An empirical assessment of the validity of Mullins' theory group classifications

Scientometrics - Tập 5 - Trang 155-162 - 1983
W. E. Snizek1, M. Hughes1
1Department of Sociology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, (USA)

Tóm tắt

Using a random sample of 79 theorists selected from among six of Mullins' theory groups, this study attempts to empirically assess the validity of Mullins' theory group classifications. The procedure involved utilizes multiple discriminant analysis based on four demographic-academic variables standardized relative to the publication date of the first major work written by each theorist. Results of the discriminant analysis indicate 70 percent of 40 cases, for whom complete data were available, are correctly classified, based on Mullins' initial categorizations. These results show Mullins' classification schema as having considerable construct validity, as well as demonstrating the utility of using multiple discriminant analysis as a technique for assessing other classificatory systems.

Tài liệu tham khảo

D. MARTINDALE,The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1960. R. ARON,Main Currents in Sociological Thought, Vols. I and II, Doubleday, New York, 1965, 1968. W. WALLACE,Sociological Theory, Aldine, Chicago, 1969. N. MULLINS,Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology, Harper, New York, 1973. G. RITZER,Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science, Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 1975. J. TURNER,The Structure of Sociological Theory, Homewood, Dorsey, 1978. Directory of Members, American Sociological Association, Washington, 1974–1978. Guide to Graduate Departments of Sociology, American Sociological Association, Washington, 1970–1979. N. D. GLENN, W. VILLEMEZ, The productivity of sociologists universities,American Sociologist 5, (Aug.) (1970) 244–252. R. R. SOKAL, P. H. A. SNEATH,Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1963. R. A. CROWSON,Classification and Biology, Atherton Press, New York, 1970.