An examination of digital empathy: When farmers speak for the climate through TikTok

Anderson, 2020, Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: it is time to talk about TikTok, Libr. Hi Tech News, 37, 7, 10.1108/LHTN-01-2020-0001 Azman, 2021, Acceptance of TikTok on the youth towards education development, Borneo International Journal eISSN 2636-9826, 4, 19 Basch, 2022, # Climate change on TikTok: a content analysis of videos, J. Community Health, 1 Bavorová, 2020, How sources of agriculture information shape the adoption of reduced tillage practices?, J. Rural Stud., 79, 88, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.034 Berenguer, 2007, The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors, Environ. Behav., 39, 269, 10.1177/0013916506292937 Bhandari, 2022, Why's everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media, Social Media+ Society, 8 Bloomfield, 2022, Strategies for climate change post COP26, Polit. Q., 93, 278, 10.1111/1467-923X.13125 Bloomfield, 2020, The effects of establishing intimacy and consubstantiality on group discussions about climate change solutions, Sci. Commun., 42, 369, 10.1177/1075547020927017 Boykoff, 2011 Boykoff, 2019, A laughing matter? Confronting climate change through humor, Polit. Geogr., 68, 154, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.09.006 Boykoff, 2022 Brennan, 2022, From regiments and radicals: the critical need for empowering youth as radical agents of change, Educ. Citizen Soc. Justice, 17, 210, 10.1177/17461979221103775 Brownlie, 2019, Empathy rituals: small conversations about emotional distress on Twitter, Sociology, 53, 104, 10.1177/0038038518767075 Bruce, 2019, Farm entry and persistence: three pathways into alternative agriculture in southern Ohio, J. Rural Stud., 69, 30, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.007 Chang, 2022, Environmental discourse exhibits consistency and variation across spatial scales on twitter, Bioscience, 72, 789, 10.1093/biosci/biac051 Chapman, 2017, Reassessing emotion in climate change communication, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 850, 10.1038/s41558-017-0021-9 Chen, 2018, Developing EFL students' digital empathy through video production, System, 77, 50, 10.1016/j.system.2018.01.006 Clair, 2004, Playing the grim reaper: how employees experience carrying out a downsizing, Human relations, 57, 1597, 10.1177/0018726704049991 Crippa, 2021, Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, Nature Food, 2, 198, 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9 Colvin, 2020, Learning from the climate change debate to avoid polarisation on negative emissions, Environmental Communication, 14, 23, 10.1080/17524032.2019.1630463 Conner, 2021 Daiute, 2013 Davis, 1980, A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy, JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85 Deri, 2018, Coloring in the links: capturing social ties as they are perceived, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1, 10.1145/3274312 Ettinger, 2023, Breaking the climate spiral of silence: lessons from a COP26 climate conversations campaign, Climatic Change, 176, 22, 10.1007/s10584-023-03493-5 Ettinger, 2021, Climate of hope or doom and gloom? Testing the climate change hope vs. fear communications debate through online videos, Climatic Change, 164, 19, 10.1007/s10584-021-02975-8 Fiala, 2021, Environmentally sound agriculture between transformation and conformation: the changing portrayal of the growing organic farming movement in Austria's newspaper coverage, Environmental Communication, 15, 495, 10.1080/17524032.2020.1866636 Friesem, 2016, Empathy for the digital age: using video production to enhance social, emotional, and cognitive skills, Emotions, technology, and behaviors, 21, 10.1016/B978-0-12-801873-6.00002-9 Getson, 2022, Understanding scientists' communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture, PLoS One, 17, 10.1371/journal.pone.0269927 Geiger, 2016, Climate of silence: pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion, J. Environ. Psychol., 47, 79, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002 Habibi, 2021, Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: a critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media, PLoS One, 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0248507 Hale, 2020, Posting about cancer: predicting social support in Imgur comments, Social Media+ Society, 6, 1 Hatfield, 2011, Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production, Agronomy journal, 103, 351, 10.2134/agronj2010.0303 Hautea, 2021, Showing they care (or don't): affective publics and ambivalent climate activism on TikTok, Social media+ society, 7, 1 Hayhoe, 2021 Hobson, 2013, What sceptics believe”: the effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism, Publ. Understand. Sci., 22, 396, 10.1177/0963662511430459 Kaltenbacher, 2020, An inconvenient joke? A review of humor in climate change communication, Environmental Communication, 14, 717, 10.1080/17524032.2020.1756888 Kovacheva, 2022, Online engagement with memes and comments about climate change, Sustainability, 14, 8900, 10.3390/su14148900 Kozinets, 2021 Liu, 2021, Social media and climate change dialogue: A review of the research and guidance for science communicators, 97 Lovell, 2022, Examining public organization communication misalignments during COVID-19 through the lens of higher education, Adm. Soc., 54, 212, 10.1177/00953997211026949 Masambuka-Kanchewa, 2021, Exploring differences in communication behaviors between organic and conventional farmers, J Agri Food Sys Comm Dev, 10, 205 Matarrita-Cascante, 2012, Conceptualizing community development in the twenty-frist century, J. Vocat. Technol. Educ., 43, 293 Manzo, 2012, Earthworks: the geopolitical visions of climate change cartoons, Polit. Geogr., 31, 481, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.09.001 Meijers, 2019, Using visual impact metaphors to stimulate environmentally friendly behavior: the roles of response efficacy and evaluative persuasion knowledge, Environmental Communication, 13, 995, 