An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adler, J. E. (1991). An optimist’s pessimism: Conversation and conjunctions. In E. Eells & T. Maruszewski (Eds.),Probability and rationality: Studies on L. Jonathan Cohen’s philosophy of science (pp. 251–282). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Agnoli, F., &Krantz, D. H. (1989). Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy.Cognitive Psychology,21, 515–550.
Anderson, J. R. (1993).Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R. (1995).Learning and memory. New York: Wiley.
Anderson, J. R., &Betz, J. (2001). A hybrid model of categorization.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 629–647.
Anderson, J. R., &Douglass, S. (2001). Tower of Hanoi: Evidence for the cost of goal retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1331–1346.
Anderson, J. R., &Sheu, C. F. (1995). Causal inferences as perceptual judgments.Memory & Cognition,23, 510–524.
Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., &Damasio, A. R. (1999). Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex.Nature Neuroscience,2, 1032–1037.
Ball, L. J., Lucas, E. J., Miles, J. N. V., &Gale, A. G. (2003). Inspection times and the selection task: What do eye-movements reveal about relevance effects?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 1052–1077.
Benassi, V. A., &Knoth, R. L. (1993). The intractable conjunction fallacy: Statistical sophistication, instructional set, and training.Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,8, 83–96.
Berry, D. (1983). Metacognitive experience and transfer of logical reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 39–40.
Berry, D. (1991). The role of action in implicit learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43, 881–906.
Berry, D., &Dienes, Z. (1993).Implicit learning. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Betsch, T., &Fiedler, K. (1999). Understanding conjunction effects in probability judgments: The role of implicit mental models.European Journal of Social Psychology,29, 75–93.
Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,18, 227–287.
Braine, M. D. S., &O’Brien, D. P. (1998). The theory of mental propositional logic: Description and illustration. In M. D. S. Braine & D. P. O’Brien (Eds.),Mental logic (pp. 79–89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brase, G. L., Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J. (1998). Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 3–21.
Bucciarelli, M. (2000). Reasoning strategies in syllogisms: Evidence for performance errors along with computational limitations.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 669–670.
Bucciarelli, M., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Strategies in syllogistic reasoning.Cognitive Science,23, 247–303.
Burns, B. D., &Vollmeyer, R. (2002). Goal specificity effects on hypothesis testing in problem solving.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 241–261.
Ceci, S. J., &Liker, J. K. (1986). A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 255–266.
Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 387–395.
Cheng P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., &Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,18, 293–328.
Chrostowski, J. J., &Griggs, R. A. (1985). The effects of problem content, instructions, and verbalization procedure on Wason’s selection task.Current Psychological Research & Reviews,4, 99–107.
Cleeremans, A. (1997). Principles for implicit learning. In D. Berry (Ed.),How implicit is implicit learning? New York: Oxford University Press.
Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., &Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 406–416.
Cleeremans, A., &Jiménez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamical perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.),Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (pp. 1–40). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,4, 317–370.
Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty.Cognition,58, 1–73.
Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J. (2000). Consider the source: The evolution of adaptations for decoupling and metarepresentations. In D. Sperber (Ed.),Metarepresentation: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 53–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crabb, B. T., &Dark, V. J. (1999). Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding.Memory & Cognition,27, 267–275.
Crandall, C. S., &Greenfield, B. (1986). Understanding the conjunction fallacy: A conjunction of effects?Social Cognition,4, 408–419.
Dawkins, R. (1976).The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
Deglin, V. L., &Kinsbourne, M. (1996). Divergent thinking styles of the hemispheres: How syllogisms are solved during transitory hemisphere suppression.Brain & Cognition,31, 285–307.
Dienes, Z., &Fahey, R. (1998). The role of implicit memory in controlling a dynamic system.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 593–614.
Dienes, Z., &Perner, J. (2003). Unifying consciousness with explicit knowledge. In A. Cleeremans (Ed.),The unity of consciousness: Binding, integration, and dissociation (pp. 214–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon, J. A., &Moore, C. F. (1997). Characterizing the intuitive representation in problem solving: Evidence from evaluating mathematical strategies.Memory & Cognition,25, 395–412.
