An update of pitfalls in prostate mpMRI: a practical approach through the lens of PI-RADS v. 2 guidelines

Langer DL et al (2009) Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI: Logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:327–334

Delongchamps NB et al (2011) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. BJU Int 107:1411–1418

Dickinson L et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 59:477–494

de Rooij M et al (2014) Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 202:343–351

Muller BG et al (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 277:741–750

Barentsz JO et al (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines. Eur Radiol 22:746–757

Weinreb JC et al (2016) PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40

Steiger P et al (2016) Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report. Cancer Imaging 16:9

Panebianco V et al (2015) Pitfalls in Interpreting mp-MRI of the Prostate: A Pictorial Review with Pathologic Correlation. Insights Imaging 6:611–630

Rosenkrantz AB (2014) Radiologist, be aware: ten pitfalls that confound the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI. Am J Roentgenol 202:109–120

Kitzing YX et al (2016) Benign Conditions That Mimic Prostate Carcinoma: MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation. Radiographics 36:162–175

Oyen RH et al (1993) Benign hyperplastic nodules that originate in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland. Radiology 189:707–711

Guneyli S et al (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Diagn Interv Radiol 22:215–219

Ahmed HU et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389(10071):815–822

Hassanzadeh E et al (2017) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): A pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:278–289

Bomers JG et al (2014) Standardization of Multiparametric Prostate MR Imaging Using PI-RADS. Biomed Res Int 2014:431680

Akin O et al (2006) Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 239:784–792

Li H et al (2006) Conventional MRI capabilities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the transition zone. Am J Roentgenol 186:729–742

Kayhan A et al (2010) Multi-parametric MR imaging of transition zone prostate cancer: Imaging features, detection and staging. World J Radiol 2:180–187

Giganti F et al (2017) MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4858-0

Schimmöller L et al (2014) MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy. Eur Radiol 24:2582–2589

Rosenkrantz AB et al (2015) Transition Zone Prostate Cancer: Revisiting the Role of Multiparametric MRI at 3 T. Am J Roentgenol 204:W266–W272

Oto A et al (2010) Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 257:715–723