An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance

AAM (Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers), 2003. Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, Version 2.1. Barickman, 1999, MicroDAS: an in-vehicle portable data acquisition system, Transport. Res. Rec., 1689, 1, 10.3141/1689-01 Byers, 1989, Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: are paired comparisons necessary?, 481 Consiglio, 2003, Effect of telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 35, 495, 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00027-1 EEC, 1999. Commission Recommendation of 21 December 1999 on Safe and Efficient In-vehicle Information and Communication Systems: A European Statement of Principles on Human Machine Interface, Official Journal of the European Communities L 19/64, 25.1.2000. European Commission DGXIII, Brussels. Eizenman, M., Jares, T., Smiley, A., March 1999. A new methodology for the analysis of eye-movements and visual scanning in drivers. Transport Canada Contract Report. Geary, 1991, Cognitive addition: strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in young and elderly adults, Psychol. Aging, 6, 474, 10.1037/0882-7974.6.3.474 Goodman, 1999, Using cellular phones in vehicle: safe or unsafe?, Transport. Hum. Factors, 1, 3, 10.1207/sthf0101_2 Green, P., June 1999. Visual and Task Demands of Driver Information Systems. UMTRI 98-16. Hancock, 2003, The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 35, 501, 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00028-3 Harbluk, J.L., Lalande, S., June 2005. Performing email tasks while driving: the impact of speech-based tasks on visual detection. Driving Assessment 2005. Rockport, Maine. Hart, 1988, Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of experimental and theoretical research, 139 Horrey, 2002 Horrey, 2006, Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques, Hum. Factors, 48, 196, 10.1518/001872006776412135 IIHS, 2006. http://www.iihs.org/research/quand/urban.html. ITSA, 2005. http://www.itsa.org/ITSNEWS.NSF/key/C46A?OpenDocument. Kawano, 2005, Degraded voices through mobile phones and the neural effects: a possible risk of using mobile phones during driving, Transport. Res. Part F, 8, 331, 10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.016 Keppel, 1982 Lee, 2001, Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: the effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers’ attention to the Roadway, Hum. Factors, 43, 631, 10.1518/001872001775870340 McCartt, 2006, Cell phones and driving: review of the research, Traffic Injury Prevent., 7, 89, 10.1080/15389580600651103 McEvoy, S.P., Stevenson, M.R., McCartt, A.T., Woodward, M., Haworth, C., Palamara, P., Cercarelli, R., 2005. Role of mobile phones in motor vehicles crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. Br. Med. J., doi:10.1136/bmj.38537.397512.55 (published 12 July 2005). McKnight, 1993, The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 25, 259, 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90020-W Mortimer, R.G., Segel, L., Dugoff, H., Campbell, J.D., Jorgeson, C.M., Murphy, R.W., 1970. Brake force requirement study: driver-vehicle braking performance as a function of brake system design variables. HSRI Report HuF-6, University of Michigan, NTIS Report: PB-193-258. NHTSA, 2006. The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk. Available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/810594/images/810594.pdf. Newcomb, T.P., 1981. Driver Behavior During Braking. SAE Technical Paper Series, 810832. PR Newswire, 2005. http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/04-13-2005/0003389174&EDATE. Recarte, 2000, Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving, J. Exp. Psychol. Appl., 6, 31, 10.1037/1076-898X.6.1.31 Recarte, 2003, Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making, J. Exp. Psychol. Appl., 9, 119, 10.1037/1076-898X.9.2.119 Rumar, 1990, The basic driver error: late detection, Ergonomics, 33, 1281, 10.1080/00140139008925332 Shinar, 2005, Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving, Accid. Anal. Prevent., 37, 315, 10.1016/j.aap.2004.09.007 Smith, 2005, A study of driver visual behavior while talking with passengers, and on mobile phones, 11 Strayer, 2001, Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone, Psychol. Sci., 12, 462, 10.1111/1467-9280.00386 Strayer, 2004, Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers, Hum. Factors, 46, 640, 10.1518/hfes.46.4.640.56806 Strayer, 2006, A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver, Hum. Factors, 48, 381, 10.1518/001872006777724471 Sundeen, M., 2005. Cell Phones and Highway Safety, State Legislature Update. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/transportation/cellphoneupdate05.htm. Treat, J.R., Tumbas, N.S., McDonald, S.T., Shinar, D., Hume, R.D., Mayer, R.E., Stansifer, R.L., Castellan, N.J., 1979. Tri-Level Study on the Causes of Traffic Accidents: Final Report, vol. I and II. U.S. DOT HS-805-086 (NTIS PB 80-121064). Treffner, 2004, Hands-free phone speech while driving degrades coordination and control, Transport. Res. Part F, 7, 229, 10.1016/j.trf.2004.09.002 Victor, 2005, Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty, Transport. Res. Part F, 8, 167, 10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.014 Wickens, 2001, Attention to safety and the psychology of surprise Wierwille, 1998, Modeling the relationship between driver in-vehicle visual demands and accident occurrence, 233