Dudley, R. E. J., John, C. H., Young, A. W., &Over, D. E. (1997). Normal and abnormal reasoning in people with delusions.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,36, 243–258.
Dulany, D. E. (1991). Conscious representation and thought systems. In R. S.Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.),The content, structure, and operation of thought systems (pp. 97–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dulany, D. E., &Hilton, D. J. (1991). Conversational implicature, conscious representation, and the conjunction fallacy.Social Cognition,9, 85–110.
Dunwoody, P. T., Haarbauer, E., Mahan, R. P., Marino, C., &Tang, C. C. (2000). Cognitive adaptation and its consequences: A test of cognitive continuum theory.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,13, 35–54.
Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory.American Psychologist,28, 404–416.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious.American Psychologist,49, 709–724.
Epstein, S., Donovan, S., &Denes-Raj, V. (1999). The missing link in the paradox of the Linda conjunction problem: Beyond knowing and thinking of the conjunction rule, the intrinsic appeal of heuristic processing.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,25, 204–214.
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., &Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,71, 390–405.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., &Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.Psychological Review,100, 363–406.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1972). Interpretation and “matching bias” in a reasoning task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,24, 193–199.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning.British Journal of Psychology,75, 451–468.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1989).Biases in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. London: Erlbaum.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1995). Relevance and reasoning. In S. E. Newstead & J. S. B. T. Evans (Eds.),Perspectives on thinking and reasoning (pp. 147–172). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1996). Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task.British Journal of Psychology,87, 223–240.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1998). Matching bias in conditional reasoning: Do we understand it after 25 years?Thinking & Reasoning,4, 45–82.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2000). What could and could not be a strategy in reasoning. In W. Schaeken, D. DeVooght, & A. D. D. Vandierendonck (Eds.),Deductive reasoning and strategies (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2002). Logical and human reasoning: An assessment of the deductive paradigm.Psychological Bulletin,128, 978–996.
Evans, J. S. B. T., Ball, L. J., &Brooks, P. G. (1987). Attention bias and decision order in a reasoning task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 811–814.
Evans, J. S. B. T., Barston, J. L., &Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition,11, 295–306.
Evans, J. S. B. T., &Over, D. E. (1996).Rationality and reasoning. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Evans, J. S. B. T., &Pollard, P. (1990). Belief bias and problem complexity in deductive reasoning. In J.-P. Caverni, J.-M. Fabrś, & M. Gonzalez (Eds.),Cognitive biases (pp. 131–154). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Evans, J. S. B. T., &Wason, P. C. (1976). Rationalisation in a reasoning task.British Journal of Psychology,63, 205–212.
Farah, M. J. (1994). Visual perception and visual awareness after brain damage: A tutorial overview. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 37–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Farah, M. J., Monheit, M. A., &Wallace, M. A. (1991). Unconscious perception of “extinguished” visual stimuli: Reassessing the evidence.Neuropsychologia,29, 949–958.
Farah, M. J., O’Reilly, R. C., &Vecera, S. P. (1993). Dissociated overt and covert recognition as an emergent property of lesioned attractor networks.Psychological Review,100, 571–588.
Fiddick, L., Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J. (2000). No interpretation without representation: The role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task.Cognition,77, 1–79.
Fiedler, K. (1988). The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors.Psychological Research,50, 123–129.
Fillenbaum, S. (1976). Inducements: On the phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats, and warnings.Psychological Research,38, 231–250.
Fisk, J. E., &Pidgeon, N. (1996). Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low component model in a contingent approach.Acta Psychologica,94, 1–20.
Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H., &Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems.Cognitive Psychology,18, 253–292.
Fong, G. T., &Nisbett, R. E. (1991). Immediate and delayed transfer of training effects in statistical reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 34–45.
Ford, M. (1995). Two modes of mental representation and problem solution in syllogistic reasoning.Cognition,54, 1–71.
Freud, S. (1953). The interpretation of dreams. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.),The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vols. 4 and 5). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1900)
Galotti, K. M., Baron, J., &Sabini, J. P. (1986). Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: Deduction rules or mental models?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 16–25.
