Sự thấu hiểu tương tự: hướng tới sự thống nhất giữa phân loại và tương tự

Cognitive Processing - Tập 11 - Trang 331-345 - 2010
Eric Dietrich1
1Department of Philosophy, Binghamton University, Binghamton, USA

Tóm tắt

Mục đích của bài báo này là trình bày hai loại thay đổi đại diện tương tự, cả hai đều xảy ra sớm trong quá trình tạo ra tương tự, và sau đó, dựa trên hai loại thay đổi này, để trình bày một mô hình thống nhất một loại tạo ra tương tự và phân loại. Sự thống nhất được đề xuất dựa trên ba tuyên bố chính: (1) một loại trừu tượng đại diện nhanh chóng nhất định là rất quan trọng để thực hiện các tương tự liên quan (đây là loại thay đổi đại diện đầu tiên; một mô hình máy tính được trình bày để chứng minh loại trừu tượng này), (2) các trừu tượng nhanh chóng được khơi dậy qua khoảng cách tâm lý lớn, và (3) cả phân loại và tương tự đều cung cấp hiểu biết về đầu vào cảm giác thông qua việc cấu trúc lại, mà đây được đề xuất là một loại phân loại (đây là loại thay đổi đại diện thứ hai). Chính việc cấu trúc lại đã hoàn tất sự thống nhất.

