned improvements using data from satellites”, Proceedings of the 55th Winter Congress of the International Institute for Sugar Beet Research, Brussels, Belgium, 12‐13 February, pp. 261‐81.

White, T.E. and Fischer, L. (Eds) (1994, New Tools for New Times: The Workflow Paradigm, Future Strategies Inc., Alameda, CA.

Winograd, T. and Flores, C.F. (1986, Understanding Computers and Cognition ‐ A New Foundation for Design, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.