Geddes, B. W., &Stevenson, R. J. (1997). Explicit learning of a dynamic system with a non-salient pattern.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 742–765.
Gigerenzer, G., &Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Psychological Review,102, 684–704.
Gilinsky, A. S., &Judd, B. B. (1994). Working memory and bias in reasoning across the life span.Psychology & Aging,9, 356–371.
Goel, V., Buchel, C., Frith, C., &Dolan, R. J. (2000). Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning.NeuroImage,12, 504–514.
Goel, V., &Dolan, R. J. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of threeterm relational reasoning.Neuropsychologia,39, 901–909.
Goel, V., Gold, B., Kapur, S., &Houle, S. (1997). The seats of reason: A localization study of deductive & inductive reasoning using PET (O15) blood flow technique.NeuroReport,8, 1305–1310.
Green, D. W., &Larking, R. (1995). The locus of facilitation in the abstract selection task.Thinking & Reasoning,1, 183–199.
Griggs, R. A., &Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effects in Wason’s selection task.British Journal of Psychology,73, 407–420.
Hawkins, J., Pea, R. D., Glick, J., &Scribner, S. (1984). “Merds that laugh don’t like mushrooms”: Evidence for deductive reasoning by preschoolers. {Developmental Psychology},20, 584–594.
Hayes, N., &Broadbent, D. E. (1988). Two modes of learning for interactive tasks.Cognition,28, 249–276.
Hertwig, R., Ortmann, A., &Gigerenzer, G. (1997). Deductive competence: A desert devoid of content and context.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive,16, 102–107.
Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inferences and rational judgment.Psychological Review,118, 248–271.
Hoch, S. J., &Tschirgi, J. E. (1983). Cue redundancy and extra logical inferences in a deductive reasoning task.Memory & Cognition,11, 200–209.
Hoch, S. J., &Tschirgi, J. E. (1985). Logical knowledge and cue redundancy in deductive reasoning.Memory & Cognition,13, 453–462.
Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious activation in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 1–66.
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., &Thagard, P. R. (1989).Induction: Processes of inference, learning and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Houde, O., Zago, L., Crivello, F., Moutier, S., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B., &Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2001). Access to deductive logic depends on a right ventromedial prefrontal area devoted to emotion and feeling: Evidence from a training paradigm.NeuroImage,14, 1486–1492.
Huq, S. F., Garety, P. A., &Hemsley, D. R. (1988). Probabilistic judgements in deluded and non-deluded subjects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 801–812.
Jacoby, L. L., Levy, B. A., &Steinbach, K. (1992). Episodic transfer and automaticity: Integration of data-driven and conceptually driven processing in rereading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 15–24.
James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Wason, P. C. (1970). A theoretical analysis of insight into a reasoning task.Cognitive Psychology,1, 134–148.
Kahneman, D., &Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.),Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data.Cognition,23, 95–147.
Karnath, H. O. (1988). Deficits in attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect.Neuropsychologia,26, 27–43.
Kemp, R., Chua, S., McKenna, P., &David, A. (1997). Reasoning and delusions.British Journal of Psychiatry,170, 398–405.
Kirby, K. N. (1994). Probabilities and utilities of fictional outcomes in Wason’s four-card selection task.Cognition,5, 1–28.
Klaczynski, P. A. (2001). Analytical and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision making.Child Development,72, 844–861.
Klaczynski, P. A., Gelfand, H., &Reese, H. W. (1989). Transfer of conditional reasoning: Effects of explanations and initial problem types.Memory & Cognition,17, 208–220.
Klaczynski, P. A., Gordon, D. H., &Fauth, J. (1996). Goal-oriented reasoning and individual differences in critical reasoning biases.Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 470–485.
Klayman, J., &Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation and information in hypothesis testing.Psychological Review,94, 211–228.
Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R., &Greenlee, M. W. (2002). Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI study.Cognitive Brain Research,13, 203–212.
Koehler, J. J. (1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative and methodological challenges.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,19, 1–53.