Từ khóa

#tương tự #phân loại #thay đổi đại diện #trừu tượng #cấu trúc lại

Tài liệu tham khảo

Atkins L (2004) Analogies as categorization phenomena: studies from scientific discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park Barsalou L (2003) Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1177–1187 Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115–147 Bruner JS (1957) Going beyond the information given. In: Bruner JS, Brunswik E, Festinger L, Heider F, Muenzinger KF, Osgood CE, Rapaport D (eds) Contemporary approaches to cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 41–69 Day SB, Goldstone RL (2009) Analogical transfer from interaction with a simulated physical system. In: Proceedings of the thirty-first annual conference of the cognitive science society Dietrich E (2000) Analogy and conceptual change, or you can’t step into the same mind twice. In: Dietrich E, Markman A (eds) Cognitive dynamics: conceptual change in humans and machines. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 265–294 Dietrich E (2006) Representation. In: Gabbay DM, Thagard P, Woods J (eds) Handbook of philosophy of psychology and cognitive science. Handbook of the philosophy of science, vol 12. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam Dietrich E (2008) Toward extending the relational priming model: six questions. Behav Brain Sci Dietrich E, Markman A, Winkley M (2003) The prepared mind: the role of representational change in chance discovery. In: Ohsawa Y, McBurney P (eds) Chance discovery by machines. Springer, Berlin, pp 208–230 Dixon JA, Dohn MC (2003) Redescription disembeds relations: evidence from relational transfer and use in problem solving. Memory Cogn 31:1082–1093 Doumas L, Hummel J, Sandhofer C (2008) A theory of the discovery and prediction of relational concepts. Psychol Rev 115(1):1–43 Dretske F (1981) Knowledge and flow of information. MIT, Cambridge Dunbar K (2001) The analogical paradox: why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In: Gentner D, Holyoak K, Kokinov B (eds) The analogical mind. MIT, Cambridge Falkenhainer B (1990a) A unified approach to explanation and theory formation. In: Shrager Langley (ed) Computational models of scientific discovery and theory formation. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo Falkenhainer B (1990b) Analogical interpretation in context. In: Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Lawrence Erlbaum, Cambridge Falkenhainer B, Forbus K, Gentner D (1989) The structure-mapping engine: algorithm and examples. Artif Intell 41(1):1–63 Forbus K, Gentner D, Law K (1995) MAC/FAC: a model of similarity-based retrieval. Cogn Sci 19:141–205 Forbus K, Gentner D, Markman A, Ferguson R (1998) Analogy just looks like high-level perception. Why a domain-general approach to analogoical mapping is right. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 10:231–257 French RM (1995) The subtlety of sameness: a theory and computer model of analogy-making. MIT, Cambridge Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn Sci 7:155–170 Gentner D (1989) The mechanisms of analogical learning. In: Vosniadou S, Ortony A (eds) Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 199–241 Gentner D, Colhoun J (2010) Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In: von Müller A, Pöppel E (Series eds), Glatzeder B, Goel V, von Müller A (Vol. eds) On thinking: vol. 2. Towards a theory of thinking. Springer, Berlin Gentner D, Wolff P (2000) Metaphor and knowledge change. In: Dietrich E, Markman A (eds) Cognitive dynamics: conceptual and representational change in humans and machines. pp 295–342 Gick ML, Holyoak KJ (1980) Analogical problem solving. Cogn Psychol 12:306–355 Holyoak K, Thagard P (1989) Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cogn Sci 13:295–355 Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1995) Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. MIT, Cambridge Hummel J, Choplin J (2000) Toward an integrated account of reflexive and reflective reasoning. In: Gleitman LR, Joshi AK (eds) Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the cognitive science society. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 232–237 Hummel JE, Holyoak KJ (1997) Distributed representations of structure: a theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychol Rev 104(3):427–466 Hummel JE, Holyoak KJ (2003) A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychol Rev 110(2):220–264 Indurkhya B (1992) Metaphor and cognition. Kluwer, Dordrecht Indurkhya B (1997) Metaphor as change of representation. J Exp Theor AI 9(1):1–36 Indurkhya B (1998) On creation of features and change of representation. J Jpn Cogn Sci Soc 5(2):43–56 Keane M (1996) On adaptation in analogy: tests of pragmatic-importance and adaptability in analogical problem solving. Q J Exp Psychol 49A:1062–1085 Keane M (1997) What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and structure on analogical mapping. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 23:946–967 Keane M, Brayshaw M (1988) The incremental analogy machine: a computational model of analogy. In: Sleeman D (ed) Third European working session on machine learning. Pitman, London Keane M, Ledgeway T, Duff S (1994) Constraints on analogical mapping: a comparison of three models. Cogn Sci 18:387–438 Kokinov B, Petrov A (2001) Integrating memory and reasoning in analogy-making: the AMBR model. In: Gentner D, Holyoak K, Kokinov B (eds) The analogical mind. MIT, Cambridge Kuehne SE, Forbus KD, Gentner D, Quinn B. (2000) Category learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping. In: Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the cognitive science society, pp 770–775 Kurtz K (2005) Re-representation in comparison: building an empirical case. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 17:447–459 Kurtz K (2007) The divergent autoencoder (DIVA) model of category learning. Psychon Bull Rev 14(4):560–576 Kurtz K, Dietrich E (2006) Construing categories. Unpublished manuscript Leech R, Mareschal D, Cooper RP (2008) Analogy as relational priming: a developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill. Behav Brain Sci Liberman N, Förster J (2009) The effect of psychological distance on perceptual level of construal. Cogn Sci 33(7):1330–1341 Liberman N, Trope Y (2008) The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science 322(21):1201–1205 Lipson J (1981) Elements of algebra and algebraic computing. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park Markman A, Dietrich E (1998) In defense of representation as mediation (plus several replies to commentaries). Psycoloquy.98.9.48.representation-mediation. http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?9.48 Markman A, Dietrich E (2000) In defense of representations. Cogn Psychol 40:138–171 Mitchell M (1993) Analogy-making as perception: a computational model. MIT, Cambridge Ramscar M, Yarlett D (2003) Semantic grounding in models of analogy: an environmental approach. Cogn Sci 27:41–71 Rapaport WJ (1988) Syntactic semantics: foundations of computational natural-language understanding. In: Fetzer JH (ed) Aspects of artificial intelligence. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 81–131 Rapaport WJ (1995) Understanding understanding: syntactic semantics and computational cognition. In: Tomberlin JE (ed) Philosophical perspectives, vol 9: AI, connectionism, and philosophical psychology. Ridgeview, Atascadero, pp 49–88 Rapaport WJ (1999) Implementation is semantic interpretation. Monist 82:109–130 Skorstad J, Gentner D, Medin D (1988) Abstraction processes during concept learning: a structural view. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Erlbaum Thagard P, Holyoak K, Nelson G, Gochfeld D (1990) Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction. Artif Intell 46:259–310 Tsotsos JK (1990) Analysing vision at the complexity level. Behav Brain Sci 13–3:423–445 Tsotsos JK (1995) Behaviorist intelligence and the scaling problem. Artif Intell 75:135–160 Turney P (2008) The latent relation mapping engine: algorithm and experiments. J Artif Intell Res 33:615–655 Usborne M, Lee B (1997) Going beyond the information given: seeing versus seeing as. Perception 26 Wilson D (1983) Rutherford: simple genius. MIT, Cambridge Winkley M (2006) Strang: a model of analogical retrieval-based structural change. Ph. D. dissertation, Philosophy and Cognitive Science Program, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York Wisniewski E (1997) When concepts combine. Psychon Bull Rev 4(2):167–183