An emulative cast-in-place monolithic bridge column assembled with precast segments and UHPC materials

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering - Tập 20 - Trang 6991-7014 - 2022
Mi Zhou1, Guoqiang Zhu1, Jianwei Song2, Hang Zeng3, George C. Lee2
1Key Laboratory for Old Bridge Detection and Reinforcement Technology of Ministry of Transportation, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China
2Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA
3Si Chuan Communication Surveting & Design Institute Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China

Tóm tắt

In order to improve the applicability of precast bridge columns in high intensity zones, a precast segmental column, equivalent to the cast-in-place(CIP) column was proposed, in which the ultra-high-perfornce concrete (UHPC) was used to connect precast column components. Two 1/4-scale precast segmental bridge columns assembled with UHPC and one monolithic CIP circular column with the same dimensions were designed and tested by applying cyclic quasi-static loading. Test and analysis results show that the UHPC-connected precast columns have the same typical characteristics as a conventional monolithic CIP column with respect to plastic hinge forming mechanism, failure mode, hysteretic behavior and energy dissipation capacity. There were no noteworthy cracks and damages observed around the UHPC connection areas, which may validate that the CIP column components can be firmly and reliably connected using UHPC due to its remarkable bond and confinement performance. Finally, a set of key parameters included by the Bouc-Wen-Baber-Noori (BWBN) model were identified based on the data recorded in the test. By means of the established BWBN model, the cyclic loading responses were recalculated, which matched well those from the test. This model can be further used for the seismic time- history analysis of bridge structural systems that include the UHPC connected precast columns proposed in this paper.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ajavakom N, Ng CH, Ma F (2008) Performance of nonlinear degrading structures: identification, validation, and prediction. Comput Struct 86(7–8):652–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.07.014 Baber TT, Noori MN (1985) Random vibration of degrading pinching systems. J Eng Mech 111(8):1010–1026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:8(1010) Billington SL, Barnes RW, Breen JE (1999) A precast segmental substructure system for standard bridges. PCI J 44(4):56–73. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011999.56.73 Bu ZY, Ou YC, Song JW et al (2016) Cyclic loading test of unbonded and bonded posttensioned precast segmental bridge columns with circular section. J Bridge Eng 21(2):04015043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000807 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China (GAQSIQ) (2015) Reactive powder concrete. GB/T 31387–2015. Beijing, China Guo T, Cao ZL, Xu ZK et al (2016) Cyclic load tests on self-centering concrete pier with external dissipators and enhanced durability. J Struct Eng 142(1):04015088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001357 Hewes JT, Priestley MJN (2002) Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns. SSRP-2001/25. University of California, San Diego Huang C, Song JW, Zhang NS et al (2019) Seismic performance of precast prestressed concrete bridge girders using field-cast ultrahigh-performance concrete connections. J Bridge Eng 24(6):04019046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001416 Khaleghi B, Schultz E, Seguirant S et al (2012) Accelerated bridge construction in Washington State: from research to practice. PCI J 57(4):34–49. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012012.34.49 Kim DH, Moon DY, Kim MK et al (2015) Experimental test and seismic performance of partial precast concrete segmental bridge column with cast-in-place base. Eng Struct 100:178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.034 Lee GC, Huang C, Song JW et al (2014) Seismic performance evaluation of precast girders with field-cast ultra high performance concrete (UHPC) connections. Technical Report MCEER-14-0007. University at Buffalo, Buffalo Ma F, Zhang H, Bockstedte A et al (2004) Parameter analysis of the differential model of hysteresis. J Appl Mech-T Asme 71(3):342–349. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1668082 Marriott D, Pampanin S, Palermo A (2009) Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters. Earthq Eng Struct D 38(3):331–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.857 Marriott D, Pampanin S, Palermo A (2011) Biaxial testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters. Earthq Eng Struct D 40(15):1723–1741. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1112 Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China (MHURD) (2011) Specification for mix proportion design of normal concrete. JGJ55-2011. Beijing, China Muller MJ, Barker JM (1985) Design and construction of Linn Cove Viaduct. PCI J 30(5):38–53. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09011985.38.53 Ou YC, Chiewanichakorn M, Aref AJ et al (2007) Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns. J Struct Eng 133(11):1636–1647. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636) Ou YC, Tsai MS, Chang KC et al (2010) Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars. Earthq Eng Struct D 39(11):1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.986 Ou YC, Oktavianus Y, Tsai MS (2013) An emulative precast segmental concrete bridge column for seismic regions. Earthq Spectra 29(4):1441–1457. https://doi.org/10.1193/082511EQS205M Ou YC, Pratiwi AY, Song JW (2018) Pseudodynamic testing and inelastic displacement ratios of self-centering precast concrete segmental bridge columns. J Struct Eng 144(9):04018158. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002161 Palermo A, Pampanin S (2008) Enhanced seismic performance of hybrid bridge systems: comparison with traditional monolithic solutions. J Earthq Eng 12(8):1267–1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802003819 Palermo A, Pampanin S, Marriott D (2007) Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with posttensioned dissipating connections. J Struct Eng 133(11):1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648) Pelliciari M, Marano GC, Cuoghi T et al (2018) Parameter identification of degrading and pinched hysteretic systems using a modified Bouc-Wen model. Struct Infrastruct E 14(12):1573–1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1469652 Shafieifar M, Farzad M, Azizinamini A (2018) New connection detail to connect precast column to cap beam using ultra-high-performance concrete in accelerated bridge construction applications. Transp Res Rec 2672(41):207–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118792766 Shafieifar M, Farzad M, Azizinamini A (2020) Investigation of a detail for connecting precast columns to precast cap beams using ultrahigh-performance concrete. J Bridge Eng 25(3):04020001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001523 Sideris P (2015) Nonlinear Quasi-Static analysis of hybrid sliding-rocking bridge columns subjected to lateral loading. Eng Struct 101:125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.053 Sideris P, Aref AJ, Filiatrault A (2014) Large-scale seismic testing of a hybrid sliding-rocking posttensionned segmental bridge system. J Struct Eng 140(6):04014025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000961 Tazarv M, Saiidi MS (2015) UHPC-filled duct connections for accelerated bridge construction of RC columns in high seismic zones. Eng Struct 99:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.018 Tazarv M, Saiidi MS (2017) Design and construction of UHPC-filled duct connections for precast bridge columns in high seismic zones. Struct Infrastruct E 13(6):743–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1188969 Wang JQ, Wang Z, Gao YF et al (2018) Review on aseismic behavior of precast piers: new material, new concept, and new application. Eng Mech 36(3):1–23. https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.10.ST03 Wang Z, Wang JQ, Zhao GT et al (2020) Modeling seismic behavior of precast segmental UHPC bridge columns in a simplified method. B Earthq Eng 18(7):3317–3349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00817-z Wu ML, Smyth A (2008) Real-time parameter estimation for degrading and pinching hysteretic models. Int J Nonlinear Mech 43(9):822–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.05.010 Xu WJ, Ma B, Duan XZ et al (2021) Experimental investigation of seismic behavior of UHPC connection between precast columns and footings in bridges. Eng Struct 239:112344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112344 Yu B, Ning CL, Li B (2016) Hysteretic model for shear-critical reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng 142(9):04016056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001519 Yuan J, Graybeal B (2014) Bond behavior of reinforcing steel in ultra-high performance concrete. USDOT, McLean Zhou YH, Ou YC, Lee GC (2017) Bond-slip responses of stainless reinforcing bars in grouted ducts. Eng Struct 141:651–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.049 Zhou M, Lu W, Song JW et al (2018) Application of ultra-high performance concrete in bridge engineering. Constr Build Mater 186:1256–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.036