An empirical test of the unrelated question randomized response technique

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 30 - Trang 153-156 - 2013
Stephen E. Edgell1, Karen L. Duchan1, Samuel Himmelfarb1
1Department of Psychology, University of Louisville, Louisville

Tóm tắt

An empirical test was conducted to determine the degree to which respondents, interviewed using the unrelated question randomized response technique (RRT), would truthfully answer the nonsensitive question when directed to by the randomization outcome if that answer could be jeopardizing should it pertain to the sensitive question. Depending on the sensitive question, between 2% and 10% of the respondents did not answer the unrelated question truthfully. However, these percentages were much smaller than were previously found for the directed response RRT.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bourke, P. D. (1974). Symmetry of response in randomized response designs. (Report No. 74, Errors in Surveys Research Project). Stockholm: University of Stockholm. Bourke, P. D. (1984). Estimation of proportions using symmetric randomized response designs. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 166–172. Bourke, P. D., & Dalenius, T. (1976). Some new ideas in the realm of randomized inquiries. International Statistical Review, 44, 219–221. Edgell, S. E., Himmelfarb, S., & Duchan, K. L. (1982). The validity of forced responses in a randomized response model. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 89–100. Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden. Fligner, A. L., Poucello, G. E., & Singh, J. (1977). A comparison of two randomized response survey methods with consideration for the level of respondent protection. Communications in Statistics, Theory & Methods, A6, 1511–1524. Fox, J. A., & Tracy, P. E. (1986). Randomized response: A method for sensitive surveys. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Greenberg, B. G., Abul-Ela, A. L. S., Simmons, W. R., & Horvitz, D. G. (1969). The unrelated question randomized response model: Theoretical framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 520–539. Greenberg, B. G., Kuebler, R. R., Abernathy, J. R., & Horvitz, D. G. (1977). Respondent hazards in the unrelated question randomized response model. Journal of Statistical Planning & Inference, 1, 53–60. Himmelfarb, S., & Lickteig, C. (1982). Social desirability and the randomized response technique. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43, 710–717. Horvitz, D. G., Greenberg, B. G., & Abernathy, J. R. (1976). Randomized response: A data-gathering device for sensitive questions. International Statistical Review, 44, 181–196. Horvitz, D. G., Shah, B. V., & Simmons, W. R. (1967). The unrelated question randomized response model. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association (pp. 65–72). Lamb, C. W., Jr., & Stem, D. E., Jr. (1978). An empirical validation of the randomized response technique. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 616–621. Lanke, J. (1975). On the choice of the unrelated question in Simmons’ version of randomized response. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 80–83. Leysdeffer, F. W. (1975). Respondent jeopardy in randomized response procedures. (Tech. Rep. No. M338 & ONR Tech. Rep. No. 93), Tallahassee: Florida State University, Statistical Department. Leysieffer, F. W., & Warner, S. L. (1976). Respondent jeopardy and optimal designs in randomized response models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 649–656. Locander, W., Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. (1976). An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 269–275. O’Brien, D., & Cochran, R. S. (1977). The comprehension factor in randomized response. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association (pp. 270–272). O’Brien, D., & Cochran, R. S. (1978). The effect of less than complete truthfulness on a quantitative randomized response model. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association (pp. 743–747). Shotland, R. L., & Yankowski, L. D. (1982). The random response method: A valid and ethical indicator of the “truth” in reactive situations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 174–179. Tracy, P. E., & Fox, J. A. (1981). The validity of randomized response for sensitive measurements. American Sociological Review, 46, 187–200. Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63–69.