An artefactual field experiment of group discrimination between sports fans

Craig A. Depken1, Adam J. Hoffer2, Abdul H. Kidwai2
1Department of Economics, Belk College of Business, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte, USA
2Department of Economics, University of WI, La Crosse, La Crosse, USA

Tóm tắt

This paper describes the outcome of an artefactual field experiment of group discrimination using sports fans. The behavior of individuals whose identity is deeply tied to a larger group or popular institution is politically important, particularly when it comes to crafting public policy. Sports fans provide a unique opportunity to study individuals who openly identify their in-group and rival groups. The study identifies within-subject group-based discrimination by quantifying the difference in dictator game takes (out of a possible $10) between fans of an individual’s self-professed team and fans of an individual’s self-professed rival. Fifty-two sports fans each participated in nine separate power-to-take dictator games with group identification spanning three levels (NCAA Division III, NCAA Division I, and professional) of football fandom. The results suggest that individuals discriminate between in-group and out-group members. The average takings ratio with same-team fans is 0.657 while the average takings ratio with other-team fans is 0.848 and the difference of 0.190 is statistically different from zero. We discuss the results in the context of team and league governance focusing on fan interactions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arif I, Hoffer A, Stansel D, Lacombe D (2020) Economic freedom and migration: a metro area-level analysis. South Econ J 87(1):170–190 Arif I, Hoffer A, Humphreys B, Style M (2022) New sports facilities do not drive migration between US cities. In press, Economics of governance Ashby NJ (2007) Economic freedom and migration flows between US states. South Econ J 73(3):677–697 Balliet D, Wu J, De Dreu CKW (2014) In-group favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 140(6):1556 Bardsley N (2008) Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? Exp Econ 11(2):122–133 Baxter J, Carlsson-Wall M, Chua WF, Kraus K (2019) Accounting for the cost of sports-related violence. Account Audit Account J 32(7):1956–1981 Ben-Ner A, McCall B, Stephane M, Wang H (2009) Identity and in-group/out-group differentiation in work and giving behaviors: experimental evidence. J Econ Behav Organ 72(1):153–170 Berry WD, Fording RC, Hanson RL (2003) Reassessing the “race to the bottom” in state welfare policy. J Politics 65(2):327–349 Billings S, Depken C II (2012) Sport events and criminal activity: A spatial analysis. In: Jewell R (ed) Violence and aggression in sporting contests: economics, history and policy. Springer, New York, pp 175–187 Cart J (2011) Numerous fights marked Raiders-49ers game before shooting. Los Angeles Times. latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/08/numerous-fights-marked-raiders-49ers-game-before-shooting.html. Accessed May 2021 Chowdhury SM, Jeon JY, Saha B (2017) Gender differences in the giving and taking variants of the dictator game. South Econ J 84(2):474–483 Dalakas V, Melancon J (2012) Fan identification, schadenfreude toward hated rivals, and the mediating effects of Importance of Winning Index (IWIN). J Serv Mark 26:51–59 Dawes CT et al (2012) Generosity and political preferences. IFN Working Paper. Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2179522 Di Domizio M, Caruso R (2014) Hooliganism and demand for football in Italy: attendance and counter violence policy evaluation. Ger Econ Rev 16(2):123–137 Engel C (2011) Dictator games: a meta study. Exp Econ 14(4):583–610 Fischbacher U (2007) Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10(2):171–178 Grossman PJ, Eckel CC (2015) Giving versus taking for a cause. Econ Lett 132:28–30 Heere B, James J (2007) Stepping outside the lines: developing a multi-dimensional team identity scale based on social identity theory. Sport Manag Review 10(1):65–91 Hoffer AJ (2016) Special-interest spillovers and tobacco taxation. Contemp Econ Policy 34(1):146–157 Hoffer A, Humphreys BR, Lacombe DJ, Ruseski JE (2015) Trends in NCAA athletic spending: arms race or rising tide? J Sports Econ 16(6):576–596 Hoffer A, Humphreys BR, Ruseski JE (2019) State cigarette taxes and health expenditures: evidence from dynamic spatial lag panel models. Pap Reg Sci 98(2):925–950 Hoffer AJ, Lacombe DJ (2017) Excise tax setting in a dynamic space-time framework. Public Financ Rev 45(5):628–646 Hoffer AJ, Pincin JA (2015) The effects of conference realignment on NCAA athletic departments. Appl Econ Lett 22(15):1209–1223 Hoffer A, Pincin JA (2016) The effects of revenue changes on NCAA athletic departments’ expenditures. J Sport Soc Issues 40(1):82–102 Humphreys, B. 2015 The future of behavioral economics in sports economics research. Keynote Presentation at the European Sports Economics Association Conference, Zurich, Switzerland Jabbar, N. Alcohol will be sold at Champions League and Europa League matches from next season. Sportbible.com (Jun 26 2018), Available at www.sportbible.com/football/news-alcohol-will-be-sold-at-champions-and-europa-league-matches-20180626, last Accessed May 2021. Kanbur, R., & Keen, M. (1993). Jeux sans frontieres: Tax competition and tax coordination when countries differ in size. Am Econ Rev 877–892 Lane T (2016) Discrimination in the laboratory: a meta-analysis of economics experiments. Eur Econ Rev 90:375–402 Lenor S, Lenten L, McKenzie J (2016) Rivalry effects and unbalanced schedule optimisation in the Australian football league. Rev Ind Organ 49:43–69 List JA (2007) On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. J Political Econ 115(3):482–493 Menaker B, McGranahan D, Sheptak R (2019) Game day alters crime pattern in the vicinity of sport venues in cleveland, OH”. J Sport Saf Secur 1:1 Mills B, Tainsky S, Green B, Leopkey B (2018) The ultimatum game in the college football rivalry context. J Sport Manag 32(1):11–23 Paul R, Weinbach A (2013) Determinants of dynamic pricing premiums in major league baseball. Sport Mark Q 22:152–165 Sanford K, Scott F (2016) Assessing the intensity of sports rivalries using data from secondary market transactions. J Sports Econ 17:159–174 Schimmel KS (2006) Deep play: sports mega-events and urban social conditions in the USA. The Sociol Rev 54(2):160–174 Szymanski S, Winfree J (2018) On the optimal realignment of a contest: the case of college football. Econ Inq 56(1):483–496 Taylor, P. The Hillsborough stadium disaster. Inquiry by the Rt Hon Lord Justice Taylor (1989). Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64(5):416–424 Wang Long, Malhotra Deepak, Keith Murnighan J (2011) Economics education and greed. Acad Manag Learn Educ 10(4):643–660