An empirical analysis of individual level casino gambling behavior
Tóm tắt
Gambling and gaming is a very large industry in the United States with about one-third of all adults participating in it on a regular basis. Using novel and unique behavioral data from a panel of casino gamblers, this paper investigates three aspects of consumer behavior in this domain. The first is that consumers are addicted to gambling, the second that they act on “irrational” beliefs, and the third that they are influenced by marketing activity that attempts to influence their gambling behavior. We use the interrelated consumer decisions to play (gamble) and the amount bet in a casino setting to focus on addiction using the standard economic definition of addiction. We test for two irrational behaviors, the “gambler’s fallacy” and the “hot hand myth”—our research represents the first test for these behaviors using disaggregate data in a real (as opposed to a laboratory) setting. Finally, we look at the effect of marketing instruments on the both the decision to play and the amount bet. Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to pin down individual-level parameters, we find that about 8% of the consumers in our sample can be classified as addicted. We find support in our data for the gambler’s fallacy, but not for the hot hand myth. We find that marketing instruments positively affect gambling behavior, and that consumers who are more addicted are also affected by marketing to a greater extent. Specifically, the long-run marketing response is about twice as high for the more addicted consumers.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ayton, P., & Fischer, I. (2004). The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory and Cognition, 32(8), 1369–1378.
Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1994). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. American Economic Review, 84(3), 396–418.
Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 675–700.
Chaloupka, F. (1991). Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 722–742.
Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the metropolis Hastings algorithm. American Statistician, 49, 327–335.
Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1993). The gambler’s fallacy in lottery play. Management Science, 39(12), 1521–1525.
Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(3), 195–209.
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(410), 398–409.
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314.
Gruber, J., & Koszegi, B. (2001). Is addiction rational? Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1261–1303.
Guryan, J., & Kearney, M. S. (2005). Lucky stores, gambling and addiction: Empirical evidence from state lottery sales. NBER Working Paper 11287.
Guryan, J., & Kearney, M. S. (2008). Gambling at lucky stores: Empirical evidence from state lottery sales. American Economic Review, 98(1), 458–473.
Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79–109.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
Heckman, J. J. (1981). Statistical models for discrete panel data. In C. F. Manski & D. L. McFadden (Ed.), Structural analysis of discrete data and econometric applications. MIT Press.
Jones, J. (2004). Profile of the American gambler. Available at http://www.harrahs.com/about_us/survey/2004_Survey.pdf. Last accessed on 15 June 2006.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Kearney, M. S. (2005). The economic winners and losers of legalized gambling. National Tax Journal, 58, 281–302.
Metzger, M. (1984). Biases in betting: An application of laboratory findings. Psychological Reports, 56, 883–888.
Mullainathan, S. (2002). Thinking through categories. Working Paper, Harvard University.
Olekalns, N., & Bardsley, P. (1996). Rational addiction to caffeine: An analysis of coffee consumption. Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), 1100–1104.
Peele, S. (1985). The meaning of addiction: Compulsive experience and its interpretation. Lexington, Mass.
Pollak, R. A. (1970). Habit formation and dynamic demand functions. Journal of Political Economy, 78(4), 745–763.
Potenza, M. N., Kosten, T. R., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2001). Pathological gambling. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(2), 141–144.
Roy, R., Chintagunta, P. K., & Haldar, S. (1996). A Framework for investigating habits: “The Hand of the Past,” and heterogeneity in dynamic demand choice. Marketing Science, 15(3), 280–299.
Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.
Tanner, T., & Wong, W. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528–549.
Terrell, D. (1994). A test of the gambler’s fallacy: Evidence from parimutuel games. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 309–317.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110.