An investigation on the cost implications of methodology of sub‐contract work pricing

Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction - 2009
IanDow1, BegumSertyesilisik2, Andrew DavidRoss1
1School of the Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
2Division of Construction Management, Civil Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify how much particular variables influence the cost differences between order values and final accounts for certain trade subcontractors.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology consists of a literature survey and a case study. A sample of 33 projects, undertaken by a contracting organisation, are analysed as a basis for testing their significance.FindingsFor highly asset specific transactions the research suggests that the level of variables which can affect their performance is greatest, suggesting integration within the contracting firm to mitigate the threat of opportunistic behaviour. Procurement route utilised on a project was strongly linked to outturn cost performance, as is inclusion in the tender bid, suggesting earlier subcontractor involvement through design and build and partnering arrangements is significantly better at managing subcontractor cost performance than traditional routes.Originality/valueThe market volatility of the construction industry has meant the procurement of subcontractors has long been established as an important part of the project coalition. Transaction cost economic theory has recently become popular within the construction research industry. Much of this research has examined the vertical boundaries to which a construction firm is subjected when considering integration of trades or continued use of subcontractors. Empirical data on the cost performance of subcontractors within a project environment are not widely available. For this reason, this research aids practitioners and researchers by identifying why particular variables influence the cost differences between order values and final accounts for certain trade subcontractors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bridge, A.J. and Tisdell, C. (2004), “The determinants of the vertical boundaries of the construction firm”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 807‐25.

Chang, C.Y. and Ive, G. (2002), “Rethinking the multi‐attribute utility approach based procurement route selection technique”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 275‐84.

Cooke, B. and Williams, P. (2004), Construction Planning Programming & Control, 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford.

Costantino, N. and Pietroforte, R. (2006), “The adoption rate of e‐commerce in the US and Italian construction markets: some reasons for its variability”, ITcon, Vol. 11, Special issue, pp. 103‐11.

Dainty, A.R., Briscoe, G.H. and Millitt, S.J. (2001), “Subcontractor perspectives on supply chain alliances”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19 No. 8, pp. 841‐8.

Doyle, A. and Hughes, W. (2000), “The influence of project complexity on estimating accuracy”, paper presented at the 16th Annual ARCOM Conference, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Glasgow Caledonian University, 6‐8 September, available at: www.arcom.ac.uk (accessed 20 November 2006).

DTI (2005a), available at: www.dti.gov.uk/sectors/construction/index.html (accessed 7 March 2007).

DTI (2005b), “Construction sector unit annual report 2004/05”, available at: www.dti.gov.uk/sectors/construction/index.html (accessed 7 March 2007).

DTI (2006), “Construction statistics annual report 2006”, available at: www.dti.gov.uk/sectors/construction/ConstructionStatistics/page16429.html (accessed 7 March 2007).

Eccles, R.G. (1981), “Bureaucratic versus craft administration: the relationship of market structure to the construction firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 449‐69.

Egan, J. (1998), Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, on the Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of UK Construction, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, available at: www.ihsti.com/cis/default.aspx?x&UseSplitLicencing=Yes&authcode=403BE39 (accessed 15 November 2006).

Ekström, M.A., Björnsson, H.C., Kunz, J.C., Levitt, R.E. and Nass, C.I. (2003), The Impact of Rating Systems on Subcontracting Decisions – A Transaction Cost Analysis, CIFE Technical Report 135, Stanford University, available at: www.stanford.edu/group/CIFE/online.publications/TR135.pdf (accessed 12 October 2006).

Elliman, T. and Orange, G. (2003), “Developing distributed design capabilities in the construction supply chain”, Construction Innovation, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 15‐26.

Field, A. (2000), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows, Sage, London.

Gladstone, J., Humphreys, K.K. and Lunde, B.K. (1987), Mechanical Estimating Guidebook for Building Construction, 5th ed., McGraw‐Hill, London.

