An artificial neural network approach to bifurcating phenomena in computational fluid dynamics

Computers & Fluids - Tập 254 - Trang 105813 - 2023
Federico Pichi1,2, Francesco Ballarin3, Gianluigi Rozza1, Jan S. Hesthaven2
1mathLab, Mathematics Area, SISSA, Trieste, Italy
2Chair of Computational Mathematics and Simulation Science, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
3Department of Mathematics and Physics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Brescia, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Goodfellow, 2016 Raissi, 2019, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J Comput Phys, 378, 686, 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 Guo, 2019, Data-driven reduced order modeling for time-dependent problems, Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg, 345, 75, 10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.029 Kutyniok, 2022, A theoretical analysis of deep neural networks and parametric PDEs, Constr Approx, 55, 73, 10.1007/s00365-021-09551-4 Lee, 2020, Model reduction of dynamical systems on nonlinear manifolds using deep convolutional autoencoders, J Comput Phys, 404, 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108973 Guo, 2018, Reduced order modeling for nonlinear structural analysis using gaussian process regression, Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg, 341, 807, 10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.017 Regazzoni, 2019, Machine learning for fast and reliable solution of time-dependent differential equations, J Comput Phys, 397, 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.07.050 Wang, 2019, Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of unsteady flows using artificial neural networks with application to a combustion problem, J Comput Phys, 384, 289, 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.031 Benner, 2015, A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems, SIAM Rev, 57, 483, 10.1137/130932715 Peherstorfer, 2015, Dynamic data-driven reduced-order models, Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg, 291, 21, 10.1016/j.cma.2015.03.018 Cybenko, 1989, Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function, Math Control Signals Systems, 2, 303, 10.1007/BF02551274 Shin, 2020, On the convergence of physics informed neural networks for linear second-order elliptic and parabolic type PDEs, Commun Comput Phys, 28, 2042, 10.4208/cicp.OA-2020-0193 Mishra, 2022, Estimates on the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks for approximating PDEs, IMA J Numer Anal, 10.1093/imanum/drab032 Seydel, 2009 Kuznetsov, 1998 Caloz, 1997, Numerical analysis for nonlinear and bifurcation problems, Handb Numer Anal, 5, 487 Quarteroni, 2008 Allgower, 2003 Farrell, 2015, Deflation techniques for finding distinct solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations, SIAM J Sci Comput, 37, A2026, 10.1137/140984798 Pichi, 2019, Reduced basis approaches for parametrized bifurcation problems held by non-linear Von Kármán equations, J Sci Comput, 339, 667 Benner, 2017 Pichi, 2020 Pichi, 2022, Driving bifurcating parametrized nonlinear PDEs by optimal control strategies: Application to Navier-Stokes equations with model order reduction, ESAIM Math Model Numer Anal, 10.1051/m2an/2022044 Khamlich, 2022, Model order reduction for bifurcating phenomena in fluid-structure interaction problems, Internat J Numer Methods Fluids, 94, 1611, 10.1002/fld.5118 Pichi, 2020, A reduced order modeling technique to study bifurcating phenomena: Application to the Gross–Pitaevskii equation, SIAM J Sci Comput, 42, B1115, 10.1137/20M1313106 Pintore, 2020, Efficient computation of bifurcation diagrams with a deflated approach to reduced basis spectral element method, Adv Comput Math, 47, 10.1007/s10444-020-09827-6 Pichi F, Eftang J, Rozza G, Patera AT. Reduced order models for the buckling of hyperelastic beams. MIT-FVG “ROM2S” report, 2020. Hess, 2019, A localized reduced-order modeling approach for PDEs with bifurcating solutions, Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg, 351, 379, 10.1016/j.cma.2019.03.050 Herrero, 2013, RB (reduced