An interest-group theory of population growth
Tóm tắt
This paper applies the interest-group theory of government to explain population growth. The main argument is that countries whose populations are more ethnically heterogeneous will tend to have higher fertility rates because there are more interest groups which compete for control of the political process of wealth redistribution. The theoretical model is supported by empirical evidence using data on 130 countries for 1980.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Becker GS (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In: Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Universities-National Bureau Conference series 11. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Becker GS, Lewis HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 81(2):S279-S288
Becker GS, Tomes N (1976) Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 84 (2):5143–5163
Ben-Porath Y (1973) Economic analysis of fertility in Israel: Point and counterpoint. J Polit Econ 81(2):S202-S233
Ben-Porath Y (1976) Fertility response to child mortality: Micro data from Israel. J Polit Econ 84(4): S163-S178
DeTray DN (1973) Child quality and the demand for children. J Polit Econ 81(2):S70-S95
Gardner B (1973) Economics of the size of North Carolina rural families. J Polit Econ 81(2): S99-S121
Gronau R (1973) The effect of children on the housewife's value of time. J Polit Econ 81(2): S168-S199
Hashimoto M (1974) Economics of postwar fertility in Japan: Differentials and trends. J Polit Econ 88(2):S170-S194
Kurian GT (1984) The new book of world rankings 1984. Facts on File, New York
Michael RT (1973) Education and the derived demand for children. J Polit Econ 81(2):S128-S163
Nerlove M (1974) Household and economy: Toward a new theory of population and economic growth. J Polit Econ 82(2):S200-S218
Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ 2:3–21
Schultz TP (1973) Explanation of birth rate changes over space and time: A study of Taiwan. J Polit Econ 81(2):S238-S274