An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis

Wiley - Tập 58 Số 10 - Trang 2958-2967 - 2008
Andrew K. Brown1, Philip G. Conaghan2, Z Karim2, Mark Quinn2, Kei Ikeda2, Charles Peterfy3, E. Hensor2, Richard J. Wakefield2, Philip O’Connor4, Paul Emery2
1Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, and Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
2University of Leeds and Chapel Allerton Hospital; Leeds; UK
3Synarc Inc., San Francisco, California
4 Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, #N#UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectiveAchieving remission is the aim of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This should represent minimal arthritis activity and ensure optimal disease outcome. However, we have previously demonstrated a high prevalence of imaging‐detected synovial inflammation in RA patients who were in clinical remission. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long‐term significance of subclinical synovitis and its relationship to structural outcome.MethodsWe studied 102 RA patients receiving conventional treatment who had been judged by their consultant rheumatologist to be in remission, as well as 17 normal control subjects. Subjects underwent clinical, laboratory, functional, and quality of life assessments over 12 months. In addition to standard radiography of the hands and feet, imaging of the hands and wrists was performed with musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) and conventional 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 12 months, using validated acquisition and scoring techniques.ResultsDespite their being in clinical remission, 19% of the patients displayed deterioration in radiographic joint damage over the study period. Scores on musculoskeletal US synovial hypertrophy, power Doppler (PD), and MRI synovitis assessments in individual joints at baseline were significantly associated with progressive radiographic damage (P = 0.032, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Furthermore, there was a significant association between the musculoskeletal US PD score at baseline and structural progression over 12 months in totally asymptomatic metacarpophalangeal joints (P = 0.004) and 12 times higher odds of deterioration in joints with increased PD signal (odds ratio 12.21, P < 0.001).ConclusionSubclinical joint inflammation detected by imaging techniques explains the structural deterioration in RA patients in clinical remission who are receiving conventional therapy. Our findings reinforce the utility of imaging for the accurate evaluation of disease status and the prediction of structural outcome.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1136/ard.54.12.944

10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01300-7

10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15640-7

10.1002/art.20351

10.1093/rheumatology/35.12.1263

10.1002/art.11481

10.1002/art.11496

10.1002/art.1780241012

10.1136/ard.49.11.916

10.1002/art.1780380107

Paulus HE, 2004, Defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis: what is it? Does it matter?, J Rheumatol, 31, 1

10.1002/art.22190

10.1002/art.1780310302

10.1002/art.1780230202

10.1093/rheumatology/36.8.878

10.1002/1529-0131(199809)41:9<1583::AID-ART8>3.0.CO;2-H

10.1136/ard.60.7.641

Wakefield RJ, 2005, Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology, J Rheumatol, 32, 2485

10.1002/art.20054

10.1136/ard.2003.007062

10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596870

10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2762::AID-ANR16>3.0.CO;2-#

Ostergaard M, 2003, OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies: core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA‐MRI scoring system, J Rheumatol, 30, 1385

10.1348/014466506X96931

10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

10.1136/ard.2003.018457

10.1002/1529-0131(199905)42:5<918::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO;2-2

10.1002/art.10747

10.1002/art.22496

10.1002/art.11162

10.1136/ard.2003.011544

10.1136/ard.61.10.895

10.1002/art.11076

Conaghan PG, 2005, The evidence for magnetic resonance imaging as an outcome measure in proof‐of‐concept rheumatoid arthritis studies, J Rheumatol, 32, 2465

10.1186/ar1995

10.1002/art.20135