An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study

Rawla, 2019, Epidemiology of prostate cancer, World J Oncol, 10, 63, 10.14740/wjon1191 Matoso, 2019, Defining clinically significant prostate cancer on the basis of pathological findings, Histopathology, 74, 135, 10.1111/his.13712 Metter, 2019, Trends in the US and Canadian pathologist workforces from 2007 to 2017, JAMA Netw Open, 2, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4337 Evans, 2018, US Food and Drug Administration approval of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis: a key milestone is reached and new questions are raised, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 142, 1383, 10.5858/arpa.2017-0496-CP Hipp, 2012, Integration of architectural and cytologic driven image algorithms for prostate adenocarcinoma identification, Anal Cell Pathol (Amst), 35, 251, 10.1155/2012/294358 Campanella, 2019, Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images, Nat Med, 25, 1301, 10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1 Nir, 2019, Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques to evaluate performance of a classifier for automatic grading of prostate cancer from digitized histopathologic images, JAMA Netw Open, 2, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0442 Bulten, 2020, Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study, Lancet Oncol, 21, 233, 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30739-9 Rice-Stitt, 2020, Updates in histologic grading of urologic neoplasms, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 144, 335, 10.5858/arpa.2019-0551-RA Fraggetta, 2019, Clinical-grade computational pathology: alea iacta est, J Pathol Inform, 10, 38, 10.4103/jpi.jpi_54_19 Yang, 2020, False-negative histopathologic diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 144, 326, 10.5858/arpa.2019-0456-RA Steinberg, 1997, Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings, Am J Surg Pathol, 21, 566, 10.1097/00000478-199705000-00010 Kronz, 2003, Lesions missed on prostate biopsies in cases sent in for consultation, Prostate, 54, 310, 10.1002/pros.10182 Truesdale, 2011, Gleason score concordance on biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer: is pathological re-evaluation necessary prior to radical prostatectomy?, BJU Int, 107, 749, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09570.x Goodman, 2012, Frequency and determinants of disagreement and error in Gleason scores: a population-based study of prostate cancer, Prostate, 72, 1389, 10.1002/pros.22484 Raciti, 2020, Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies, Mod Pathol, 10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y Laifenfeld D, Sandbank J, Linhart C, et al. Performance of an AI-based cancer diagnosis system in France's largest network of pathology institutes. 31st European Congress of Pathology; Sept 7–11, 2019; Nice, France (abstr 043). Owens, 2010, Initial experience with a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for review of random surgical pathology diagnoses in a subspecialty-based university practice, Am J Surg Pathol, 34, 1319, 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181ecfe80 Parwani, 2019, Automated diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer—are artificial intelligence systems ready for prime time?, J Pathol Inform, 10, 41, 10.4103/jpi.jpi_56_19 Goldenberg, 2019, A new era: artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate cancer, Nat Rev Urol, 16, 391, 10.1038/s41585-019-0193-3 Ström, 2020, Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study, Lancet Oncol, 21, 222, 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30738-7 Arvaniti, 2018, Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning, Sci Rep, 8, 10.1038/s41598-018-30535-1 Nagpal, 2019, Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer, NPJ Digit Med, 2, 48, 10.1038/s41746-019-0112-2 Nir, 2018, Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: learning from multiple experts, Med Image Anal, 50, 167, 10.1016/j.media.2018.09.005 Lucas, 2019, Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies, Virchows Arch, 475, 77, 10.1007/s00428-019-02577-x Sparks, 2013, Statistical Shape Model for Manifold Regularization: Gleason grading of prostate histology, Comput Vis Image Underst, 117, 1138, 10.1016/j.cviu.2012.11.011 Hossain, 2020, Automated approach for estimation of grade groups for prostate cancer based on histological image feature analysis, Prostate, 80, 291, 10.1002/pros.23943 Harnden, 2007, The prognostic significance of perineural invasion in prostatic cancer biopsies: a systematic review, Cancer, 109, 13, 10.1002/cncr.22388 Paner, 2019, Essential updates in grading, morphotyping, reporting, and staging of prostate carcinoma for general surgical pathologists, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 143, 550, 10.5858/arpa.2018-0334-RA Leo, 2016, Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images, J Med Imaging (Bellingham), 3