10.1080/17524032.2018.1544160 Moernaut, 2022, Hot weather, hot topic. Polarization and sceptical framing in the climate debate on Twitter, Inf. Commun. Soc., 25, 1047, 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1834600 Moret-Soler, 2022, Incendiary humor: climate change, biodiversity, and politics in wildfire cartoons, Environmental Communication, 16, 296, 10.1080/17524032.2021.2000466 McBeth, 2022, Narrative empathy: a narrative policy framework study of working-class climate change narratives and narrators, World Aff., 185, 471, 10.1177/00438200221107018 Odera, 2022, Enhancing research and practice: understanding paths and options for youth citizenship and social justice, Educ. Citizen Soc. Justice, 17, 224, 10.1177/17461979221077983 Olausson, 2018, Stop blaming the cows!”: how livestock production is legitimized in everyday discourse on Facebook, Environmental Communication, 12, 28, 10.1080/17524032.2017.1406385 Park, 2021, Analysis of ageism, sexism, and ableism in user comments on YouTube videos about climate activist Greta Thunberg, Social Media+ Society, 7, 1 Pearce, 2019, The social media life of climate change: platforms, publics, and future imaginaries, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Clim. Change, 10 Petril'ák, 2020, Communication of local farmers' products through Facebook: the case study of Nase-vase, Commun. Today, 11, 150 Radin, 2022, TikTok: an emergent opportunity for teaching and learning science communication online, J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., 23, 10.1128/jmbe.00236-21 Ramsey, 2021 Ravishankar, 2021, Social innovations and the fight against poverty: an analysis of India's first prosocial P2P lending platform, Inf. Syst. J., 31, 745, 10.1111/isj.12340 Redden, 2017, ‘Adults don't understand’: exploring how teens use dialectical frameworks to navigate webs of tensions in online life, J. Appl. Commun. Res., 45, 21, 10.1080/00909882.2016.1248465 Riley, 2021, # farming365–Exploring farmers' social media use and the (re) presentation of farming lives, J. Rural Stud., 87, 99, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.08.028 Riley, 2022, The virtual good farmer: farmers' use of social media and the (re) presentation of “good farming”, Sociol. Rural., 62, 437, 10.1111/soru.12390 Rotz, 2018, Drawing lines in the cornfield: an analysis of discourse and identity relations across agri-food networks, Agric. Hum. Val., 35, 441, 10.1007/s10460-017-9838-0 Russell, 2023, Humour and environmental education, Environ. Educ. Res., 29, 491, 10.1080/13504622.2023.2183845 Saldaña, 2021 Sanford, 2023, Emotional framing in online environmental activism: pairing a Twitter study with an offline experiment, Front. Psychol., 13, 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1099331 Sharma, 2021, April. Towards facilitating empathic conversations in online mental health support: a reinforcement learning approach, 194 Sharma, 2020, A computational approach to understanding empathy expressed in text-based mental health support, 5263 Sorvali, 2021, Farmer views on climate change—a longitudinal study of threats, opportunities and action, Climatic Change, 164, 1, 10.1007/s10584-021-03020-4 Sperandeo, 2021, Exploring the question:“Does empathy work in the same way in online and in-person therapeutic settings?”, Front. Psychol., 12, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671790 Stevens, 2016, Social media as a new playing field for the governance of agro-food sustainability, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 18, 99, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.010 Stevens, 2018, Social media hypes about agro-food issues: activism, scandals and conflicts, Food Pol., 79, 23, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.009 Swim, 2015, Portraying the perils to polar bears: the role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication, Environmental Communication, 9, 446, 10.1080/17524032.2014.987304 Tam, 2013, Dispositional empathy with nature, J. Environ. Psychol., 35, 92, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.004 Tan, 2022, The potential of TikTok's key features as a pedagogical strategy for ESL classrooms, Sustainability, 14, 10.3390/su142416876 Telg, 2020, Engaging in conversations about climate change with cattle producers, J Human Sci Ex, 8, 3 Terry, 2016, The emerging issue of digital empathy, Am. J. Pharmaceut. Educ., 80 Thornberg, 2014, Grounded theory and theoretical coding, The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 5, 153, 10.4135/9781446282243.n11 Topp, 2019, The role of entertainment in engagement with climate change, Environ. Educ. Res., 25, 691, 10.1080/13504622.2019.1572072 Tuitjer, 2022, Geographies of climate change opinion, Geo Com, 16 Unay-Gailhard, 2021, Gender and the environmental concerns of young farmers: do young women farmers make a difference on family farms?, J. Rural Stud., 88, 71, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.027 Unay-Gailhard, 2022, Becoming a young farmer in the digital age—an island perspective, Rural Sociol., 87, 144, 10.1111/ruso.12400 Unay-Gailhard, 2023, Young farmers in “The New World of Work”: the contribution of new media to the work engagement and professional identities, Rural Sociol., 88, 426, 10.1111/ruso.12481 van der Ploeg, 2020, Farmers’ upheaval, climate crisis and populism, J. Peasant Stud., 47, 589, 10.1080/03066150.2020.1725490 van Swol, 2022, Fostering climate change consensus: the role of intimacy in group discussions, Publ. Understand. Sci., 31, 103, 10.1177/09636625211020661 Wambsganss, 2021, Supporting cognitive and emotional empathic writing of students, ume 1 Wilke, 2015, Climatologists' communication of climate science to the agricultural sector, Sci. Commun., 37, 371, 10.1177/1075547015581927 Xu, 2021, Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods, Nature Food, 2, 724, 10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x Zawacki, 2022, Exploring TikTok as a promising platform for geoscience communication, Geosci Comm, 5, 363, 10.5194/gc-5-363-2022 Zhou, 2020, Condolence and empathy in online communities, 609