An integrated fuzzy decision model for prioritization of barriers affecting sustainability adoption within supply chains under unknown weight context

Operations Management Research - Tập 15 - Trang 1010-1027 - 2022
R. Krishankumar1, P. P. Amritha2, K. S. Ravichandran3
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Coimbatore, India
2TIFAC-CORE in Cyber Security, Amrita School of Engineering, Coimbatore, India
3Department of Mathematics, Amrita School of Physical Sciences, Coimbatore, India

Tóm tắt

Industry 4.0 and the emergence of the circular economy have inspired industries to rigorously concentrate on digital technologies (DTs). There is an excellent appetite for DTs in developing countries like India, and initiatives such as Digital India have transformed business to a more sustainable dimension. Encouraged to adopt DTs, industries identify practical barriers at the social, environmental and economic levels. Although the literature provides discussion on these barriers, a rational prioritization is lacking. To circumvent the problem, a fuzzy decision model is put forward. Firstly, the barriers affecting DT adoption are reviewed and industry experts can rate the barriers after that. Owing to the diversification/heterogeneity of the experts, biased weights are determined by the fuzzy-attitudinal-CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) technique. Furthermore, the barriers are prioritized by proposing the interactive COomplex PRoportional ASsessment (COPRAS) algorithm. Finally, a case example from the food industry is exemplified so as to understand the usefulness of the model, and a comparison with the other models is made so as to realize the benefits and the shortcomings.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Al Asbahi AAMH, Fang ZG, Chandio ZA, Tunio MK, Ahmed J, Abbas M (2020) Assessing barriers and solutions for Yemen energy crisis to adopt green and sustainable practices: a fuzzy multi-criteria analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(29):36765–36781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09700-5 Alkan Ö, Albayrak ÖK (2020) Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA. Renew Energy 162:712–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.062 Anbuudayasankar SP, Srikanthan R, Karthik M, Nair PR, Sivakarthik N, Indukumar P (2020) Cloud-based technology for small and medium scale enterprises: A decision-making paradigm using IPA, AHP and fuzzy-AHP techniques. Int J Integr Supply Manag 13(4):335–352. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2020.110732 Asante D, Ampah JD, Afrane S, Adjei-Darko P, Asante B, Fosu E, Amoh PO (2022) Prioritizing strategies to eliminate barriers to renewable energy adoption and development in Ghana: A CRITIC-fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Renew Energy 195:47–65 Babatunde MO, Ighravwe DE (2019) A CRITIC-TOPSIS framework for hybrid renewable energy systems evaluation under techno-economic requirements. J Proj Manag 4:109–126. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2018.12.001 Bui TD, Tsai FM, Tseng ML, Ali MDH (2020) Identifying sustainable solid waste management barriers in practice using the fuzzy Delphi method. Resour Conserv Recycl 154:104625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104625 Chatterjee K, Kar S (2018) Supplier selection in telecom supply chain management: A fuzzy-rasch based COPRAS-G method. Technol Econ Dev Econ 24(2):765–791. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2017.1295289 Dalenogare LS, Benitez GB, Ayala NF, Frank AG (2018) The expected contribution of industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int J Prod Econ 204:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 de Sousa L, Jabbour AB, Jabbour CJC, Godinho Filho M, Roubaud D (2018) Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Ann Oper Res 270:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 Dhiman HS, Deb D (2020) Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy COPRAS based multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind farms. Energy 202:117755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117755 Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Comput Oper Res 22(7):763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H Drabe V, Herstatt C (2016) Why and how companies implement circular economy concepts – the case of cradle to cradle innovations. RandD Management Conference 2016 From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation. July 1–11 Drewry JL, Shutske JM, Trechter D, Luck BD, Pitman L (2019) Assessment of digital technology adoption and access barriers among crop, dairy and livestock producers in Wisconsin. Comput Electron Agric 165:104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104960 Ecer F (2021) A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 143:110916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110916 Emeç Ş, Akkaya G (2018) Stochastic AHP and fuzzy VIKOR approach for warehouse location selection problem. J Enterp Inf Manag 31(6):950–962. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2016-0195 Emrouznejad A, Marra M (2017) The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): A literature review with a social network analysis. Int J Prod Res 55(22):6653–6675. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1334976 Farooque M, Jain V, Zhang A, Li Z (2020) Fuzzy DEMATEL analysis of barriers to blockchain-based life cycle assessment in China. Comput Ind Eng 147:106684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106684 Haktanır E, Kahraman C (2022) A novel picture fuzzy CRITIC & REGIME methodology: Wearable health technology application. Eng Appl Artif Intell 113:104942 Heidary Dahooie J, Zamani Babgohari A, Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė I, Govindan K (2021) Prioritising sustainable supply chain management practices by their impact on multiple interacting barriers. Int J Sust Dev World 28(3):267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1795004 Jiskani IM, Cai Q, Zhou W, Lu X (2020) Assessment of risks impeding sustainable mining in Pakistan using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Resour Policy 69:101820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101820 Khan SAR, Zkik K, Belhadi A, Kamble SS (2021) Evaluating barriers and solutions for social sustainability adoption in multi-tier supply chains. Int J Prod Res 59(11):3378–3397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1876271 Khandelwal C, Barua MK (2020) Prioritizing circular supply chain management barriers using fuzzy AHP: Case of the Indian plastic industry. Glob Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920948818 Kim S, Ramkumar M, Subramanian N (2019) Logistics service provider selection for disaster preparation: a socio-technical systems perspective. Ann Oper Res 283(1–2):1259–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-03129-3 Krishankumar R, Garg H, Arun K, Saha A, Ravichandran KS, Kar S (2021) An integrated decision-making COPRAS approach to probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set information. Complex Intell Syst 7:2281–2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00387-w Krishankumar R, Rani P, Ravichandran KS, Aggarwal M, Peng X (2020a) An integrated and discriminative approach for group decision-making with probabilistic linguistic information. Soft Comput 25:3043–3057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05361-1 Krishankumar R, Ravichandran KS, Kar S, Cavallaro F, Zavadskas EK, Mardani A (2019) Scientific decision framework for evaluation of renewable energy sources under q-rung orthopair fuzzy set with partially known weight information. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(15):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154202 Krishankumar R, Ravichandran KS, Sneha S, Shyam S, Kar S, Garg H (2020b) Multi-attribute group decision-making using double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference information. Neural Comput Appl 32:14031–14045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04802-0 Kumar P, Singh RK, Kumar V (2021). Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of industry 4.0 and circular economy: Analysis of barriers. Resour Conserv Recycl 164(October 2020):105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105215 Kumari R, Mishra AR (2020) Multi-criteria COPRAS method based on parametric measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Application of green supplier selection. Iran J Sci Technol - Trans Electr Eng 44:1645–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-020-00312-w Lewandowski M (2016) Designing the business models for circular economy-towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043 Liu Y, Wood LC, Venkatesh VG, Zhang A, Farooque M (2021) Barriers to sustainable food consumption and production in China: A fuzzy DEMATEL analysis from a circular economy perspective. Sustain Prod Consum 28:1114–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.028 Lu L, Zhang S, Wu J, Wei Y (2021) COPRAS method for multiple attribute group decision-making under picture fuzzy environment and their application to green supplier selection. Technol Econ Dev Econ 27:365–385 Mahdiyar A, Mohandes SR, Durdyev S, Tabatabaee S, Ismail S (2020) Barriers to green roof installation: An integrated fuzzy-based MCDM approach. J Clean Prod 269:122365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122365 Mahmoudi A, Javed SA, Mardani A (2021) Gresilient supplier selection through Fuzzy Ordinal Priority Approach: decision-making in post-COVID era. Oper Manag Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00178-z Mardani A, Jusoh A, Halicka K, Ejdys J, Magruk A, Ungku UN (2018) Determining the utility in management by using multi-criteria decision support tools: A review. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 31(1):1666–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1488600 Mardani A, Nilashi M, Zakuan N, Loganathan N, Soheilirad S, Saman MZM, Ibrahim O (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments. Appl Soft Comput 57:265–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.045 Mardani A, Saraji MK, Mishra AR, Rani P (2020) A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak. Appl Soft Comput 96:106613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106613 Mousavi-Nasab SH, Sotoudeh-Anvari A (2017) A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems. Mater Des 121:237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.041 Musaad OAS, Zhuo Z, Musaad O AO, Ali Siyal Z, Hashmi H, Shah SA (2020) A fuzzy multi-criteria analysis of barriers and policy strategies for small and medium enterprises to adopt green innovation. Symmetry 12(1):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12010116 Namdari A, Li Z (2019) A review of entropy measures for uncertainty quantification of stochastic processes. Adv Mech Eng 11(6):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019857350 Narayanamoorthy S, Ramya L, Kalaiselvan S, Kureethara JV, Kang D (2021) Use of DEMATEL and COPRAS method to select best alternative fuel for control of impact of greenhouse gas emissions. Socioecon Plann Sci 76:100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100996 Omerali M, Kaya T (2022) Augmented reality application selection framework using spherical fuzzy COPRAS multi criteria decision making. Cogent Eng 9(1):2020610 Ozkan-Ozen YD, Kazancoglu Y, Mangla SK (2020) Synchronized barriers for circular supply chains in industry 3.5/industry 4.0 transition for sustainable resource management. Resour Conserv Recycl 161:104986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104986 Pan B, Liu S, Xie Z, Shao Y, Li X, Ge R (2021) Evaluating operational features of three unconventional intersections under heavy traffic based on CRITIC method. Sustainability 13(8):4098 Peng X, Huang H (2020) Fuzzy decision making method based on CoCoSo with critic for financial risk evaluation. Technol Econ Dev Econ 26(4):695–724. