An exploration of contextually relevant curricula in international social work education: learning from the experiences of selected Asian countries
Tóm tắt
Current global uncertainties such as increasing socio-economic and political difficulties have amplified the significance of researching the nature of international social work education. This pilot study collaboratively investigated the educational characteristics of international social work curricula in Asia to identify the prevailing conditions related to this discipline. Data were collected in February 2023 at an international academic forum that included presentations delivered by researchers from five Asian countries. An exploratory and qualitative-descriptive analysis was performed to identify the contexts and contents of curricula related to international social work. The study findings elucidated the need to explore curricula that may differ from mainstream syllabi taught in international social work education programmes in Western countries. The findings of this study underscore the importance of dialogic processes and continual collaborative research projects.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Healy LM. The international dimension in social work education: current efforts, future challenges. Int Soc Work. 1986;29:135–47.
Healy LM, Thomas RL. International social work: professional action in an interdependent world (3rd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021.
Akimoto T. The globalization of western-rooted professional social work and exploration of Buddhist social work. In: Gohori J, editor. From western-rooted professional social work to Buddhist social work: exploring Buddhist social work. Tokyo: Gakubunsha; 2017. p. 1–41.
Gray M. ‘Think globally and locally, act globally and locally’: a new agenda for international social work education. In: Taylor I, Bogo M, Lefevre M, Teater B, editors. Routledge international handbook of social work education. Routledge; 2016. p. 3–13.
Hugman R. Decolonising international social work. In: Webb SA, editor. The Routledge handbook of international critical social work: new perspectives and agendas. Routledge; 2022. p. 449–61.
IFSW & IASSW. Global definition of the social work profession. 2014. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/.
Higashida M. An inductive content analysis of international social welfare syllabi at national and public universities in Japan: towards a glocal subject design. Soc Work Educ. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2022.2107194.
Hunter D, McCallum J, Howes D. Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Nurs Health Care 2019;4.
Higashida M, Ranaweera A, Herath C. Exploring the social representations of social work in the Sri Lankan cultural context: a qualitative study. Sustainability. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316197.
Midgley J. Promoting reciprocal international social work exchanges: professional imperialism revisited. In: Coates J, editor. Indigenous social work around the world: towards culturally relevant education and practice. London: Routledge; 2010. p. 31–45.
Higashida M, Matsuo K, Gohori J. Integrating indigenous perspectives into international social work education: a case study in Japan. In: Kosutab M, Rajendra B, Ashok D, editors. Indigenization discourse in social work. Springer: International perspectives; 2023.
Cox D, Pawar M. International social work: issues, strategies, and programs. New Delhi: Sage; 2006.