Greenwood, D. (2001), “Subcontract procurement: are relationships changing?”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 5‐7.

Jaggar, D., Ross, A., Smith, J. and Love, P. (2002), Building Design Cost Management, Blackwell Science, Oxford.

Kale, S. and Arditi, D. (2001), “General contractors' relationships with subcontractors: a strategic asset”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 541‐9.

Kvaløy, O. (2003), Asset Specificity and Vertical Integration, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Stavanger University College, available at: www.nhh.no/for/dp/2003/0703.pdf (accessed 13 October 2006).

Latham, M. (1994), Constructing the Team: Final Report of the Government Industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry, HMSO, London, available at: www.ihsti.com/cis/Search.aspx?AuthCode=403BE39&sc=pg% 3dUK%3bany%3dlatham (accessed 15 November 2006).

Leung, M.Y. and Liu, A.M.M. (2003), “Analysis of value and project goal specificity in value management”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 11‐19.

Masterman, J.W.E. (2002), Introduction to Building Procurement Systems, 2nd ed., Spon Press, London.

National Audit Office (2001), Modernising Construction, Press Office of National Audit Office, London, available at: www.ihsti.com/cis/Search.aspx?AuthCode=403BE39&sc=pg% 3dUK%3bany%3dlatham (accessed 15 November 2006).

Neumann, A. and Hirschhausen, C.V. (2006), “Long‐terms contracts and asset specificity revisited – an empirical analysis of producer‐importer relations in the natural gas industry”, Working Paper 0610, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, available at: www.web.mit.edu/ceepr/www/2006‐010pdf (accessed 13 October 2006).

Peace, S. and Bennett, J. (2003a), How to Use a Traditional Approach for a Construction Project: A Client Guide, Chartered Institute of Building, Ascot, available at: www.ihsti.com/cis/ Search.aspx?AuthCode=403BE39&sc=pg%3dUK%3bany%3dciob+how+to (accessed 13 November 2006).

Peace, S. and Bennett, J. (2003b), How to Use a Design Build Approach for a Construction Project: A Client Guide, Chartered Institute of Building, Ascot, available at: www.ihsti.com/cis/ Search.aspx?AuthCode=403BE39&sc=pg%3dUK%3bany%3dciob+how+to (accessed 13 November 2006).

Peace, S. and Bennett, J. (2003c), How to Use a Partnering Approach for a Construction Project: A Client Guide, Chartered Institute of Building, Ascot, available at: www.ihsti.com/cis/ Search.aspx?AuthCode=403BE39&sc=pg%3dUK%3bany%3dciob+how+to (accessed 13 November 2006).

Pryke, S. (2004), “Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 787‐97.

Salkind, N.J. (2004), Statistics for People Who (Think They) Hate Statistics, Sage, London.

Shiau, Y.C., Tsai, T.P., Wang, W.C. and Huang, M.L. (2002), Use Questionnaire and AHP Techniques to Develop Subcontractor Selection System, Vol. 989, National Institute of Standards and Technology, SP, pp. 35‐40, available at: www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build02/PDF/b02143.pdf (accessed 5 February 2007).

Swaffield, L.M. and Pasquire, C.L. (1999), “Examination of relationships between building form and function and the cost of mechanical and electrical services”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 483‐92.

Weaver, T.W. (1971), Building Services Design, A Systematic Approach to Decision‐making, RIBA Publications, London.

Williamson, O.E. (1979), “Transaction‐cost economics: the governance of contractual relations”, Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 233‐61.

Williamson, O.E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Winch, G. (1989), “The construction firm and the construction project: a transaction cost approach”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 331‐45.

Winch, G. (2000), “Institutional reform in British construction: partnering and private Finance”, Building Research and Information, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 141‐55.

McGuinness, T. (1994), Markets and Managerial Hierarchies. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks, Sage, London.

Tyng, A.K. (2006), “Partnering in construction conflicts”, MSc dissertation, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction

Thông tin tác giả