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.11920 Peng X, Zhang X, Luo Z (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09780-x Puška A, Nedeljković M, Prodanović R, Vladisavljević R, Suzić R (2022) Market assessment of pear varieties in Serbia using fuzzy CRADIS and CRITIC methods. Agriculture 12(2):139 Rani P, Ali J, Krishankumar R, Mishra AR, Cavallaro F, Ravichandran KS (2021a) An integrated single-valued neutrosophic combined resource selection problem. Energies 1–23 Rani P, Mishra AR, Krishankumar R, Mardani A, Cavallaro F, Ravichandran KS, Karthikeyan B (2020) Hesitant fuzzy SWARA-complex proportional assessment approach for sustainable supplier (HF-SWARA-COPRAS). Symmetry 1–19 Rani P, Mishra AR, Krishankumar R, Ravichandran KS, Kar S (2021b) Multi-criteria food waste treatment method selection using single-valued neutrosophic-CRITIC-MULTIMOORA framework. Appl Soft Comput 111:107657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107657 Rostamzadeh R, Ghorabaee MK, Govindan K, Esmaeili A, Nobar HBK (2018) Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS- CRITIC approach. J Clean Prod 175:651–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.071 Roy J, Sharma HK, Kar S, Zavadskas EK, Saparauskas J (2019) An extended COPRAS model for multi-criteria decision-making problems and its application in web-based hotel evaluation and selection. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 32(1):219–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1543054 Saraji MK, Streimikiene D (2021) Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS method for evaluating the challenges to industry 4.0 adoption for a sustainable digital transformation. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13:1–20m Sauvé S, Bernard S, Sloan P (2016) Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environ Dev 17:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002 Singh PK, Sarkar P (2019) A framework based on fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for prioritizing solutions to overcome the barriers in the implementation of ecodesign practices in SMEs. Int J Sust Dev World 26(6):506–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1605547 Sivagami R, Ravichandran KS, Krishankumar R, Sangeetha V, Kar S, Gao XZ, Pamucar D (2019) A scientific decision framework for cloud vendor prioritization under probabilistic linguistic term set context with unknown/partialweight information. Symmetry 11(5):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050682 Solangi YA, Longsheng C, Shah SAA (2021) Assessing and overcoming the renewable energy barriers for sustainable development in Pakistan: An integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Renew Energy 173:209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.141 Song W, Zhu Y, Zhao Q (2020) Analyzing barriers for adopting sustainable online consumption: A rough hierarchical DEMATEL method. Comput Ind Eng 140(37):106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106279 Suárez-Eiroa B, Fernández E, Méndez-Martínez G, Soto-Oñate D (2019) Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. J Clean Prod 214:952–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271 Thangavelu S, Gunasekar S, Jyotishi A (2021) Feedback effects of economic growth on innovation: a country-level empirical study. J Sci Technol Policy Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-09-2020-0144 Turskis Z, Goranin N, Nurusheva A, Boranbayev S (2019) A fuzzy WASPAS-based approach to determine critical information infrastructures of EU sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020424 Valipour A, Yahaya N, Md Noor N, Antuchevičienė J, Tamošaitienė J (2017) Hybrid SWARA-COPRAS method for risk assessment in deep foundation excavation project: an Iranian case study. J Civ Eng Manag 23(4):524–532. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1281842 Vishwakarma V, Garg CP, Barua MK (2019) Modelling the barriers of Indian pharmaceutical supply chain using fuzzy AHP. Int J Oper Res 34(2):240–268 Wang X, He L, Zhu K, Zhang S, Xin L, Xu W, Guan Y (2019) An integrated model to evaluate the impact of social support on improving self-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19(1):1–12 Wei G, Lei F, Lin R, Wang R, Wei Y, Wu J, Wei C (2020) Algorithms for probabilistic uncertain linguistic multiple attribute group decision making based on the GRA and CRITIC method: application to location planning of electric vehicle charging stations. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 33(1):828–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1734851 Wei G, Wu J, Guo Y, Wang J, Wei C (2021) An extended copras model for multiple attribute group decision making based on single-valued neutrosophic 2-tuple linguistic environment. Technol Econ Dev Econ 27(2):353–368. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14057 Wu HW, Zhen J, Zhang J (2020) Urban rail transit operation safety evaluation based on an improved CRITIC method and cloud model. J Rail Transp Plan Manag 16(3):100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2020.100206 Xu Y, Yeh CH, Liu CG, Ramzan S, Zhang L (2021) Evaluating and managing interactive barriers for sustainable e-waste management in China. J Oper Res Soc 72(9):2018–2031. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1759381 Yazdani M, Pamucar D, Chatterjee P, Torkayesh AE (2021) A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty. Oper Manag Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00186-z Zadeh LA (2004) Fuzzy logic systems: origin, concepts, and trends. Science 80:16–18. http://www-bisc.cs.berkeley.edu Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A, Sarka V (1994) The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technol Econ Dev Econ 1(3):131–139 Zhao M, Wang X, Yu J, Xue L, Yang S (2020) A construction schedule robustness measure based on improved prospect theory and the Copula-CRITIC method. Appl Sci 10(6):2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10062013 Zheng Y, Xu Z, He Y, Liao H (2018) Severity assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic COPRAS method. Appl Soft Comput 69:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.035 Zolfani SH, Pourhossein M, Yazdani M, Zavadskas EK (2018) Evaluating construction projects of hotels based on environmental sustainability with MCDM framework. Alex Eng J 57(1):357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.11.002