Kunimoto, C., Miller, J., &Pashler, H. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.Consciousness & Cognition,10, 294–340.
Levinson, S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (Ed.),Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 221–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacDonald, P., &MacLeod, C. M. (1998). The influence of attention at encoding on direct and indirect remembering.Acta Psychologica,98, 298–310.
Manktelow, K. I., &Over, D. E. (1995). Deontic reasoning. In S. E. Newstead & J. S. B. T. Evans (Eds.),Perspectives on thinking and reasoning (pp. 91–114). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Margolis, H. (1987).Patterns, thinking, and cognition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Margolis, H. (2000). Wason’s selection task with a reduced array [On line]. {Psycoloquy},11 (5).
Markovits, H., &Nantel, G. (1989). The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions.Memory & Cognition,17, 11–17.
Markus, H., &Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
Mathis, W. D., & Mozer, M. C. (1996, July).Conscious and unconscious perception: A computational theory. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, San Diego.
Meier, B., &Perrig, W. J. (2000). Low reliability of perceptual priming: Consequences for the interpretation of functional dissociations between explicit and implicit memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 211–233.
Morier, D. M., &Borgida, E. (1984). The conjunction fallacy: A task specific phenomenon?Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,10, 243–252.
Moshman, D. (1999).Adolescent psychological development: Rationality, morality, and identity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Moshman, D. (2000). Diversity in reasoning and rationality: Metacognitive and developmental considerations.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 689–690.
Newstead, S. E. (2000). Are there two different types of thinking?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 690–691.
Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J., Harley, C., Wright, H., &Farrelly, D. (2004). Individual differences in deductive reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 33–60.
Newstead, S. E., Pollard, P., Evans, J. S. B. T., &Allen, J. L. (1992). The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning.Cognition,45, 257–284.
Newstead, S. E., Thompson, V. A., &Handley, S. J. (2002). Generating alternatives: A key component in human reasoning?Memory & Cognition,30, 129–137.
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., &Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning.Psychological Review,90, 339–363.
Nisbett, R. E., &Ross, L. (1980).Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nisbett, R. E., &Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review,84, 231–259.
Oakhill, J., Garnham, A., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1990). Belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning. In K. J. Gilhooly, M. T. G. Keane, R. H. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.),Lines of thinking: Reflections on the psychology of thought (pp. 125–139). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Oakhill, J., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). The effects of belief bias on the production of syllogistic conclusions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 553–569.
O’Brien, G., &Opie, J. (1999). A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 127–196.
O’Reilly, R. C., &Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Osherson, D., Perani, D., Cappa, S., Schnur, T., Grassi, F., &Fazio, F. (1998). Distinct brain loci in deductive versus probabilistic reasoning.Neuropsychologia,36, 369–376.
Osman, M. (2002, August).Is there evidence for unconscious reasoning processes? Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, DC.
Osman, M., &Laming, D. (2001). Misinterpretation of conditional statements in Wason’s selection task.Psychological Research,65, 128–144.
Over, D., &Evans, J. S. B. T. (1997). Two cheers for deductive competence.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 255–278.
Pacini, R., &Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,76, 972–987.
Parsons, L. M., &Osherson, D. (2001). New evidence for distinct right and left brain systems for deductive versus probabilistic reasoning.Cerebral Cortex,11, 954–965.
Perruchet, P., &Baveux, P. (1989). Correlational analyses of explicit and implicit memory performance.Memory & Cognition,17, 77–86.
Perruchet, P., &Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organising consciousness: A framework for implicit learning. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.),Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (pp. 41–67). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Platt, R. D., &Griggs, R.A. (1995). Facilitation and matching bias in the abstract selection task.Thinking & Reasoning,1, 55–77.
Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology,118, 219–235.
Reber, A. S. (1993).Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reber, P. J., &Kotovsky, K. (1997). Implicit learning in problem solving: The role of working memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 178–203.
Reeves, T., &Lockhart, R. S. (1993). Distributed versus singular approaches to probability and errors in probabilistic reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 207–226.
Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., &Stampe, D. M. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: Evidence from eye movements.Psychological Science,12, 48–55.
Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Schultetus, R. S., &Stampe, D. M. (2001). Perceptual automaticity in expert chess players: Parallel encoding of chess relations.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 504–510.
Reyna, V. F., &Brainerd, C. J. (1990). Fuzzy processing in transitivity development.Annals of Operations Research,23, 37–63.
Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, M. J. (1997). On dichotomies and deductive reasoning research.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 196–204.
Roberts, M. J. (1998). Inspection times and the selection task: Are they relevant?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 781–810.
Roberts, M. J., &Newton, E. J. (2001). Inspection times, the change task, and the rapid-response selection task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 1031–1048.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sá, W., West, R. F., &Stanovich, K. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill.Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 497–510.
Schwarz, N. (1996).Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shanks, D. R., &Channon, S. (2002). Effects of a secondary task on “implicit” sequence learning: Learning or performance?Psychological Research,66, 99–109.
Shanks, D. R., &Johnstone, T. (1999). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1435–1451.
Shanks, D. R., &St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 367–447.
Sherry, D. F., &Schacter, D. L. (1987). The evolution of multiple memory systems.Psychological Review,94, 439–454.
Sides, A., Osherson, D., Bonini, N., &Viale, R. (2002). On the reality of the conjunction fallacy.Memory & Cognition,30, 191–198.
Siegler, R. S., &Stern, E. (1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 377–397.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,119, 3–22.
Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.),Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 379–398). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sloman, S. A., Over, D., Slovak, L., &Stibel, J. M. (2003). Frequency illusions and other fallacies.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,91, 296–309.
Smith, E. E., &Sloman, S. A. (1994). Similarity- versus rule-based categorization.Memory & Cognition,22, 377–386.
Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,11, 1–23.
Sperber, D., Cara, F., &Girotto,V. (1996). Relevance theory explains the selection task.Cognition,57, 31–95.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999).Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1998a). Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects.Thinking & Reasoning,4, 289–317.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1998b). Individual differences in rational thought.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 161–188.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1998c). Who uses base rates and P(D/~H)? An analysis of individual differences.Memory & Cognition,26, 161–179.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 645–665.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.),Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 421–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stenning, K., &van Lambalgen, M. (1999). Is psychology hard or impossible? Reflections on the conditional. In M. M. J. Gerbrandy, M. Marx, M. de Rijke, & Y. Venema (Eds.),Liber amicorum for Johan van Benthem’s 50th birthday (pp. 1–29). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Stenning, K., &van Lambalgen, M. (2001). Semantics as a foundation for psychology: A case study of Wason’s selection task.Journal of Logic, Language, & Information,10, 273–317.
Stevenson, R. J. (1997). Deductive reasoning and the distinction between implicit and explicit processes.Current Psychology of Cognition,16, 222–229.
Stolarz-Fantino, S., Fantino, E., &Kulik, J. (1996). The conjunction fallacy: Differential incidence as a function of descriptive frames and educational context.Contemporary Educational Psychology,21, 208–218.
Stroop, J. (1935). Studies of inference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Torrens, D., Thompson, V. A., &Cramer, K. M. (1999). Individual differences and the belief bias effect: Mental models, logical necessity, and abstract reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,5, 1–28.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science, {185}, 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review,90, 293–315.
Velmans, M. (1991). Is human information processing conscious?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,14, 651–726.
Volpe, D. T., LeDoux, J. E., &Gazzaniga, M. S. (1979). Information processing of visual stimuli in an “extinguished” field.Nature,282, 722–724.
Wallace, M. A., &Farah, M. J. (1992). Savings in relearning face-name associations as evidence for “covert recognition” in prosopagnosia.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,4, 150–154.
Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 273–281.
Wason, P. C., &Golding, E. (1974). The language of inconsistency.British Journal of Psychology,65, 537–546.
Wason, P. C., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1970). A conflict between selecting and evaluating information in an inferential task.British Journal of Psychology,61, 509–515.
Wason, P. C., &Shapiro, D. (1971). Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,23, 63–71.
Wharton, C. M., &Grafman, J. (1998). Deductive reasoning and the brain.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 54–59.