Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment — a literature review

Waste Management & Research - Tập 27 Số 1 - Trang 3-18 - 2009
Süleyman Sakar1, Kaan Yetilmezsoy1, Emel Kıyan1
1Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Environmental Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34349, Yildiz, Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey

Tóm tắt

A literature review has been undertaken to investigate the performance of the different anaerobic process configurations and operational conditions used in poultry and livestock waste treatment. The results of the extensive literature review showed that a wide range of different reactor volumes varying from 100 mL to 95 m 3 were utilized in the investigation of anaerobic processing of poultry manure. Retention times studied were between 13.2 h and 91 days. Most of studies were carried out under mesophilic conditions maintained between 25 and 35°C. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removals and organic loading rate (OLR) ranged from 32 to 78%, and from 1.1 to 2.9 kg COD m—3 day—1, respectively. Biogas yields were achieved between 180 mL g—1 COD added and 74 m3 day—1 for a wide range of different reactor configurations. Up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) seems to be a suitable process for the treatment of poultry manure wastewater and the liquid fraction of hen manure, due to its ability to maintain a sufficient amount of active biomass. The literature review showed that various reactor configurations such as fixed-film reactor, attached-film bioreactor, anaerobic rotating biological reactor, batch reactors, downflow anaerobic filter, fixed dome plant, UASB, continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR), up-flow anaerobic filter (UAF), temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD), anaerobic hybrid reactor (AHR), and two-stage anaerobic systems are well suited to anaerobic processing of cattle manure. At both mesophilic and thermophilic conditions, high COD removals (87—95%) were achieved for treatment of cattle manure wastewaters. The COD and volatile solids (VS) reductions obtained were 37.9 to 94% and 9.6 to 92%, respectively. During the studies, OLR and retention times ranged between 0.117 and 7.3 g VS L—1 day—1 and between 0.5 and 140 days, respectively. In anaerobic processing of cattle manure, methane yields between 48 mmol CH4 L— 1 and 4681.3 m3 CH4 month— 1 were found for the corresponding reactor volumes of 120 mL and 1300 m3, respectively. In anaerobic processing of swine manure, OLR ranged from 0.9 to 15.42 g VS L—1 day— 1 at mesophilic conditions (25—35°C). The reactor volumes varied between 125 mL and 380 L. Temperature and retention times ranged from 25 to 60°C, and 0.9 to 113 days, respectively. COD and VS reductions achieved were between 57 and 78% and between 34.5 and 61%, respectively. Moreover, methane yields were obtained between 22 and 360 mL CH4 g —1 VS added. The results showed that UASB, anaerobic baffled reactors, CSTR, and anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) were successfully utilized in anaerobic processing of swine manure at both mesophilic and thermophilic conditions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0306-2619(76)90022-2

10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00526-1

Amatya, P.L., 1996, Anaerobic treatment of tapioca starch industry wastewater by bench scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor

10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00059-8

10.1016/0043-1354(94)90153-8

10.1080/009083190519023

10.1023/A:1015871601658

10.1016/0141-4607(84)90015-5

10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00178-8

Burton, C.H., 2003, Anaerobic treatment options for animal manures, 2

10.1081/ESE-120023333

10.1177/0734247X0202000406

Chastain, J.P., 2004, Poultry manure production and nutrient content

Cheung, P.W.S., Proc. of Conference - Joint 2002 CSCE/ASCE International Conference on Environmental Engineering - An International Perspective on Environmental Engineering

Converse, J.C., 1977, Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 77

10.1007/s11274-005-7371-6

Dukes, G.W., Proc. 1984 Triangle Conference on Environmental Technology

10.1590/S0104-66321997000400016

Garcelon, J., 2000, Waste Digester Design

10.1080/00908310050013758

Ghangrekar, M.M., 2003, IE (I) Journal-EN, 84, 16

Gripentrog, H.W., 2005, Economical and Environmental Analysis of a Biogas Plant within the Context of a Real Farm

10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.019

10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00201-7

10.1016/0960-8524(92)90123-F

10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00008-0

Jones, D., 2003, Animal Manure and Wastewater Treatment

10.1080/009083101316862462

10.1080/00908310490451403

10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00040-6

10.2166/wst.1999.0047

10.1016/S0921-3449(04)00119-3

10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00133-X

Köttner, M., 2001, Biogas in agriculture and industry potentials, present use and perspectives

Lahav, O., 2000, Water SA, 26, 389

10.1016/0141-4607(84)90078-7

10.1016/0144-4565(85)90055-1

10.1016/0144-4565(86)90112-5

10.1016/0141-4607(86)90136-8

10.1016/0960-8524(94)90114-7

Lorimor, J., 2000, Manure Characteristics. Manure Management System Series. Section 1, MWPS (Midwest Plan Service)-18

10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00087-0

10.1177/0734242X0101900508

10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00064-6

10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00009-9

10.2166/wst.2003.0412

Nelson, C., 2002, Final: Haubenschild Farms Anaerobic Digester Updated! The Minnesota Project

10.1002/bit.20037

10.2166/wst.1999.0046

Ozturk, I. (1999) Anaerobic biotechnology and its applications in waste treatment, pp. 11-46. Turkish Water Foundation Publishing Corp. , Istanbul.

Pfost, D.L., Fulhage, C.D. & Alber, O. (2001) Land Application Equipment for Livestock and Poultry Manure Management. Environmental Quality, MU Guide, University of Missouri-Columbia, EQ383.

Rehling, U., 2001, Small biogas plants, Biogas plant for rural household. Design & Construction

Sadaka, S., Proc. of ASAE Annual Intenational Meeting, Technical Papers: Engineering Solutions for a New Century

Sung, S., 2001, Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, 4, 301

10.1016/S0961-9534(96)00038-4

10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00021-1

10.1016/0960-8524(91)90174-I

Troyer, S.J., Proceedings of the 1997 29th Mid-Atlantic Industrial and Hazardous Waste, Conference

10.1016/S0141-4607(85)80025-1

Wellinger, A., 1999, Process Design of Agricultural Digesters

Welsh, F.W., 1977, Canadian Agricultural Engineering, 19, 122

Werner, U., A Publication of the Deutsches Zentrum für Entwicklungstechnologien-GATE, a Division of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH

10.1016/0269-7483(90)90161-K

van Lier, J.B., Proceedings of ACHEMA 2006, 28th Int. Exhibition Conference on Chemical Technology

10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00135-1

10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00069-2

Verma, S., 2002, Anaerobic digestion of biodegradable organics in municipal solid wastes

10.13031/2013.21307

10.13031/2013.3083

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Waste Management & Research

Tập 27 Số 1

3-18

Thông tin tác giả