basis) for RB (Rayleigh—Bénard), Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg, 132, 10.1016/j.cma.2013.02.018 Terragni, 2012, On the use of POD-based ROMs to analyze bifurcations in some dissipative systems, Phys D, 241.17, 1393, 10.1016/j.physd.2012.04.009 Hesthaven, 2015 Quarteroni, 2016, vol. 92 Patera, 2007 Barrault, 2004, An “empirical interpolation” method: Application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations, C R Acad Sci Paris, Sér I, 339, 667, 10.1016/j.crma.2004.08.006 Chaturantabut, 2010, Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation, SIAM J Sci Comput, 32, 2737, 10.1137/090766498 Hesthaven, 2018, Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of nonlinear problems using neural networks, J Comput Phys, 363, 55, 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.037 Chen, 2021, Physics-informed machine learning for reduced-order modeling of nonlinear problems, J Comput Phys, 446, 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110666 Kalia, 2021 Fresca, 2021, A comprehensive deep learning-based approach to reduced order modeling of nonlinear time-dependent parametrized PDEs, J Sci Comput, 87, 1, 10.1007/s10915-021-01462-7 Brunton, 2016, Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 113, 3932, 10.1073/pnas.1517384113 Quaini, 2016, Symmetry breaking and preliminary results about a Hopf bifurcation for incompressible viscous flow in an expansion channel, Int J Comput Fluid Dyn, 30, 7, 10.1080/10618562.2016.1144877 FEniCS. https://www.fenicsproject.org. RBniCS. https://www.rbnicsproject.org. Paszke, 2019, Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, 8024 Ambrosetti, 1995 Ciarlet, 2013 Volkwein, 2011, 1025 Hesthaven, 2014, Efficient greedy algorithms for high-dimensional parameter spaces with applications to empirical interpolation and reduced basis methods, ESAIM: M2AN, 48, 259, 10.1051/m2an/2013100 Brezzi, 1980, Finite dimensional approximation of nonlinear problems. Part I: Branches of nonsingular solutions, Numer Math, 36, 1, 10.1007/BF01395985 Ballarin, 2015, Supremizer stabilization of POD–Galerkin approximation of parametrized steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, Internat J Numer Methods Engrg, 102, 1136, 10.1002/nme.4772 Kingma, 2015 2019, Automatic machine learning: methods, systems, challenges Hess, 2022, A comparison of reduced-order modeling approaches using artificial neural networks for PDEs with bifurcating solutions, ETNA - Electron Trans Numer Anal, 56, 52, 10.1553/etna_vol56s52 Swischuk, 2019, Projection-based model reduction: Formulations for physics-based machine learning, Comput & Fluids, 179, 704, 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.07.021 Guo, 2018, Reduced order modeling for nonlinear structural analysis using Gaussian process regression, Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg, 341, 807, 10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.017 Hess, 2020, Reduced basis model order reduction for Navier–Stokes equations in domains with walls of varying curvature, Int J Comput Fluid Dyn, 34, 119, 10.1080/10618562.2019.1645328 Pitton, 2017, Computational reduction strategies for the detection of steady bifurcations in incompressible fluid-dynamics: Applications to coanda effect in cardiology, J Comput Phys, 344, 534, 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.05.010 Pitton, 2017, On the application of reduced basis methods to bifurcation problems in incompressible fluid dynamics, J Sci Comput, 73, 157, 10.1007/s10915-017-0419-6 Battaglia, 1997, Bifurcation of low Reynolds number flows in symmetric channels, AIAA J, 35, 99, 10.2514/2.68 Drikakis, 1997, Bifurcation phenomena in incompressible sudden expansion flows, Phys Fluids, 9, 76, 10.1063/1.869174 An, 2019, The lid-driven right-angled isosceles triangular cavity flow, J Fluid Mech, 875, 476, 10.1017/jfm.2019.512 Erturk, 2007, Fine grid numerical solutions of triangular cavity flow, Eur Phys J - Appl Phys, 38, 97, 10.1051/epjap:2007057 González, 2011, Three-dimensional flow instability in a lid-driven isosceles triangular cavity, J Fluid Mech, 675, 369, 10.1017/S002211201100022X